Re: _Commons-Attributes_(sandbox)_and_Jon_Tirsén.

2003-06-10 Thread James Strachan
I'll help all I can too (and I'll try get those patches Paul sent me off my old laptop...) On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 12:11 pm, Paul Hammant wrote: Well I volunteer to help this get promoted out of sandbox. I've done work on it before (pairing with James Strachan - which he never committed -

Re: _Commons-Attributes_(sandbox)_and_Jon_Tirsén.

2003-06-08 Thread Juozas Baliuka
- Original Message - From: "Jon Tirsén" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 9:58 PM Subject: Re: _Commons-Attributes_(sandbox)_and_Jon_Tirsén. > Why implement something that's J

Re: _Commons-Attributes_(sandbox)_and_Jon_Tirsén.

2003-06-08 Thread Paul Hammant
Jon, My aim would be to see a merge of both forks of your work. Granted we have done work here, but then so have you. JSK 1.5 is not somthing I'd stop work here for. Nor would I think it is compelling to merge all OSS attrtibutes efforts. As I think is you opinion, lets just go for a update to

Re: _Commons-Attributes_(sandbox)_and_Jon_Tirsén.

2003-06-08 Thread Jon Tirsén
Why implement something that's JSR175-compliant? That's gonna be part of JDK1.5 anyway. Besides it's probably not doable since it requires a language-change. Attrib4J and JSR175 has tons of extra stuff where I've always seen commons-attributes (and Nanning) as extremely simplistic, ie named attrib

Re: _Commons-Attributes_(sandbox)_and_Jon_Tirsén.

2003-06-08 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 03:48 PM, Ryan Hoegg wrote: I am currently a committer on ws.apache.org/xmlrpc. Can I help? like anyone else you can help out as a developer ;) i'm not an commons-attributes committer, so others will have to answer whether they'd be happy to have you on-board as a

Re: _Commons-Attributes_(sandbox)_and_Jon_Tirsén.

2003-06-08 Thread Ryan Hoegg
I have e-mailed briefly with Mark Pollack of attrib4j.sourceforge.net. It seems some work needs to be done to support JSR175 for both commons-attributes and attrib4j. The main difference Jon and Mark have so far is the Attribute interface, where Mark would rather not have String properties fo

Re: Re:_Commons-Attributes_(sandbox)_and_Jon_Tirsén.

2003-06-08 Thread Jon Tirsén
Fine by me. The code is pretty clean by now and I guess people are using it. Maybe remove the dependency on commons-logging and that's it. (I think QDox is the only other dependency...?) The code in Nanning looks quite a bit different but the only major changes I've done are using the lower-level

Re:_Commons-Attributes_(sandbox)_and_Jon_Tirsén.

2003-06-08 Thread Paul Hammant
Well I volunteer to help this get promoted out of sandbox. I've done work on it before (pairing with James Strachan - which he never committed - grumble grumble ;) Jon, that sound good to you ? - Paul --- robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm against nominating committers for