Extrapolate for a national network.
OK, for a FiOS level network that can be leveraged as technology improves
with a 15-20 year time horizon, probably at least $300B. Based on our best
projections we're going to spend at least $35B in our footprint, which is
basically now the East coast corri
In the early years. All the astronauts were active duty military folks.
NASA and the Military have been closely linked. Not a bad thing.
Now do not get me wrong I do not see anything wrong with NASA being
intimately linked with our military I do not consider military a bad
thing. (I better
So is the innovator the one who came up with 'app phones' or the one who
popularized them?
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:53 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2010, at 7:22 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Both of my co-workers most decidedly use their cell phones more
>> often for texting, playi
Not unless you know something the rest of us don't.
I need to concede that we have satellites that monitor stuff. But Star
Wars? No. And what does NASA and the constitution have to do with each other?
Or did I forget that McDonalds and the constitution thing? Ok, McDonalds is a
I live in sNJ less than 1h by car from central Philly (from 7-9am and 3:30-6pm
make that 2h)...and I have 3g at my home only if I shake the phone a lot!! And
only one cable provider ...no fios ...nothin'
-Original Message-
From: b_s-wilk [mailto:b1sun...@yahoo.es]
Sent: Thursday, Febru
...you mean the name should be "dumbphones" ??
-Original Message-
From: phartz...@gmail.com [mailto:phartz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Cell phone radiated power
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:
> As Bob Park likes to say, Albe
Somebody hasta make the kiddie porn... some schools must have creative
financing...
-Original Message-
From: phartz...@gmail.com [mailto:phartz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:54 PM
Subject: Creepy or what?
Parents: school used webcam to spy on our kid at home
By Jacqu
The tenth doesn't give much leeway. We strayed greatly and long ago.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:31 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:
> We, the people, are the government of the United States.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, that's the way it is **supposed** to be. But it isn't, really. The
>> federal government does all
You mean we don't?
Stewart
At 05:34 PM 2/19/2010, you wrote:
I'm sorry, but you'll have to explain that. NASA and the
constitution? What the hell are you thinking? One had nothing to do
with the other, thank God. If it did we'd have military in space.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.ne
I'm sorry, but you'll have to explain that. NASA and the constitution?
What the hell are you thinking? One had nothing to do with the other, thank
God. If it did we'd have military in space.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/ together with
http://www.cell-mateus.com/aboutcell-mate.html ...let's start an investment
fund!!
-Original Message-
From: John Duncan Yoyo [mailto:johnduncany...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: Cell phone radiated power
There was
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:
> As Bob Park likes to say, Albert Einstein won the Nobel Prize in 1905 for
> showing that cell phones can't cause cancer. It seems to me that cell
> phone-related cancer is what's mostly rejected "out of
> hand".
Mostly that is what was
Here you go .you should all get this thing .it's gonna cook yer brainz !!
http://www.ismashphone.com/2009/01/cellmate-headset-keeps-cell-phone-at-your
-ear-if-it-really-exists-that-is.html
You are guaranteed to be a veritable "yoyo" in as little as a week
(depending on how much brain you st
> It is funny how so many folks who have dismissed, out of hand, any
> suggestion that the radiation from a cell phone has any effect upon
> the brain or other bodily tissues have fully embraced this finding.
As Bob Park likes to say, Albert Einstein won the Nobel Prize in 1905 for
showing that
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:08 PM, John DeCarlo wrote:
> For those who are Google-impaired and will no doubt complain:
>
> http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-01/cell-phone-exposure-reverses-alzheimers-and-boosts-memory-mice
It is funny how so many folks who have dismissed, out of hand
We, the people, are the government of the United States.
Yes, that's the way it is **supposed** to be. But it isn't, really. The
federal government does all sorts of extra-constitutional things, and gets away
with it. Who is doing anything about it?
