RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient TestAuthenticator.java TestHttpState.java TestHttps.java TestMethodsExternalHost.java TestWebappBasicAuth.java

ttpClient Project > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta- > commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient > TestAuthenticator.java TestHttpState.java TestHttps.java > TestMethodsExternalHost.java TestWebappBasicAuth.java > > Just a few comments. > > The current pl

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient TestAuthenticator.java TestHttpState.java TestHttps.java TestMethodsExternalHost.java TestWebappBasicAuth.java

Just a few comments. The current plans for 2.1 are fairly modest and most of the changes can be made with little or no API modifications. The exceptions are: Taken from

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient TestAuthenticator.java TestHttpState.java TestHttps.java TestMethodsExternalHost.java TestWebappBasicAuth.java

> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 July 2003 13:46 > To: Commons HttpClient Project > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta- > commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient > TestAuthenticator.java TestHttpStat

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient

Jeffrey Dever wrote: > We really have 3 different type of tests: > nohost: those that run entirely within the test JVM > remote: those that hit some number public internet resources > webapp: those that require the httpclient .war deployed in a container Yes, quite so. > There is nothing special

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient

Jeffrey Dever wrote: We really have 3 different type of tests: nohost: those that run entirely within the test JVM remote: those that hit some number public internet resources webapp: those that require the httpclient .war deployed in a container Yes, quite so. There is nothing special about the h

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient

2003 14:57 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient Thanks Oleg. I had not realized how big this was until I committed the patch. I would have posted it for review if I had realized. I have some more plans for w

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient

demarcation lines into no-host, local-host, and external packages as a fist step Cheers Oleg -Original Message- From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 14:57 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient

: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient Thanks Oleg. I had not realized how big this was until I committed the patch. I would have posted it for review if I had realized. I have some more plans for work in the test

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient

Thanks Oleg. I had not realized how big this was until I committed the patch. I would have posted it for review if I had realized. I have some more plans for work in the test code. I will post some ideas before I get to work. Please let me know if you have any ideas about how we can improve

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient

Mike This is massive!!! It's a much needed and welcome refactoring. Many thanks for this work Oleg -Original Message- From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 5. März 2003 05:34 To: Commons Project Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/co

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient TestMethodsNoHost.java TestWebappPostMethod.java

Hi Oleg, You seems like got an answer... ;) BTW, the default should be just an default, when there is no set-up to be referred. That would be happened to be considered for the running configuration on the runtime...for applications or threads. Sung-Gu > +public static final String DEFAUL