Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-24 Thread David Graham
th this entire thread. Take my comments as a +1 for the Strategy suggestion then :-). David > > Phil > > > > > David > > > > > >>Gary > >> > >> > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAI

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-24 Thread Phil Steitz
Gary Gregory wrote: I've finally had time to catch up on this interesting and important thread and would like to weigh in by splitting the issue into two topics. (1) [commons-id] Clearly, identifiers, universal, unique, global, IETF, and MS GUID-compatible will make for a nice standalone [commo

RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-24 Thread Gary Gregory
different views on this topic. Gary > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 13:22 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? > > > --- Gary G

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-24 Thread Phil Steitz
essage- From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 22:50 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? Hi Phil, I'm away for several days. I agree on the "clean room" uuid - I actually got something

RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-24 Thread David Graham
; From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 22:50 > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? > > > > Hi Phil, > > > > I'm away for several days. I agree o

RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-24 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 12:49 > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? [snip] > (2) Providing a better System.curren

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-24 Thread Stephen Colebourne
> Gary > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 22:50 > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? > > > > Hi Phil,

RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-24 Thread Gary Gregory
e article or provide the best (eventhough hybrid) solution. Gary > -Original Message- > From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 22:50 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? > >

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-24 Thread Phil Steitz
Tim Reilly wrote: Hi Phil, I'm away for several days. I agree on the "clean room" uuid - I actually got something together last night. I'll have better connectivity after the 1st of the year, hope to share more then. Good. I am about to commit the files for the initial commons sandbox, including

RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-23 Thread Tim Reilly
PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:24 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? > > > Tim Reilly wrote: > > Sorry for the response latency. See interspersed. > > > I guess the short answer is..

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-22 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Any ideas where UUID generation should go? Unless I hear a better > suggestion, I will open up a sandbox project to get things started. +1 Stephen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-22 Thread Phil Steitz
day, December 17, 2003 9:14 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? Phil Steitz wrote: Tim Reilly wrote: Phil, Tim, et al, I just added the thread lifecycle handling to the *draft* UuidClock.java I'd started For the timestamp of a version 1

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-22 Thread Phil Steitz
Stephen Colebourne wrote: I would suggest that: ID generation fits in [lang] UUID generation does not In other words, UUID generation with threads, timers, native code, internet specs to follow is just not [lang]-like. However a simple incrementing number/alpha id system could very well be [l

RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-18 Thread Tim Reilly
essage- > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:14 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? > > > Phil Steitz wrote: > > Tim Reilly wrote: > >

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-18 Thread Henri Yandell
Pondering on the code we currently have for this. [and because I was grepping for 'public interface', which I don't think Lang should have much of] I'm not convinced that the ID stuff fits Lang's style. It has a similar style to Collections code [public interfaces, XxxUtils as a facade to implem

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-18 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Phil Steitz wrote: > __matthewHawthorne wrote: > > I've taken a look at some of the uid code that is currently in [lang]. > > Are we all convinced that these types of classes are definitely a good > > fit for the project? I think that they're a bit out of scope. However, >

RE: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-16 Thread Tim Reilly
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:12 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator? > > > Tim Reilly wrote: > > Phil, Tim, et al, > > > > I just added the thread lifecycle handling to the *draft* >

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-16 Thread __matthewHawthorne
I've taken a look at some of the uid code that is currently in [lang]. Are we all convinced that these types of classes are definitely a good fit for the project? I think that they're a bit out of scope. However, the obvious problem is -- where else in commons to put them? Phil Steitz wrote

Re: [lang] UUID Generator - was RE: UUID Generator?

2003-12-16 Thread Phil Steitz
Tim Reilly wrote: Phil, Tim, et al, I just added the thread lifecycle handling to the *draft* UuidClock.java I'd started For the timestamp of a version 1 uuid. I'll share it here. I realize it needs more work. I haven't tested it yet, but I wanted to get some feedback before I do more. I'm not a c