On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 12:48 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I also talked about removing the commons-logging dependency (which
seemed to be in agreeance at the time),
as at least in our environment we don't use it.
The more I think about this the more I get the opinion we should
also
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:14 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i agree with ceki that the future is static (rather than dynamic)
binding. i prefer bytecode engineering to different compilation.
And I agree with both of you - provided one of the static
implementations provides much of the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37441.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+contributor
+ nameMark Proctor/name
+ idmprotor/id
+ emailmproctor at codehaus.org/email
+/contributor
/contributors
dependencies
id is an invalid element for a contributor (you can't just make
them up :)
Hm... copy past ...cannot remember where it came
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37443.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37443.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36051.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
These sound like good ideas.
Not sure why you need two TimeoutWrappers though, as
you are only trapping the remove() aren't you?
Stephen
--- James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on my response to Sandy McArthur about using
Buffers to implements
Commons Pool, I started digging around
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
No, you'd need to override add also, so you'd know when to fire
notify()/notifyAll(). Correct?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 7:40 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [collections] New Buffer
Oh, I see what you mean. You're right. I don't know what I was thinking
(not enough coffee yet or something). The BoundedBuffer wrapper would
actually enforce a maximum size and wait until something was removed from it
(there you'd have to also override the remove and clear methods and the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37441.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
No idea, I think this is only errorring out on me because I'm using
Maven 1.1 - prior to that I think it was just deprecated and ignored.
Mark
Torsten Curdt wrote:
+contributor
+ nameMark Proctor/name
+ idmprotor/id
+ emailmproctor at codehaus.org/email
+/contributor
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37447.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37447.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37443.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36527.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Everything looks good to me. But when I tried building with ant the
jakarta-slide-webdavlib could not be loaded resulting in compile errors
(with maven build was successful). Is this is a problem with build.xml?
When this problem is fixed (or if you confirm that this is not an
issue), I am
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Oliver Heger wrote:
Everything looks good to me. But when I tried building with ant the
jakarta-slide-webdavlib could not be loaded resulting in compile
errors (with maven build was successful). Is this is a problem with
build.xml?
The problem is, that the webdavlib is not on ibiblio, but my
Author: ozeigermann
Date: Thu Nov 10 09:58:48 2005
New Revision: 332340
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332340view=rev
Log:
Added check if file really is deleted. Throw an exception otherwise to indicate
an error condition.
Modified:
Hi Niklas!
This sounds like a bug. An exception and error condition should indeed
be the reasonable behavior. The test case looks suspicious, however.
Doesn't it manually insert something into the managed directories?
Anway, added a fix like this now:
if
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37454.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: imario
Date: Thu Nov 10 11:41:20 2005
New Revision: 332357
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332357view=rev
Log:
fixed path to snapshot versions. Thanks to Oliver Heger.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/build.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/build.xml
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
I can manually edit the build.xml, should I?
Ok, answered myself - its fixed now.
Thanks!
---
Mario
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
thats the exact patch I did in our application as well.
After I sent the first email I've been thinking some more on this. I
would expect it to fail already during deleteResource(), not on
commit(). In our case we commit multiple sources and failing on a commit
means that we might be
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 00:39 +0100, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 11/7/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's the two stages of polymorphism which are confusing the engine. a
BeanBindAction is used for the mapping to allow a later potential
polymorphic match. however, no check
You are right. It would be desirable to make it fail as soon as
possible. This would mean, however, that you touch the original file
as soon as you try to delete it and not only when you commit the
transaction. But the philosophy if this transactional implementation
is not to touch the original
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Nov 10 13:29:25 2005
New Revision: 332379
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332379view=rev
Log:
Breaks dependency from GenericObjectPool to commons-collections. Submitted by
Sandy McArthur. Issue #37428.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37428.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37153.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37153.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Nov 10 13:43:07 2005
New Revision: 332380
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332380view=rev
Log:
Break dependency from GenericObjectKeyedPool to commons-collections. Submitted
by Sandy McArthur. Issue #37431.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37431.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37153.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Nov 10 13:46:22 2005
New Revision: 332381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332381view=rev
Log:
Pool no longer has a core dependency on commons-collections.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 13:43 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote:
Currently Pool only depends on the CursorableLinkedList when using the
Generic[Keyed]ObjectPool classes. I'd like to see this go away for two
reasons.