Fred,
The US Constitution gives a l
For those who are Google-impaired and will no doubt complain:
http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-01/cell-phone-exposure-reverses-alzheimers-and-boosts-memory-mice
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:02 AM, John Duncan Yoyo
wrote:
> There was a lengthy (for Popular Science) article on this this
phartz...@gmail.com escribió:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
That's about it for now.
Good post. I think that the FCC wants industry to get with the
various governmental agencies and really get this issue hashed
out...finally. I see that President Obama just signe
> I don't pay a whole lot of attention, but I don't think I've ever seen a
> laptop/notebook with a
> **built-in** webcam. I think I'd be very suspicious of a school system that
> issued computers with
> them.
No, lots and lots of laptops and netbooks have built-in webcams. There's
nothing at
> If all these things are unconstitutional then someone would have
> litigated it a long time ago and the Supreme Court would have declared so.
>
> So I do not buy it at all.
Right. Every time I hear, "Show me where in the Constitution is says we can
have X", I think, "I'll do that as soon as yo
It is the newest and neatest thing for manufacturers to build them
in. Most often than not nowadays you will find them standard fare on laptops.
We got two netbooks and one laptop in the last year and all of them
had built in webcams.
Stewart
At 11:32 AM 2/19/2010, you wrote:
At 08:53 PM
At 08:53 PM 2/18/2010, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
>Parents: school used webcam to spy on our kid at home
>
>By Jacqui Cheng | Last updated February 18, 2010 12:23 PM
I don't pay a whole lot of attention, but I don't think I've ever seen a
laptop/notebook with a **built-in** webcam. I think I'd b
At 04:54 PM 2/18/2010, tjpa wrote:
>You need to take a class in logic.
You're probably right. I've been a global warming denier since day one.
Which text book to you recommend? Is there an on-line class?
Fred Holmes
*
I hear this all the time, and even the wacky flyer who killed an IRS
agent yesterday spouted much of the same thing.
Many times when someone says this, it is because someone else who has
called themselves an expert has said it.
When push comes to shove, the Supreme Court has always said you g
At 07:31 PM 2/18/2010, b_s-wilk wrote:
>That's what unregulated corporate power does. From your comments, that's what
>you want. You are either an unrepentant corporatist, or very confused.
That's your strawman. It's not what I said.
Fred Holmes
**
At 07:31 PM 2/18/2010, b_s-wilk wrote:
>We, the people, have our representatives appoint regulators to keep
>corporations under control.
Not really, I don't think. The president appoints the top regulators, with the
advice and consent of the senate. But even the top regulators don't have a
wh
At 11:30 PM 2/18/2010, b_s-wilk wrote:
>I've been amazed at the obscure locations outside the US where I get all bars
>on my cell phone, even in Mexico near the Belize border, or on remote Greek
>islands. Similarly, broadband is so fast and pervasive [and cheap] in much of
>Europe, high in the P
At 11:30 PM 2/18/2010, b_s-wilk wrote:
>I wonder why it's not like that here. Oh, right, no national broadband policy
>with conservatives fighting against it at every turn--for no good reason, just
>to be against something.
Just make it a key issue for the voters in the next election, and you wi
At 07:31 PM 2/18/2010, b_s-wilk wrote:
>We, the people, are the government of the United States.
Yes, that's the way it is **supposed** to be. But it isn't, really. The
federal government does all sorts of extra-constitutional things, and gets away
with it. Who is doing anything about it?
F
At 02:01 PM 2/18/2010, tjpa wrote:
>False! Do your homework before you start betting with my money.
Don't understand. I'm not betting and I'm not touching your money.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, a
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:26 PM, John Duncan Yoyo
wrote:
> Boy the prosecution of this could lead to no end of hurt. If the school
> district caused the taking of naked pictures of underage children wouldn't
> they be guilty of child pornography? If these pictures were moved between
> servers o
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
> That's about it for now.
Good post. I think that the FCC wants industry to get with the
various governmental agencies and really get this issue hashed
out...finally. I see that President Obama just signed an Executive
Order, making it a
32 matches
Mail list logo
