Re: Mac longevity

2004-04-01 Thread Phil Beesley
On 31 Mar 2004, at 21:00, Jeff Walther wrote: I assume in the case you mention above that the chip in question was one-time-programable, OTP? An EEPROM which was mis-flashed should have been erasable unless the chip was destroyed, e.g. by applying the wrong voltage to the wrong pin or something

Re: Astronomy applications (was: Mac longevity)

2004-03-31 Thread Dr.O.M.Betz
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 01:55:00PM -0800, Robert Little wrote: I use that Plus for writing and even running some of the older astronomy apps. Did somebody say the "a" word. :-D Which astronomy applications will work on a compact Mac (say an SE or an SE/30), and be bearable with the small screen

Astronomy applications (was: Mac longevity)

2004-03-31 Thread Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 01:55:00PM -0800, Robert Little wrote: > I use that Plus for writing and even running some of the older > astronomy apps. Did somebody say the "a" word. :-D Which astronomy applications will work on a compact Mac (say an SE or an SE/30), and be bearable with the small scr

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-31 Thread Antonio Rodríguez
Hi, Jeff. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrito: > I assume in the case you mention above that the chip in question was > one-time-programable, OTP? An EEPROM which was mis-flashed should have > been erasable unless the chip was destroyed, e.g. by applying the wrong > voltage to the wrong pin or somethi

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-31 Thread Robert Little
I was joking about the collecting issue. Seriously, though, I use that Plus for writing and even running some of the older astronomy apps. I actually have an upgraded 128-to-a-Plus and a beige Plus, but my platinum late model Plus is the cat's meow. In our kitchen, there resides a Classic II that i

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-31 Thread trag
> From: Phil Beesley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:02:39 +0100 > Thanks for another informative post, Jeff. As far as programming > *EPROMs goes, how easy depends where you live in the world. Last year > or so, a work colleague mis-flashed an EEPROM in a PII motherboard. We > che

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-31 Thread Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 07:58:02AM -0800, Robert Little wrote: > To be honest, the whole ROM issue is one that I'd > question. There are no doubt a number of issues > regarding their lifespan, but many seem to proven > false. When you talk about the longevity of a manufactured product, you are tal

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-31 Thread Matt Jordan
> You mean you collect these things? Wow, I didn't know > that they were considered that quaint! Yes. I didn't start out wanting there to be a "collection" but one thing led to another and now there is a LocalTalk network downstairs. :-P > In the end, it's how you treat them. To use the old > r

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-31 Thread Robert Little
You mean you collect these things? Wow, I didn't know that they were considered that quaint! To be honest, the whole ROM issue is one that I'd question. There are no doubt a number of issues regarding their lifespan, but many seem to proven false. For instance, I own an Apple II+, manufacture date

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-30 Thread John-Robert La Porta
Yeah thats true. Some of us (like me) grew up with compacts (Apple IIs were old school for me, being born in '83). I get a new computer basically once every 3-4 years or so. I have a superdrive 15 inch iMac, iMac DV SE, and original iMac, to illustrate the every 3-4 years progression. Regardle

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-30 Thread Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:07:23PM -0500, Matt Jordan wrote: > more importantly: "How long will we care about them?" [snip] > A few years ago, the SE/30 (for example) was still very impressive (ok, > well - it still is) because it was so easily comparable to a PowerMac G4 > running the classic Ma

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-30 Thread John-Robert La Porta
Collectors will pay dearly and care for them as long as they hold some kind of value to the collectors. This is true for sure. While my goal is not financial gain through the long-term holding of old computers, this may turn out to be just the case. Like the people who hung onto Model T and A F

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-30 Thread Phil Beesley
On 30 Mar 2004, at 14:34, Jeff Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The good news is that there's probably a PC shop near you with an EEPROM programmer who can copy your ROMs to a few sets of EEPROMs for a modest price. Most non-volatile chips of a given size and organization have a pinout similar

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-30 Thread Jennifer Worgan
From: "Matt Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have recently begun to build an archive of old software for the Macs and began to wonder about this topic as well. Not just "how long will this Mac last" but more importantly: "How long will we care about them?" Those who fell in love with them may ca

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-30 Thread Matt Jordan
I have recently begun to build an archive of old software for the Macs and began to wonder about this topic as well. Not just "how long will this Mac last" but more importantly: "How long will we care about them?" I love working with compacts and being a college student many friends think it is

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-30 Thread J.S. Garrison
on 3/29/04 9:06 PM, Jeff Walther at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm not certain, but I think that true mask ROMs will last as long as > any other fixed content chip. The problem (I think) comes from > programmable devices. I have also heard the ~20 years lifetime. In > some cases, the "ROM" i

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-29 Thread John-Robert La Porta
Then again, we have to look at unplanned longevity as well. I have 60 year old radios with vacuum tubes that still function perfectly. No way were those tubes made to last for that long. Good care and good manufacturing can go along way. You just have to see how the components hold up. -John

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-29 Thread Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:06:14PM -0600, Jeff Walther wrote: > Does anyone understand why, ten years or more after the EOL for a > product, companies aren't willing to release these kinds of details > to the hobbyist community? It's not like they're ever going to use > that particular PAL des

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-29 Thread Jeff Walther
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:10:01 -0500 From: "Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:11:41PM +1000, Charles M Gascoigne wrote: I have a general question/topic for discussion - how long can compact macs last, and what can be done to maximise their lives? - ROM.

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-29 Thread J.S. Garrison
on 3/29/04 1:11 AM, Charles M Gascoigne at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a general question/topic for discussion - how long can compact > macs last, and what can be done to maximise their lives? I usually take > out hard drives to minimise heat, but are there any other measures or > general ma

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-29 Thread Stuart Bell
On 29 Mar 2004, at 10:11, Charles M Gascoigne wrote: I have a general question/topic for discussion - how long can compact macs last, and what can be done to maximise their lives? I usually take out hard drives to minimise heat, but are there any other measures or general maintenance which can

Re: Mac longevity

2004-03-29 Thread Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:11:41PM +1000, Charles M Gascoigne wrote: > I have a general question/topic for discussion - how long can compact > macs last, and what can be done to maximise their lives? I usually take > out hard drives to minimise heat, but are there any other measures or > general

Mac longevity

2004-03-29 Thread Charles M Gascoigne
I have a general question/topic for discussion - how long can compact macs last, and what can be done to maximise their lives? I usually take out hard drives to minimise heat, but are there any other measures or general maintenance which can be of help? Cheers, Charles -- Compact Macs is sponso