I'm glad that you found it. seems like winRate
would end up as 0 most of the time and thus
you'd make nearly random moves?
s.
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Excellent, I am glad you found the issue. I had a strong sense it
would be something like this.
This is a fairly common type of bug in software and is why I suggested
it, however I think it's the first time I've ever directed someone to
the
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 03:45 -0700, steve uurtamo wrote:
I'm glad that you found it. seems like winRate
would end up as 0 most of the time and thus
you'd make nearly random moves?
Yes, winRate would be 0.0 (unless every random simulation with that
point was a victory such as in late endgame).
Strangely enough, it now appears that hb-amaf-1k-v2 is significantly
stronger than genAnchor-1k, defeating it 9 out of 9 times. I still have
to wonder what the cause of the strength difference is.
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 08:52 -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
i don't mean necessarily that it isn't stronger, just that
now is the time to not worry so much about things.
if anything, try to make it even stronger!
you've got another 1200 ELO to go, after all.
s.
- Original Message
From: Jason House [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: computer-go
Good Evening,
Sorry, I think this may have been asked but can't find it
anywhere in the list archives. Anyone know of a good place to get a
large sgf game database?
Preferably master games or at least 1dan level or higher?
-Josh
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm starting to get curious. What are you doing that is causing it to
win 11 out of 11 against genAnchor_1k and yet it's only 113 ELO
stronger?And it's supposedly an identical program?I don't think
it's actually identical and I don't trust
