moko community discussion
Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
Hi Matt..
I think I get a sense of where you are coming from. As an engineer, one
thinks "oh no, here comes these marketing people with their unrealistic
requirements again." Been
Hi all,
although I am jumping in the middle of the discussion, I think I have
some valuable contributions
to bridge the engineering, marketing and community points of views.
Am 29.04.2008 um 20:03 schrieb Flemming Richter Mikkelsen:
On 4/29/08, Lowell Higley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When
x27;t think it
> was suggested that there was some kind of wall in the middle, that's
> ridiculous. But the best products come from a respect for the others roles
> and intense focus on what people are good at.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > __
t, and what is in the
> community's court regarding marketing... etc.
>
> In the meantime, let's roll out the FreeRunner and once it's out, well
> attack the next project publicly. Ok.. I'm going to sleep now. :) Cheers!
>
> Lowell
>
> On Mon, Apr
? I doubt it..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Flemming
Richter Mikkelsen
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 2:04 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
On 4/29/
On 4/29/08, Lowell Higley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I mean marketing is really just "how to sell"
> That statement could not be farther from the truth, IMHO. I think any Tech
I agree 100% with Lowell.
When I think of marketing I think of Apple and Google. Apple is for some
specific group
12:11 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
Ok.. I'm severely jet lagged but I will try to throw some closure on
this and hope it is coherent. Steve has been very cordial and
enlightening in his mails to me. The la
PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stroller
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:01 PM
> To: List for Openmoko community discussion
> Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
>
>
> On 28 Apr 2008, at 17:54, hank williams wrote:
>
thanks for explaining that to folks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stroller
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:01 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
On
r Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
Ryan Prior wrote:
> A synopsis:
>
> Lowell: "Let's make this project community-driven."
> Steve: "Please talk to me about it privately."
>
> WTF?
Perhaps
to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Prior
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 27, 2008 4:46 PM
> *To:* List for Openmoko community discussion
> *Subject:* Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
>
>
>
> A synopsis:
>
> Lowell: "Let's make this
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Prior
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 4:46 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
A synopsis:
Lowell: "Let's make this project community-driven."
Steve: "Please t
> Your argument is similar to suggesting Nike has superior
> engineering because they have the coolest shoes.
>
uhh... yes. The coolest shoes come from doing real *engineering*. Unless by
cool you just mean pretty colors. An *incredible* amount of engineering goes
into the creation of nike shoes.
ubject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Crane, Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Clever design != feat of engineering.
Matt
again, unless you have "engineered" a "clever desi
I was just hoping that if not a lot of phones get sold (mere thousands
or tens of thousands) OpenMoko still makes enough money to keep going,
and to design a sexy phone next time around, when there can be an
optimized case design rather than a leftover one, and when the
software is polished enough
On 28 Apr 2008, at 17:54, hank williams wrote:
I have to say my unvoiced thoughts were the same as Ryan's. I was
not at all clear why a call for the community to help figure
marketing stuff out would be met by a request to take the
discussion off list as though it was somehow inappropriate
008 4:26 PM
> *To:* List for Openmoko community discussion
> *Subject:* Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Crane, Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > There is nothing incredible about a
much of an argument.
Hank
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hank williams
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 1:52 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Communit
having a resume that suggests you have done so yourself, you really
> don't have much of an argument.
>
> Hank
>
>
> >
> > --
> > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *hank williams
> > *Sent:* Monday, April 28, 2008 1:52 PM
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *hank williams
> *Sent:* Monday, April 28, 2008 1:52 PM
> *To:* List for Openmoko community discussion
> *Subject:* Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
>
>
> I
1:52 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
If this is primarily a developer platform, why are there so many
intense opinions about such superficial things as color and marketing
anyways?
In to
And to be completely frank about about, I've found the tone of this thread
the ugliest thing going on!
I'm happy with just getting this phone so I can start developing for it, and
I've found most of the push on this thread extremely negative and
unproductive. I would guess that's why a private th
> If this is primarily a developer platform, why are there so many intense
> opinions about such superficial things as color and marketing anyways?
>
In today's world, there is *very* little daylight between marketing and
engineering. They are of a piece. The product design, the feature set, and
y
ancial risk for this particular product, imho.
Matt
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hank williams
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 12:54 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Engineering Driven vs. Community Driven (
hank williams wrote:
I have to say my unvoiced thoughts were the same as Ryan's. I was not at
all clear why a call for the community to help figure marketing stuff
out would be met by a request to take the discussion off list as though
it was somehow inappropriate for public discussion. It seem
I have to say my unvoiced thoughts were the same as Ryan's. I was not at all
clear why a call for the community to help figure marketing stuff out would
be met by a request to take the discussion off list as though it was somehow
inappropriate for public discussion. It seemed like a very strange re
> > I never said anything about a conspiracy - I just thought I'd point out
> that
> > it strikes me as strange to respond to somebody's call to open up a
> process
> > and involve the community by asking that person to make their
> communications
> > private!
>
> So according to you, it should not
On 4/28/08, Ryan Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The community list is for getting phones into peoples' hands? Where has the
> actual community discussion gone, then? If there is need for a special
> purpose list to get phones into peoples' hands, it would not be hard to
> create one. Besides, i
The community list is for getting phones into peoples' hands? Where has the
actual community discussion gone, then? If there is need for a special
purpose list to get phones into peoples' hands, it would not be hard to
create one. Besides, it's not hard to share mailing list bandwidth between
vario
Ryan Prior wrote:
A synopsis:
Lowell: "Let's make this project community-driven."
Steve: "Please talk to me about it privately."
WTF?
Perhaps you didn't read this part:
I'd rather take this offline with you, since the main focus here
[meaning, on this discussion list, at this time]
now
> is how to get the product that
>
> is actually built into people's hands.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Lowel
ngineering Driven vs. Community Driven (was Re: Ugliness)
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Lowell Higley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So please don't be offended but saying "I don't like
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Lowell Higley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >So please don't be offended but saying "I don't like it and neither do my
> friends" is totally irrelevant - come back when you've interviewed a
33 matches
Mail list logo