First, because the size of the Collections jar (546K) dwarfs the Pool
jar (41K) and
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 01:17 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote:
In the past weeks I've been working on a new implementation for Pool
that I'm calling a Composite Object Pool (COP). I'm at the point where
I think I've implemented everything I think the pool should have and
then some. I would like
thanks to sandy's hard work, looks like pool's starting to gain some
momentum. this seems like a good time to start a thread about the
future.
trunk is now versioned 2.0-dev and this seems appropriate since it seems
that the next release of this code will contain quite a few changes.
however,
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 21:04 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
snip
Can a new release of CL rule out all the classloading problems
people had before?
What's currently in SVN head will probably fix 90% of the problems, and
is about 99% backwards compatible. I would love to see it released, so
On 11/10/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
took me a long while to track down the best way to fix the problem (must
be getting old ;)
I don't think so, rather we're getting better all the time in finding
the weirdest usage cases that nobody could ever have dreamed of ;-)
Tom
Any other feedback? See: http://sandy.mcarthur.org/pool/
Since I've sent the last email I've reworked the idle object evictor
code such that it generates the least amount of contention I think is
possible short of using util.concurrent locking. The new eviction code
has the following properties:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36527.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 22:13 +0100, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 11/10/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
took me a long while to track down the best way to fix the problem (must
be getting old ;)
I don't think so, rather we're getting better all the time in finding
the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37393.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37393.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: tcurdt
Date: Thu Nov 10 15:59:34 2005
New Revision: 332401
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332401view=rev
Log:
removed StringUtils runtime dep, different extensions (thanks to Mark Proctor)
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37389.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37436.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: tcurdt
Date: Thu Nov 10 16:06:55 2005
New Revision: 332402
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332402view=rev
Log:
fixed the pom
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/project.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32573.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: tcurdt
Date: Thu Nov 10 16:15:55 2005
New Revision: 332406
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332406view=rev
Log:
a simple factory implementation
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/JavaCompilerFactory.java
Modified:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
The removeIndex is the index of the hash bucket, not the hash code. This
bit of code is simply trying to find the entry before that we want to
remove, where we already know the entry we want to remove.
got that bit but missed the use of header to store order
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37409.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37409.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37409.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
(unless anyone else with karma wants to jump in here as a volunteer) i'm
willing to act as release manager for this release. however, i would
need help with this release so i need to gauge the level of support
amongst the wider development community.
any
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37436.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37409.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 11/11/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's strangely fitting: 'seeker of weird undreamt use cases' sounds
like a dot bust job title for an alpha developer...
that would also fit for a couple of clients that I had over the years ...
Tom
Do you think that the aforementioned wrapper classes (TimeoutBuffer and
BoundedBuffer) are candidates for inclusion in the release?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 7:19 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37134.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: niallp
Date: Thu Nov 10 20:43:58 2005
New Revision: 332448
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332448view=rev
Log:
Fix further issue in Bug 17663 - getArrayProperty does not use ConvertUtils -
reported by Etienne Bernard
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17663.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32573.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: niallp
Date: Thu Nov 10 22:50:39 2005
New Revision: 332476
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332476view=rev
Log:
Fix Bug 18811 Misleading error message in ConvertingWrapDynaBean (and also in
WrapDynaBean) - reported by Aslak Hellesøy.
Modified:
On 11/10/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks to sandy's hard work, looks like pool's starting to gain some
momentum. this seems like a good time to start a thread about the
future.
Here is my Pool wish list. Since these could change the behavior of
existing code (but not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18811.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
90 matches
Mail list logo
