Joshua Shriver wrote:
> Perhaps I'm mistaken in my reading, but isn't Mogo a clusterized and
> highly tuned version of gnugo? Things like that made me want to make
> this post. As I find the Go programming community more open to sharing
> ideas and code than my chess world counter part.
You are m
On May 23, 2009, at 3:17 AM, Joshua Shriver wrote:
I know with the Chess community, it's looked down upon to use
others code w/ respect to competing in tournaments. I'm curious,
how is it with Go?
Even more so. A decade ago, a couple of North Korean programs were
alleged to have been pl
MoGo was inspired by Crazy Stone? I've never heard that before.
Ian Osgood wrote:
On May 23, 2009, at 3:17 AM, Joshua Shriver wrote:
I know with the Chess community, it's looked down upon to use others
code w/ respect to competing in tournaments. I'm curious, how is it
with Go?
Even more
On May 23, 2009, at 8:21 AM, Michael Williams wrote:
MoGo was inspired by Crazy Stone? I've never heard that before.
From Sensei's Library:
Warm thanks to Rémi Coulom who participated in Yizao's internship.
MoGo's early development benefited a lot from his sharing the
experience of pr
On 23, May 2009, at 4:03 AM, Gunnar Farnebäck wrote:
Joshua Shriver wrote:
> Perhaps I'm mistaken in my reading, but isn't Mogo a clusterized and
> highly tuned version of gnugo?
You are mistaken.
You may have mixed things up with SlugGo, which at least at some time
could be loosely described
course.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-
> boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Michael Williams
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 8:22 AM
> To: computer-go
> Subject: Re: [computer-go] Go + code + environment
>
>
>
>
> Perhaps I'm mistaken in my reading, but isn't Mogo a clusterized and highly
> tuned version of gnugo? Things like that made me want to make this post. As
> I find the Go programming community more open to sharing ideas and code than
> my chess world counter part.
>
> Will gladly stand correct
I use a Gnugo binary for testing the Monte Carlo engine, but I did not use
Gnugo for testing any older version of Many Faces. I've never looked at
Gnugo's source code. Since I published descriptions of Many Faces'
internals before Gnugo was developed, I suspect that some ideas from Many
Faces are
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:19 -0700, David Fotland wrote:
> I asked about looking at Gnugo source back in 2001, but the answer I
> got from Richard Stallman convinced me it would not be a good idea.
>
Please could you elaborate David? Is the GPL infectious through looking
at source code?
_
o.org] On Behalf Of Tom Cooper
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:37 PM
> To: computer-go
> Subject: RE: [computer-go] Go + code + environment
>
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:19 -0700, David Fotland wrote:
>
> > I asked about looking at Gnugo source back in 2001, but the answer I
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:33 PM, David Fotland wrote:
> GPL is not infectious through looking at source code, but I didn't want any
> appearance of wrongdoing. And I was put off a little by Stallman's
> rhetoric.
>
> David
>
I have mostly stayed away from GPL projects for the same reasons.
Inste
11 matches
Mail list logo
