On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 13:07 -0500, Michael Heuer wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> > On 11/12/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:44 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > > > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > > > has anyone run a l
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/12/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:44 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > > has anyone run a long stress test?
> > > >
> > > > if not, i'm willing to code up som
On 11/12/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:44 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > has anyone run a long stress test?
> > >
> > > if not, i'm willing to code up something and set it running on my debian
> > > box for a
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:44 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > has anyone run a long stress test?
> >
> > if not, i'm willing to code up something and set it running on my debian
> > box for a few days. i'd appreciate a second pair of eyes on the code (to
> > avoid
robert burrell donkin wrote:
has anyone run a long stress test?
if not, i'm willing to code up something and set it running on my debian
box for a few days. i'd appreciate a second pair of eyes on the code (to
avoid mistakes).
My attempt at one is attached to bugzilla - SoakLRUMap. I've only r
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 00:18 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > is it time to take seriously the possibility of a bug in synchronisation
> > being an explanation?
> I've added a comment to bugzilla.
has anyone run a long stress test?
if not, i'm willing to code
opers List
Subject: Re: [collections] any objections?
robert burrell donkin wrote:
>>The removeIndex is the index of the hash bucket, not the hash code. This
>>bit of code is simply trying to find the entry before that we want to
>>remove, where we already know the entry we want to re
robert burrell donkin wrote:
The removeIndex is the index of the hash bucket, not the hash code. This
bit of code is simply trying to find the entry before that we want to
remove, where we already know the entry we want to remove.
got that bit but missed the use of header to store order links
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 00:38 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:39 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > the reported issues seem only to occur when synchronizedMap is used. has
> > anyone looked for a pattern in JVM versions?
> No, not yet
>
> > or
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:39 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
the reported issues seem only to occur when synchronizedMap is used. has
anyone looked for a pattern in JVM versions?
No, not yet
or tried to replicate using a multi-threaded test rig?
Bugzilla contains a basic
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:39 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Big +1. Agree with Stephen and share frustration over 32573. I have
> spent quite a few hours trying to replicate or "prove" that the only
> way to make this happen is via unsynchronized access.
proving that would be tough :-/
the report
robert burrell donkin wrote:
had it in mind just to add some more material to a few classes i was
using yesterday.
Well, all improvements are welcome!
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:39 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Big +1. Agree with Stephen and share frustration over 32573. I have
> spent quite a few hours trying to replicate or "prove" that the only
> way to make this happen is via unsynchronized access. Another set of
> eyes on that issue would be
Big +1. Agree with Stephen and share frustration over 32573. I have
spent quite a few hours trying to replicate or "prove" that the only
way to make this happen is via unsynchronized access. Another set of
eyes on that issue would be great. That code could also use some doco
improvements, so if
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i'd like to dive in with some improvements to the javadocs. i'm going
add myself to the list of committers and get started sometime soonish.
+1
so now would be a good time for people to jump in with any objections,
comments or warnings...
Apart from LRUMap's prob
i'd like to dive in with some improvements to the javadocs. i'm going
add myself to the list of committers and get started sometime soonish.
so now would be a good time for people to jump in with any objections,
comments or warnings...
- robert
-
16 matches
Mail list logo
