Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-16 Thread Tom Schindl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 oh. and the last VariableFormatter now really working. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDAlIUkVPeOFLgZFIRAp9PAJ9/VFwjRFT62dF+dmREvbsHV3L0pQCgrYmm g2j

Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-16 Thread Tom Schindl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello Tom: > > Please provide unit tests. I want to see this code in action in order to > figure out what the intent of the class really is. > > Thanks, > Gary > > No. A very limited one but the idea should be clear ;-) -

RE: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-16 Thread Gary Gregory
arta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gary Gregory wrote: > > Tom: > > > > If you'd like to make things easier for me, what you could do is > > resub

Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-16 Thread Tom Schindl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary Gregory wrote: > Tom: > > If you'd like to make things easier for me, what you could do is > resubmit your patches against the current code base. I'll try to take a > look tonight or tomorrow night. > > Thanks, > Gary > Hi Gary, I haven't pat

RE: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-16 Thread Gary Gregory
ay, August 16, 2005 9:36 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter > > Hello Tom: > > I'm very busy for the next 2 weeks with my real job, so I cannot > guarantee anything. Feel free to post and I or someone wil

RE: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-16 Thread Gary Gregory
day, August 16, 2005 3:23 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gary Gregory wrote: > > In a day or so, a new version will be in SVN, and I should be

Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-16 Thread Tom Schindl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary Gregory wrote: > In a day or so, a new version will be in SVN, and I should be able to > chat about this other feature. Thanks for your patience. > > Gary Hi, I saw that a new version of VariableFormatter is in SVN. What I've done now is to sub

RE: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-09 Thread Gary Gregory
st > Subject: Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gary Gregory schrieb: > > Hi Tom: > > > > I'm in the middle of work and integrating a rework from Oliver on free > > time, so I

Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-09 Thread Tom Schindl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary Gregory schrieb: > Hi Tom: > > I'm in the middle of work and integrating a rework from Oliver on free > time, so I cannot look at this at the moment. I'll try to peek tonight. > > Cheers, > Gary > > [...] no problem I simply need some pointe

RE: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-09 Thread Gary Gregory
52 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gary Gregory schrieb: > > Hello: > [...] > > > Simon's full message is here: > > htt

Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-09 Thread Tom Schindl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary Gregory schrieb: > Hello: [...] > Simon's full message is here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg63493.html > > Gary > Ok. Thanks for clearing up this so what's with the proposed formating of substiution values.

RE: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-09 Thread Gary Gregory
--Original Message- > From: Tom Schindl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 4:12 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Oliv

Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-09 Thread Tom Schindl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oliver Heger schrieb: > Tom Schindl wrote: > >> Stephen Colebourne schrieb: >> >> >Please prefix emails by [lang] > [...] > An alternative would be to provide an additional implementation of the > VariableResolver interface. The default implementation

Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-06 Thread Oliver Heger
Tom Schindl wrote: Stephen Colebourne schrieb: >Please prefix emails by [lang] >Tom Schindl wrote: >>I just found out that this project has exactly what I was searching >>for long time because MessageFormat doesn't really suite my needs. >> >>I see that this Class has been added in 2.2: >>---

Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-04 Thread Tom Schindl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Colebourne schrieb: > Please prefix emails by [lang] > > Tom Schindl wrote: > >> I just found out that this project has exactly what I was searching >> for long time because MessageFormat doesn't really suite my needs. >> >> I see that this C

Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-04 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Please prefix emails by [lang] Tom Schindl wrote: I just found out that this project has exactly what I was searching for long time because MessageFormat doesn't really suite my needs. I see that this Class has been added in 2.2: a. Is there any pla

Questions concerning VariableFormatter

2005-08-02 Thread Tom Schindl
Hi, I just found out that this project has exactly what I was searching for long time because MessageFormat doesn't really suite my needs. I see that this Class has been added in 2.2: a. Is there any plan when 2.2 is released b. What would be with a