th this entire thread. Take my
comments as a +1 for the Strategy suggestion then :-).
David
>
> Phil
>
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >>Gary
> >>
> >>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAI
Gary Gregory wrote:
I've finally had time to catch up on this interesting and important thread
and would like to weigh in by splitting the issue into two topics.
(1) [commons-id]
Clearly, identifiers, universal, unique, global, IETF, and MS
GUID-compatible will make for a nice standalone [commo
different views on this topic.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 13:22
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
>
>
> --- Gary G
essage-
From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 22:50
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
Hi Phil,
I'm away for several days. I agree on the "clean room" uuid - I
actually
got
something
; From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 22:50
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
> >
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > I'm away for several days. I agree o
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 12:49
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
[snip]
> (2) Providing a better System.curren
> Gary
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 22:50
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
> >
> > Hi Phil,
e
article or provide the best (eventhough hybrid) solution.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 22:50
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
>
>
Tim Reilly wrote:
Hi Phil,
I'm away for several days. I agree on the "clean room" uuid - I actually got
something together last night. I'll have better connectivity after the 1st
of the year, hope to share more then.
Good. I am about to commit the files for the initial commons sandbox,
including
PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:24 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
>
>
> Tim Reilly wrote:
>
> Sorry for the response latency. See interspersed.
>
> > I guess the short answer is..
From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Any ideas where UUID generation should go? Unless I hear a better
> suggestion, I will open up a sandbox project to get things started.
+1
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
day, December 17, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
Phil Steitz wrote:
Tim Reilly wrote:
Phil, Tim, et al,
I just added the thread lifecycle handling to the *draft*
UuidClock.java I'd
started
For the timestamp of a version 1
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I would suggest that:
ID generation fits in [lang]
UUID generation does not
In other words, UUID generation with threads, timers, native code, internet
specs to follow is just not [lang]-like. However a simple incrementing
number/alpha id system could very well be [l
essage-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:14 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
>
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Tim Reilly wrote:
> >
Pondering on the code we currently have for this.
[and because I was grepping for 'public interface', which I don't think
Lang should have much of]
I'm not convinced that the ID stuff fits Lang's style. It has a similar
style to Collections code [public interfaces, XxxUtils as a facade to
implem
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:
> __matthewHawthorne wrote:
> > I've taken a look at some of the uid code that is currently in [lang].
> > Are we all convinced that these types of classes are definitely a good
> > fit for the project? I think that they're a bit out of scope. However,
>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:12 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?
>
>
> Tim Reilly wrote:
> > Phil, Tim, et al,
> >
> > I just added the thread lifecycle handling to the *draft*
>
I've taken a look at some of the uid code that is currently in [lang].
Are we all convinced that these types of classes are definitely a good
fit for the project? I think that they're a bit out of scope. However,
the obvious problem is -- where else in commons to put them?
Phil Steitz wrote
Tim Reilly wrote:
Phil, Tim, et al,
I just added the thread lifecycle handling to the *draft* UuidClock.java I'd
started
For the timestamp of a version 1 uuid.
I'll share it here.
I realize it needs more work. I haven't tested it yet, but I wanted to get
some feedback before I do more.
I'm not a c
19 matches
Mail list logo
