svn commit: r399162 - /jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/src/conf/checkclipse-filter.properties

Author: dion Date: Tue May 2 23:13:09 2006 New Revision: 399162 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399162&view=rev Log: Ignore example code Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/src/conf/checkclipse-filter.properties Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/src/conf/checkclips

Re: [lang] 2.2 update

On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 39167 [lang] escapeXML() -> Not escaping low characters 38210 [lang] StringEscaper.escapeXml() escapes characters > 0x7f Need to decide on these two escaping ones. Do we change our behaviour? There was a bit of discussion on -user about

[lang] 2.2 update

14 issues lined up for completion before 2.2 happens. Sorry if any of these are just repeats of last time: 3 [lang] EnumUtils.getEnum() doesn't work well in 1.5 33965 [lang] Can't XMLDecode an Enum These two might be related. Not looked at them much otherwise. 37499 [lang] parseDate

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36873] - [lang] Extending VariableFormatter to use FormatPatterns

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r399148 - /jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/builder/ToStringBuilderTest.java

Author: bayard Date: Tue May 2 22:28:59 2006 New Revision: 399148 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399148&view=rev Log: Commenting out unit test for 36061 so unit tests pass again Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/builder/ToStringBuilderTest.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36061] - [lang] ToStringBuilder throws StackOverflowError when an Object cycle exists

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36061] - [lang] ToStringBuilder throws StackOverflowError when an Object cycle exists

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36061] - [lang] ToStringBuilder throws StackOverflowError when an Object cycle exists

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r399141 - /jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/builder/ToStringBuilderTest.java

Author: bayard Date: Tue May 2 21:59:09 2006 New Revision: 399141 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399141&view=rev Log: Committing a failing test (StackOverflow) as a part of #36061 Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/builder/ToStringBuilderTes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36061] - [lang] ToStringBuilder throws StackOverflowError when an Object cycle exists

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39368] - [lang] replace() length calculation improvement

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r399127 - /jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/StringUtils.java

Author: bayard Date: Tue May 2 21:33:47 2006 New Revision: 399127 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399127&view=rev Log: Applying the optimisation advised by Paul Benedict in #39368 Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/StringUtils.java Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39368] - [lang] replace() length calculation improvement

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

+1 Henri Yandell wrote: > I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration > plan: > > > * Make Bugzilla read-only > * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project in JIRA > This will pull over users, components, versions etc. > * Setup notification scheme

Re: Jira migration Was: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

Martin Cooper wrote: > On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 5/2/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > * Cleanup Commons project (we'll still use it as a >> > > catch-all). Delete components/versions. >> > >> > This does not match: >> > >> > > * Make Bugzill

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-id (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-id (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1

Re: [email] activation and javamail

I had put them in ibiblio, will be available soon On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Downloads okay, though a bit of noise from cookies. Meant increasing the version that commons-email depends upon (or at least is compiled against). Currently the unit tests are hanging though,

Re: [email] activation and javamail

Downloads okay, though a bit of noise from cookies. Meant increasing the version that commons-email depends upon (or at least is compiled against). Currently the unit tests are hanging though, on the EmailTest. Hen On 5/2/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hurray! http://weblogs.jav

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39393] - [validator] ValidatorAction needs thread-safe

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[email] activation and javamail

Hurray! http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/archive/2006/05/javamail_and_ac.html Could someone add that to email, please? cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39393] - [validator] ValidatorAction needs thread-safe

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r399083 - /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/branches/performance-ideas2/

Author: sandymac Date: Tue May 2 16:23:10 2006 New Revision: 399083 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399083&view=rev Log: exploring some performance ideas Added: jakarta/commons/proper/pool/branches/performance-ideas2/ - copied from r399082, jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/ -

[jelly] Migration effect Was: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

On 5/2/06, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: +1 > * For each of the 37 components > ** Create new project - name: "Commons Xxxx", key "". What woul

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

Henri Yandell wrote: I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: * Make Bugzilla read-only * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project in JIRA This will pull over users, components, versions etc. * Setup notification scheme * Setup permission

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: +1 * For each of the 37 components ** Create new project - name: "Commons Xxxx", key "". What would happen with projects already on Jira, like Jelly? -

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

> [X] +1 > [ ] -1 cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

+0.5 Henri Yandell wrote: I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: * Make Bugzilla read-only * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project in JIRA This will pull over users, components, versions etc. * Setup notification scheme * Setup permi

Re: Jira migration Was: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

On 5/2/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We'd suck all the data into a project in Jira called Commons. Then > we'd move stuff out of it into individual projects until we had just > [site]/[all] issues left. Then we'd delete the ve

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

+1 Henri Yandell wrote: I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: * Make Bugzilla read-only * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project in JIRA This will pull over users, components, versions etc. * Setup notification scheme * Setup permiss

[VFS] renaming file with only case differences

Hi, I'm running in the following problem: VFS doesn't seem to be able to rename a file to another name when only the case is different. On windows, since the file system is case insensitive, File.exists() returns true, which causes FileObject.moveTo() to actually delete the source file (since it'

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39375] - [vfs] VFS is not able to rename or move read-only files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Using LGPL [Was: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38846] - [VFS] New provider: iso9660]

