Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, James Strachan wrote: - Cut Here - I vote as follows on moving Jelly to the Commons Proper: [X] +1 - I support this move and am willing to help I will add this to the set of commons packages I build nightly, and to

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 02:13 PM, James Strachan wrote: - Cut Here - I vote as follows on moving Jelly to the Commons Proper: [X] +1 - I support this move and am willing to help [ ] +0 - I support this move, but cannot assist [ ] -0 - I don't support this move [ ] -1 - I vote

was: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

James Strachan wrote: The Jelly code base has been stable for some time and it'd be good to get a stable release of Jelly out so other projects like Maven, Cactus and Latka can depend on a stable, supported release. So I'd like to propose that Jelly be moved to the commons proper where we can

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

+1 Mvgr, Martin On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 15:13, James Strachan wrote: The Jelly code base has been stable for some time and it'd be good to get a stable release of Jelly out so other projects like Maven, Cactus and Latka can depend on a stable, supported release. So I'd like to propose that

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

From: Tomasz Pik [EMAIL PROTECTED] James Strachan wrote: The Jelly code base has been stable for some time and it'd be good to get a stable release of Jelly out so other projects like Maven, Cactus and Latka can depend on a stable, supported release. So I'd like to propose that Jelly be

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

+0 - Original Message - From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 4:13 PM Subject: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper The Jelly code base has been stable for some time and it'd be good to get a stable

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 09:13 AM, James Strachan wrote: The Jelly code base has been stable for some time and it'd be good to get a stable release of Jelly out so other projects like Maven, Cactus and Latka can depend on a stable, supported release. So I'd like to propose that Jelly

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

-bob I vote as follows on moving Jelly to the Commons Proper: [x] +1 - I support this move and am willing to help [ ] +0 - I support this move, but cannot assist [ ] -0 - I don't support this move [ ] -1 - I vote against this move (requires valid *technical* reasoning) -- To

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 09:13, James Strachan wrote: The Jelly code base has been stable for some time and it'd be good to get a stable release of Jelly out so other projects like Maven, Cactus and Latka can depend on a stable, supported release. So I'd like to propose that Jelly be moved to the

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, James Strachan wrote: - Cut Here - I vote as follows on moving Jelly to the Commons Proper: [X] +1 - I support this move and am willing to help I will add this to the set of commons packages I build nightly, and to the commons-combo package (that builds a

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, James Strachan wrote: - Cut Here - I vote as follows on moving Jelly to the Commons Proper: [X] +1 - I support this move and am willing to help [ ] +0 - I support this move, but cannot assist [ ] -0 - I don't support this move [ ] -1 - I vote against this move

Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper

I vote as follows on moving Jelly to the Commons Proper: [X] +1 - I support this move and am willing to help [ ] +0 - I support this move, but cannot assist [ ] -0 - I don't support this move [ ] -1 - I vote against this move (requires valid *technical* reasoning) -- dIon Gillard,