On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 15:05, Henri Yandell wrote:
...
>
> Looking at it, and thinking in the usual stop-start way, we have a
> jdbc2pool project, so assuming that is okay, then jdbcutils is okay [to
> match beanutils].
>
I didn't consult with a lawyer when creating the project. The code from
jd
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 18:05:08 -0500 (EST)
> From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
57 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [jdbc] JdbcUtil etc
>
>
>
> DbUtils?
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Given all the recent issues about our responsibilities wrt legal
> > issues, I think that using a Sun T
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@;generationjava.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 5:06 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [jdbc] JdbcUtil etc
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Steven
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@;generationjava.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:42 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [jdbc] JdbcUtil etc
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
> 5)
public static Long readLong(ResultSet rs, int index) throws SQLException {
Long result = new Long(rs.getLong(index));
if (rs.wasNull()) {
return null;
} else {
return result;
}
}
public static void setLong(PreparedStatement pstmt, int index, Long value) throws
SQLException
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > For beans, the solution was to call it beanutil, so perhaps we should
> > call it jdbcutil.
> >
>
> Looking at the Sun website, the JDBC acronym is clearly trademarked on its
> webpage so we need another name.
>
> I'll ask the question on Gene
gt; > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > subject: RE: [jdbc] JdbcUtil etc
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Steven Caswell wrote:
> >
> > > I don't know of anything that already exists, and I've looked around
> > > Jakarta a little bi
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Given all the recent issues about our responsibilities wrt legal
> issues, I think that using a Sun Trademark (is it a trademark?) for
> one of our released products could cause problems. If jdbc is
> preferred, I think that it should be checked wit
beans, the solution was to call it beanutil, so perhaps we should call it jdbcutil.
Stephen
> from:Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> date:Fri, 08 Nov 2002 22:05:53
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> subject: RE: [jdbc] JdbcUtil etc
>
> On Fri, 8
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Steven Caswell wrote:
> I don't know of anything that already exists, and I've looked around
> Jakarta a little bit to find one. I'd love to see a jdbc subproject.
> I've got a few things I could throw in as well. So I'm +1 that such
> a thing should exist, +1 for calling it
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@;generationjava.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 1:17 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [jdbc] JdbcUtil etc
>
>
>
> Does anyone know of a good apache-style license set of
>
Does anyone know of a good apache-style license set of classes for helping
with JDBC stuff?
I'm thinking of things like:
1) A JdbcUtils which helps with closing rs, stat, conn. That simplifies
MetaData work, that has a ResultSetIterator [yes I know BeanUtils has one
of these, it's misplaced I th
13 matches
Mail list logo
