Hi. I have an ongoing problem.
Declude-Sender screws up whitelisting.
Is there any way we can have the whitelists use the FROM address and NOT
just the Declude-Sender?
Whitelisting doesn't work much of the time because increasingly, firms are
using mailing list
services instead of their
Hi Carl,
The sender is easily forged, this is why Declude specifically looks at
the sender in the envelope and not the FROM line, this is by design.
The PRE-TESTED filter was/is a temporary fix for the pre-tested spam, if
you are using it in conjunction with the GOOD-REVDNS you would not be
All I know is that the PRE-TESTED filter thinks a Thrifty is a spammer
coming from this 3rd party mailer.
I am concerned, any firm that uses a 3rd party mailer deserves
unreliability.
But my customers have no clue.
It would still be nice if some kind of whitelisting was available based on
st
Are you using the GOOD-REVDNS filter ?
I would disagree with your statement "yes it can be spoofed but no one
cares about that" this in fact would cause a huge influx of spam. How
many of your customers whitelist paypal.com or amazon.com or even their
own domains ? You would be opening the do
Ok thanks.
Excellent.
Will look into my own filter with the PCRE (?im:From:.+@example.com)
Yes, I have GOOD-REVDNS on, but had to lower its weight because people were
losing mail.
People freak out more if they are losing mail than if they are getting
phishing
(but only because they haven't s
Not sure what you mean by lower the weight of GOOD-REVDNS ??
The GOOD-REVDNS provides credit for good senders, I am not sure I
understand how people would be losing their email because of it. If
anything it should allow good senders to get to the users inbox.
The other option you have is to a
Oops sorry you are right.
I was thinking
REVDNSREVDNSEXISTS x x 10
0
Now I remember.
I did comment out all the 3rd party mailer entries in GOOD_REVDNS.txt
because frankly as soon as this was put in place for me (by Linda attempting
to
help me a
