Just for people's info, I posted the vote to general@ yesterday.
On 4/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the end should be nigh for Jakarta (those on private@ will
have seen a thread in which I side-topic'd with the feeling that the
end should be nigh for Jakarta). Previously
+1 to you :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> On 06.05.2007, at 19:51, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> On 5/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 5/1/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > On 5/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > (http://wik
+1 for doing it.
+1 for either Hen or Torsten as chair
Will add humble self to list (of members)
Phil
On 5/6/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/6/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 06.05.2007, at 19:51, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > On 5/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL
On 5/6/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 06.05.2007, at 19:51, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 5/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 5/1/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 5/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > (http://wiki.apac
On 06.05.2007, at 19:51, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 5/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/1/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution) and
secondly,
> > anyone
On 5/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/1/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution) and secondly,
> > anyone want to volunteer to chair things?
>
> As you are o
Jochen asked that too:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
My reply was:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
In terms of your direct questions, I don't think moving gives us
anything
Sorry for the dumb question, I may have missed an important thread, but
what do we gain exactly by moving to a TLP ? What will be different ? I
can see the external aspects like a new web site, new mailing lists and
the loss of the Jakarta brand, but I doubt we are moving just for this.
Will th
On 5/1/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution) and secondly,
> anyone want to volunteer to chair things?
As you are one of the most active persons here and also the one who is
pus
On 5/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution) and secondly,
anyone want to volunteer to chair things?
As you are one of the most active persons here and also the one who is
pushing this forward: How about yourself? :-)
Jochen
--
My
On 4/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So with that said - I'd like to propose that we move to commons.apache.org.
Apologies for the delay. I a) wanted to back off and see what effect
the proposal had on Jakarta, b) was on semi-vacation and c) was
subsequently ill.
We've three st
On 4/4/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On 4/2/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> +1 for only Java components (flame away, this is just my HO)
>Yep - though in reality this means:
>"We'll do whatever the co
"Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>My long term thinking for how this would be handled is:
>Multiple PMCs, one website. So we'd have Java Commons, Ruby Commons,
>BobsYourUncle Commons PMCs, and they'd all share a commons.apache.org
>website.
>Does that make you less wary of our
+1 to everything in your email. There's lots of room for 'finished' or
'maintenance' as it seems to be called more often. We've already got
that in Commons in Discovery and Attributes at the very least.
Hen
On 4/4/07, Daniel F. Savarese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For at least ORO, there has be
I wrote:
>+1 on the TLP vote
s/vote/idea/
will vote +1 when the actual vote is held.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 on the TLP vote
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?iso-88
59-1?Q?J=F6rg_Schaible?= writes:
>I never got why things like ECS, ORO, regexp are not part of commons. =
>What makes them different to logging or digester? I can understand the =
>separation for something like POI, but not necessarily f
On 4/4/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>So with that said - I'd like to propose that we move to commons.apache.org.
+1 to that, -0 to the name.
"commons" is too generic. There is already an XML commons and I could
We alre
+1
Henri Yandell wrote:
I think the end should be nigh for Jakarta (those on private@ will
have seen a thread in which I side-topic'd with the feeling that the
end should be nigh for Jakarta). Previously I've suggested that
Commons should flatten into Jakarta and that Jakarta should become a
gen
"Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On 4/2/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> +1 for only Java components (flame away, this is just my HO)
>Yep - though in reality this means:
>"We'll do whatever the community wants to do. If someone proposes a
>Ruby library and we ha
"Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I think the end should be nigh for Jakarta (those on private@ will
>have seen a thread in which I side-topic'd with the feeling that the
>end should be nigh for Jakarta). Previously I've suggested that
>Commons should flatten into Jakarta and that Jakar
Henri Yandell wrote on Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:36 PM:
> On 4/3/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've got a question: If we have commons.apache.org, what will be the
>> difference to jakarta.apache.org, apart from the missing projects?
>> Why do we expect that c.a.p will work, a
+1
Oliver Zeigermann wrote on Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:18 AM:
> +1 to all said. I could even help.
>
> -0 to waiting until we have a clear idea about the rest of Jakarta as
> this is likely to never happen. Maybe a clearer idea will form after
> commons leaves Jakarta.
>
> Oliver
>
> 2007/4
+1 for c.a.o, since I think it is right thing for commons.
I really regret this step is necessary and is the beginning of the end of
Jakarta. Even though this
process started earlier than this proposal, this process will make the end of
Jakarta unavoidable. I
always hoped flattening commons wo
A group of people that care about the same things under one umbrella, with it's
own power of making
decisions. Jakarta isn't that, c.a.o will for commons.
Mvgr,
Martin
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> I've got a question: If we have commons.apache.org, what will be the
> difference to jakarta.apache.org
On 4/3/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got a question: If we have commons.apache.org, what will be the
difference to jakarta.apache.org, apart from the missing projects? Why
do we expect that c.a.p will work, although we assume that j.a.p
didn't?
I had three answers to this
On 4/3/07, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 to all said. I could even help.
-0 to waiting until we have a clear idea about the rest of Jakarta as
this is likely to never happen. Maybe a clearer idea will form after
commons leaves Jakarta.
I guess that's one way to force the iss
I've got a question: If we have commons.apache.org, what will be the
difference to jakarta.apache.org, apart from the missing projects? Why
do we expect that c.a.p will work, although we assume that j.a.p
didn't?
Thanks,
Jochen
--
My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every
On 4/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/2/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +0 for waiting to do this until we have a clear idea of where the rest
> of the Jakarta subprojects are going.
Once we go TLP, I imagine a few would head in our direction, whereas
until we
On 4/3/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the end should be nigh for Jakarta (those on private@ will
have seen a thread in which I side-topic'd with the feeling that the
end should be nigh for Jakarta). Previously I've suggested that
Commons should flatten into Jakarta and that
+1 to all said. I could even help.
-0 to waiting until we have a clear idea about the rest of Jakarta as
this is likely to never happen. Maybe a clearer idea will form after
commons leaves Jakarta.
Oliver
2007/4/3, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 4/2/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 4/2/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So with that said - I'd like to propose that we move to commons.apache.org.
>
+1
We have talked about this lots of times before and some discussions
have had us breaking commons itself apar
On 4/2/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the end should be nigh for Jakarta (those on private@ will
have seen a thread in which I side-topic'd with the feeling that the
end should be nigh for Jakarta). Previously I've suggested that
Commons should flatten into Jakarta and that
I think the end should be nigh for Jakarta (those on private@ will
have seen a thread in which I side-topic'd with the feeling that the
end should be nigh for Jakarta). Previously I've suggested that
Commons should flatten into Jakarta and that Jakarta should become a
general 'Java components' pro
33 matches
Mail list logo
