David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31/12/2003 07:41:31 AM:
--- Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net
also.
I say we leave the last release as 1.1 compatible and move on to
using
1.4+ for new versions.
On 30-Dec-03, at 22:08 Uhr, Phil Steitz wrote:
David Graham wrote:
There will always be users that will complain when changing Java
versions.
The only semi-valid reason I've heard to not upgrade to 1.4 is that
product X requires 1.3 and product X is expensive.
Where often Product X is a
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
Here is a recent TSS survey of J2EE containers that shows jdk levels
supported by different containers:
http://www.theserverside.com/reviews/matrix.jsp
Please be careful when relying on these -- for example, it doesn't have
tomcat 5. ;) I wish there was some sort
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geir Magnusson
Jr writes:
Don't forget that not all platforms have 1.4 or a mature 1.4 that
people trust. it too a while for apple to get 1.4 out to OS X - I
wouldn't use OS X in production of course, but it's my development
platform...
Absolutely. J2SE 1.4
This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net also.
I say we leave the last release as 1.1 compatible and move on to using
1.4+ for new versions.
Personally, I use JVM 1.4+, myself. However, everytime we do a survey on
server-user, we get emphatic feedback from our
Our current server (ActiveMath) is blocked entirely by JDK 1.4: it's a
server with slightly too heavy memory requirements and the result is...
OutOfMemoryError on most Unix-VMs if in JDK 1.4. (especially true on
MacOSX, very frequent on Sun and Blackdown's on Linux).
Hence the wish not to
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 12:45 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Moving up to JVM 1.4+
Our current server (ActiveMath) is blocked entirely by JDK 1.4: it's a
server with slightly too heavy memory requirements and the result is...
OutOfMemoryError on most Unix-VMs
--- Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net
also.
I say we leave the last release as 1.1 compatible and move on to using
1.4+ for new versions.
Personally, I use JVM 1.4+, myself. However, everytime we do a survey
On Dec 30, 2003, at 3:41 PM, David Graham wrote:
--- Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net
also.
I say we leave the last release as 1.1 compatible and move on to
using
1.4+ for new versions.
Personally, I use JVM 1.4+,
The block on 1.4 remains the big-iron webservers, like Websphere and
Weblogic. 1.4 as a requirement is a long way off yet IMHO.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net
also.
I say we
David Graham wrote:
There will always be users that will complain when changing Java versions.
The only semi-valid reason I've heard to not upgrade to 1.4 is that
product X requires 1.3 and product X is expensive.
Where often Product X is a commerical J2EE container (see below) and
what is
. For new JRE versions, on certain OS's, that means OS
patches. For our OS/400 and S/390 customers this is a BIG deal.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 09:07
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Moving up to JVM
. For our OS/400 and S/390 customers this is a BIG
deal.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 09:07
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Moving up to JVM 1.4+
This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio
Quoting Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The block on 1.4 remains the big-iron webservers, like Websphere and
Weblogic. 1.4 as a requirement is a long way off yet IMHO.
FWIW, one of the major roadblocks for the app server vendors was that J2EE 1.4
(which in turn requires J2SE 1.4)
14 matches
Mail list logo