Hi! > I think we can go ahead and allow this pretty soon Mario, as long as > we never distribute the LGPL jar. Great news! > The only proviso being that VFS should not fall over if the LGPL jars > are not available (and their features unused). This is the case. > (have reopened the bug so it won't

Re: Jira migration Was: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/2/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Cleanup Commons project (we'll still use it as a > > catch-all). Delete components/versions. > > This does not match: > > > * Make Bugzilla read-only > > What about creating an 'Catch a

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: * Make Bugzilla read-only * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project in JIRA This will pull over users, components, versions etc. * Setup notifica

Jira migration Was: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

On 5/2/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Cleanup Commons project (we'll still use it as a > catch-all). Delete components/versions. This does not match: > * Make Bugzilla read-only What about creating an 'Catch all' product in JIRA and only using JIRA? It would be. My fault f

RE: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

+1 > * Cleanup Commons project (we'll still use it as a > catch-all). Delete components/versions. This does not match: > * Make Bugzilla read-only What about creating an 'Catch all' product in JIRA and only using JIRA? Gary > -Original Message- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PR

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

+1 On 5/2/06, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 10:51 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote: > I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: > > > * Make Bugzilla read-only > * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project i

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

+1 On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 10:51 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote: > I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration > plan: > > > * Make Bugzilla read-only > * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project in JIRA > This will pull over users, components, versions

RE: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

+1 -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:52 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: * Make Bugzilla read-only * I

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

+1 On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: * Make Bugzilla read-only * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project in JIRA This will pull over users, components, versions etc. * Setup noti

Re: [compress] New draft 5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> So my comments: >> >> o Don't like that compressor does both compression and decompression. > > I'm ambivalent on this one. > If we would do so, we have 4 different interfaces. But i like the look. >> o Always use File not String > > +1. Only u

Re: [VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Henri Yandell wrote: > I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose > migration plan: > > > * Make Bugzilla read-only > * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project in JIRA > This will pull over users, components,

[VOTE][all] Switch to Jira

I'd like to call a vote that we switch to Jira. Here's the loose migration plan: * Make Bugzilla read-only * Import Commons project in Bugzilla into Commons project in JIRA This will pull over users, components, versions etc. * Setup notification scheme * Setup permission scheme * Setup group *

Re: [compress] New draft 5

On 5/2/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, joining the party so late ...but this thread let me to actually have a look ;) So my comments: o Don't like that compressor does both compression and decompression. I'm ambivalent on this one. o Always use File not String +1. Only

Re: [lang] VariableFormatter issues

>>>The implementation in the ticket subclasses VariableFormatter, why not >>>subclass just MapVariableResolver only? >>> >>> >>> >> >>Because of the above mentionned bloated API if you want to turn it >>on/off in VariableFormatter. >> >> > > I think part of the problem is that many method sig

Using LGPL [Was: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38846] - [VFS] New provider: iso9660]

I think we can go ahead and allow this pretty soon Mario, as long as we never distribute the LGPL jar. See: http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html The only proviso being that VFS should not fall over if the LGPL jars are not available (and their features unused). This is a policy change

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38846] - [VFS] New provider: iso9660

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39465] - [jxpath] Property "name" of a bean-array can't be reached due to special handling with Maps

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39465] New: - Property "name" of a bean-array can't be reached due to special handling with Maps

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [compress] New draft 5

Sorry, joining the party so late ...but this thread let me to actually have a look ;) So my comments: o Don't like that compressor does both compression and decompression. o Always use File not String o Please parameter overloading ...this method naming scheme makes the API really ugly But to

Re: [compress] New draft 5

On 5/1/06, Sandy McArthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/30/06, will pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) You often change method names based on the parameter types, e.g. > Archiver.addFile + Archiver.addFileName, setUnpackDestinationName + > setUnpackDestinationFile, etc. It seems more conven

Re: [VOTE] Release RC10 As Commons Logging 1.1

Hi, To save people reading through below, my summary is: Some excellent proofreading here, and a number of doc/release-notes issues have been found by Dennis, as well as a case where we could use constants instead of inline strings, and one where we should technically be using a param value inst

svn commit: r398887 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk: ./ core/ tests/ tests/src/test/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/eclipse/ tests/src/test/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/groovy/ tests/src/

Author: tcurdt Date: Tue May 2 03:12:49 2006 New Revision: 398887 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398887&view=rev Log: moved the reports into the core, url fix, remove empty dirs Removed: jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/tests/src/test/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/eclipse/

Re: [compress] New draft 5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > My fault for only just joining in etc, but why have the underlying > Tar/Zip classes become package scoped? Does the bridging API replace > all need to dig into the lower-level APIs? > I was not thinking enough about this. In my fault i was thinkin

Re: [compress] New draft 5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sandy McArthur wrote: > On 4/30/06, C. Grobmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> here is a new draft for the compress interface: >> >> * http://grobmeier.de/commons-compress-draft-5.zip > > Same as before, suggestions as a stream of consciousness, take

Re: [compress] New draft 5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henri Yandell wrote: > If you could fill out the software grant: > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants > > and either fax or postal-mail it (see instructions in first paragraph > of "http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt";). > I will fill ou