Phil Steitz wrote:
+1 - need to do this anyway.
On 6/29/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, it seems that I spoke too soon. We need a place in subversion to
put the tagged release. Since the pom is currently in sandbox-trunks
there simply is no tags directory to put the release
+1 - need to do this anyway.
On 6/29/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, it seems that I spoke too soon. We need a place in subversion to
put the tagged release. Since the pom is currently in sandbox-trunks
there simply is no tags directory to put the release in.
I propose that
This is not a Jakarta thing anymore :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> The results are in:
>
> +1
> Dennis Lundberg
> Torsten Curdt
> Niall Pemberton
>
> -0
> Rahul Akolkar
>
>
> I will proceed with the release.
>
>
> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It is time to release version 1
Hmm, it seems that I spoke too soon. We need a place in subversion to
put the tagged release. Since the pom is currently in sandbox-trunks
there simply is no tags directory to put the release in.
I propose that we move the sandbox parent out of sandbox-trunks and into
a commons-sandbox-parent
The results are in:
+1
Dennis Lundberg
Torsten Curdt
Niall Pemberton
-0
Rahul Akolkar
I will proceed with the release.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The
latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and
locking
+1 from me
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The
latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and
locking down the versions for plugins. Note that I have changed the
artifactId to commons-sandbox-parent, to have a con
On 6/24/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23.06.2007, at 18:59, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The
>> latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-p
On 23.06.2007, at 18:59, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The
latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and
locking down the versions for plugins. Note that I ha
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/24/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the
>> > san
On 6/24/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the
>> > sandbox at all. Sure, rep
On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/23/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This will be the first release and is important because it enables
> >
On 6/24/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the
>> > sandbox at all. Sure, rep
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the
> sandbox at all. Sure, reproducibility is a good thing, but I doubt the
> builds are radically ir
On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This will be the first release and is important because it enables
> > reproducible builds and site generation for the sandbox compo
On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the
> sandbox at all. Sure, reproducibility is a good thing, but I doubt the
> builds are radically irreproducible without t
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The
> latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and
> locking down the ver
On 6/23/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This will be the first release and is important because it enables
> reproducible builds and site generation for the sandbox components.
Since you have a policy against releasing sandbox
On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The
> latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and
> locking down the versions for plugins. N
On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This will be the first release and is important because it enables
reproducible builds and site generation for the sandbox components.
Since you have a policy against releasing sandbox components, why not
just deploy snapshots of the sandb
On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The
latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and
locking down the versions for plugins. Note that I have changed the
artifactId to commons-sandbox-pare
Hi,
It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The
latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and
locking down the versions for plugins. Note that I have changed the
artifactId to commons-sandbox-parent, to have a consistent naming scheme
(compare it t
21 matches
Mail list logo