There's a couple of things being mixed in here.
* Development Environment
* Application Stack
For the development environment, if the project is open source,
there's Google Code, and so forth. There's also all-on-tools like Trac
that you can install on your own server, or subscription
In the course of working on various development projects for various
clients, it's not uncommon to need to store a number of account credentials
that need to be shared with various members of a team. One product I've used
is Password Saver http://www.pwdsaver.com/. It's a decent product, but its
In a followup to Zed Shaw's recent Rant on Rails, Rickard Oberg has
some salient thoughts on how good communities go bad.
* http://www.jroller.com/rickard/date/20080106
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Forwarded upon request
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrew E. Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Aug 17, 2007 3:04 AM
Subject: Gelato ICE Singapore - Attendance, Speaking, and Marketing
Opportunities
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are seeking participation from Apache at Gelato ICE:
On 7/6/07, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't PMC Chair's either be (1) willing to respond or (2) able
find someone in their project? This isn't that onerous of a task and
it provides the PRC with a ready made list of contacts.
On the PRC list it was suggested that when someone
On 7/6/07, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My concern is only when such documents become additional rules or
bylaws and individuals start linking to them in their emails as
justification for why someone has or has not done their duty. Maybe
I'm just being picky and overly cautious.
The
On 6/30/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't a Code of Conduct, it's a top-level description of our ethos.
Yes, that's how it turned out. I started out to research a code of
conduct, and came back with a set of community guidelines that
describe how we expect people to
Can someone suggest a patch?
On 6/29/07, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 8:32 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
I have a question about this part of the guidelines:
Project source code and documentation must be donated to the ASF
under a
moin-www.png
Contributor's
Some of the ASF Members have indicated a wish to draft a code of
conduct. A working draft of a set of Community Guidelines is
available on the incubator wiki,
* http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CodeOfConduct
Any comments would be very welcome.
-Ted.
On 5/6/05, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SOP should be for the issue trackers to log all changes to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
What is SOP? dict.org is no help
Sorry: Standard Operating Procedure
True. JIRA does the right thing provided the changes are sent into a
public list.
On 5/5/05, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El jue, 05-05-2005 a las 16:11 -0400, Ted Husted escribió:
When you hook up Confluence with JIRA and Subversion, things start to
get very, very tasty.
Am I the only one that is worried because both JIRA and Bugzilla are
dark matter WRT
Yes, Confluence uses Textile.
I've been using Confluence/Textile at work for several months now,
and, IMHO, it's the fastest, best way for geeks-like-me to write
documents, especially technical documents.
When you hook up Confluence with JIRA and Subversion, things start to
get very, very
I suggest we simply drop the logos and hypertext links for all the mirrors.
We say that people who want to give back to Apache shouldn't care if we put
an @author link in the source code. (And I agree.)
So why not say that mirrors who want to give back to Apache shouldn't care if
we link to
Good point, Ken =:0)
I'll make the patch, but the document's been in committee for
some time now. I doubt that it will ever be adopted, since the
PMC will probably wait-and-see what the Incubator cranks out.
I put the proposal together a couple of years ago but ran out of
steam before ever
In the interest of precision, my vote on the second item was
actually 0 (not -1) [10/30/2002 09:30:10].
I personally believe the list should be open, but respect the
wishes of others who have a different opinion. At this point, I
thought it best to err on the side of inclusion (of the
10/30/2002 12:19:03 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
read this mail list thru a web archive?
[x] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you
10/31/2002 12:14:04 AM, Chuck Murcko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be that we don't trust each other to be working in each
others' best interests? I would hope they are common interests or
we are SOL. Implementations we can vote on all day, but trust and
common direction are either there or
10/29/2002 8:24:38 AM, Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With all due respect, you might be safer standing behind Jon
than Sam. What's the point of local governance if the
governing bodies are incapable of dealing with trivial issues
like this
one?
Joe, we're kidding. =:0)
As
18 matches
Mail list logo
