Jason House wrote:
I believe the original paper used 32 simulations from each point as
part of its pattern... But the spirit of it (as I understand it)
really is to bias the 1-ply move selection at the start of MC
searches. (In Crazy Stone, just 3x3 patterns are used at deeper ply?)
elife w
I believe the original paper used 32 simulations from each point as part
of its pattern... But the spirit of it (as I understand it) really is
to bias the 1-ply move selection at the start of MC searches. (In Crazy
Stone, just 3x3 patterns are used at deeper ply?)
elife wrote:
I think CrazyP
I think CrazyPattern does not do any simulation at all. It just predict the
move according pattern lib and Generalized Bradley-Terry model.
> Remi: it would be nice, if one could change the amount of simulations,
> altough I guess it has to be rather small so that those several hundred
> of games
It might be interesting to see how Rémi Coulom's move predictor does
on these positions.
Erik
You can now donwload it as a GTP engine from the page of the paper:
http://remi.coulom.free.fr/Amsterdam2007/
Rémi
I updated the game situation figures and included Crazy
Patterns curve to the a
Erik van der Werf wrote:
It might be interesting to see how Rémi Coulom's move predictor does
on these positions.
Erik
You can now donwload it as a GTP engine from the page of the paper:
http://remi.coulom.free.fr/Amsterdam2007/
Rémi
___
computer-go
Erik van der Werf wrote:
On 8/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I organized side event "Predict Professinal Moves" at
European Go Congress 2007. I made a brief and shallow
summary (without any analysis) of the results and decided
to post it here---in case someone is actually
On 8/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I organized side event "Predict Professinal Moves" at
> European Go Congress 2007. I made a brief and shallow
> summary (without any analysis) of the results and decided
> to post it here---in case someone is actually interested ;).
>
> The
uh, never mind. i should have looked a little more
closely at the situation. :)
s.
- Original Message
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 8:34:26 AM
Subject: [computer-go] EGC2007
I organized side event "Predict Professinal Mov
thanks for this. the results are extremely informative --
more so than an hour of L&D problems.
does anyone have a good explanation for the pro move
in figure 15 (game situation 12)? that one's got me stumped.
gnugo's move in this situation, by the way, is laughable.
s.
- Original Message
