Juozas,
skip
But I don't know how to handle By Value.
void myMethod( MyInterfaceType mt ){
mt.setSomething(X);//Don't understand how to handle this ( is
X set on copy of Object ? )
}
X will be a copy of the object if pass by value or over the wire.
I'm not quite sure
Hi,
Yes I see it is possible to solve problems this kind.
I need transparent distributed objects in my projects, It is because I
speak a lot about ARMI. I am afraid this
can be difficult to understand for my coworkers, but will fink a lot about
this before next project. I think
Transparent
Juozas,
Yes I see it is possible to solve problems this kind.
I need transparent distributed objects in my projects, It is because I
speak a lot about ARMI. I am afraid this
can be difficult to understand for my coworkers, but will fink a lot
about this before next project. I think
Folks,
I've coded another tranport type for AltRMI - Direct-Marshalled
Here is a comparison of three similar AltRMI types:
* Direct Marshalled Transport.
- marshalling takes place.
- instances passed by value between client and server may not be a
mutually visible classloader.
-
Hi,
It is very interesting, does somebody works on persistence ?
I know this stuff like JTA, JAAS, JDO ... .
I work on persistence in the current project, I have plans to complete it
next weak.
Idea is like this : User defines some interfaces and optional mappings.
Container or application
Juozas,
It is very interesting, does somebody works on persistence ?
No yet. The example beans have no persistence. The idea is that the
developer chooses what type of persistence they need. File, Store,
JDBC, JDO.
I know this stuff like JTA, JAAS, JDO ... .
Thats good.
