On Aug 11, 2009, at 8:24 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
1024 bit keys and SHA-1 links are currently considered safe so there's
no reason to believe that apache keys have been compromised.
transition
statements [1] in a trusted location will probably be good enough to
convince most people to
The Java Service Wrapper is being used (and sometimes redistributed) by
many of our Java projects (ActiveMQ, ServiceMix, Geronimo, OFBiz,
Tomcat).
It was formerly available under an MIT/BSD style license, as can be seen
in the 3.2.3 version at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wrapper/
More
On Jun 28, 2007, at 8:32 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
I have a question about this part of the guidelines:
Project source code and documentation must be donated to the ASF
under a
moin-www.png
Contributor's License Agreement. Donated source code and
documentation must carry the ASF
On Jul 28, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail list was created in August 2005; the initial
charter is at http://wiki.apache.org/Women/InitialCharter .
We now want to take it to the next step and create a formal committee
(see the forwarded post below).
On Dec 16, 2005, at 5:17 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
derby-user@db.apache.org has been grappling with someone who
delights in belittling other posters on the list. The topic was
raised on women@ (see the thread starting with http://mail-
On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:28 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
For crying out loud, would you please supply links to the exact posts
you consider to be in poor taste and the person's name? I just
wasted
10 minutes trying to follow the bread crumbs. You have to make it
easier on reviewers -- everyone
Under no circumstances is it EVER appropriate to cc a private list
when talking in public, or cc a public list when talking in private.
I don't care why you think it is appropriate to hit two audiences
in a single mail, or why you think your time is more important than
everyone else's combined,
proud of what we have accomplished
and very grateful to have met so many friends along the way.
Cheers,
Roy T. Fieldinghttp://roy.gbiv.com/
Chief Scientist, Day Software http://www.day.com
May be of interest to Santiago and friends ... note the prize is a
research grant.
Roy
Begin forwarded message:
From: Marie-Claire Forgue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: October 27, 2004 12:31:38 AM PDT
Subject: W3C Spanish Offices Standards Tour 2004 to Visit Ten Cities
Throughout (News Release)
A few weeks ago, many people encouraged Niclas Hedhman not to bring
private matters into the public here. Now, some people want this
issue brought into public, whereas others say it should be handled
only with the Incubator PMC, or possibly the Board.
The general at incubator mailing list is a
Cutting a release jar/tarball is an individual act, regardless of
the person's status as being a committer, on the PMC, or an Apache
member. Because none of us are employees, we do not have the right
to make acts on behalf of the ASF (the only exception is ASF officers,
who are granted that right
A proposed Free Software Act provides an alternative to addressing
software licensing through the copyright process.
http://www.linuxworld.com/story/44100.htm?DE=1
Just kind of an interesting read. Especially if you are Roy, and
understand
all of the big words. ;-)
Interesting, though the
For those who have not seen it - there are some guidelines (thanks to
Roy!) on applying the 2.0 license to code at :
http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
Not just me -- thanks to Berin as well, for providing the first draft
and getting me off my butt to finish it.
Roy
Roy Fielding once mentioned that anyone with a history of at least 6
months of sustained contributions was entitled to ASF membership.
Not entitled -- deserving of nomination for membership. It still has
to be voted on by all of the members, since we are effectively giving
that person an equal
You wouldn't believe how many are being caught on their way to
apache.org
addresses; my spamfilter also catches messages bearing this virus.
Thousands per day. Hundreds alone to people like myself, Roy, Ralf,
and
many jakarta mailing lists.
Many of the messages do not have attachments, though,
The question is: is that enough to defeat GPL's virality? I'm starting
to
Defeat isn't quite the right word. It is actually distributed under two
licenses, one for unmodified and one for with-modifications. The Apache
license also does that, though in our case they are just two clauses in
a
Does anyone know why JBoss isn't being granted the scholarship? I
read the Happiness is here today JCP 2.5 announcement
(http://java.sun.com/features/2002/10/new_jcp.html) again and it says
qualified achedemic, non-profit and opensource members.
I am not sure about the announcement text, but I
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 12:30 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I believe Classpath has a special exception for distribution, but,
AIUI, that isn't typical of FSF packages.
I agree. The only issue for me is whether or not the Classpath
packages are
a suitable special case that we can use.
What I find strange in all this discussion about tools that are
licensed under
LGPL is, why does it matter if you do not use the tool in the actual
code of
the project.
It does not matter in that case. It only matters when use of the code
restricts the license under which our own code is
Can I explore the issue a little bit further? The question that
usually arises on Ant is not the storing and distribution of LGPL code
itself, but the storing of code that links with or depends on the
LGPL code. As an example, let's say we want to provide an SSH task for
Ant (a recent
The import statement alone is sufficient to make the source code a
work based on the Library, which means we could distribute under the
terms of section 6. Those terms are viral and disallow binary-only
releases, making our product viral because the Apache license does
not require redistribution
infrastructure, can we have a new mail list called
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears to have been set up this morning with only you subscribed.
Roy
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
read this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
fully subscribe to this
23 matches
Mail list logo
