>A friend who is in classes to be an electrician said he read multiple
>grounding rods are a good idea. Six was the number he mentioned. My
>handyman thought two was reasonable.
A quick Google search reveals that code is usually 2 rods, at least 6
feet apart.
***
A friend who is in classes to be an electrician said he read multiple
grounding rods are a good idea. Six was the number he mentioned.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >My house wasn't all that well grounded at the time of installation. We
> took
> >a
>My house wasn't all that well grounded at the time of installation. We took
>a spike in June that had me replace my oven, a circuit board in my dryer, a
>doorbell, three outlet strips and two of my two neighbors DVD players. We
>had relied on the incoming water line as the ground for the house.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I didn't have a problem and shooed off my installer after he got the
> outside
> >wiring done because I had a last minute errand that needed running. I got
> >the network hub installed without a hitch by myself.
>
> And b
>I didn't have a problem and shooed off my installer after he got the outside
>wiring done because I had a last minute errand that needed running. I got
>the network hub installed without a hitch by myself.
And because you know enough about proper grounding to go back and check
their work and co
>If we did it wrong we will fix it.
I think the NYNEX branch of the company has always been a problem.
Management so bad that it is even obvious to a distant observer. Not
properly grounding an installation ranks among the most serious of
errors, like a doctor leaving tools inside a patient or
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:24 PM, mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have more bandwith out here on cable then on fiber optic. It's all
> relative. If by FIOS you mean Verizon, their hand has definitely been in
> the cookie jar. They were given wads of tax credits and incentives to
> build
> a
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Eric S. Sande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reference, please.
>>>
>>
> OK, got it. Safety first is what we preach every day and is
> what I expect from my employees.
>
> If we did it wrong we will fix it.
>
> There have been a few about FIOS installation caused fi
Reference, please.
OK, got it. Safety first is what we preach every day and is
what I expect from my employees.
If we did it wrong we will fix it.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy
>>What is the fuss about in NY? I read that FIOS installers are in such a
>>hurry to get to the next job that they are skipping things like bonding
>>the equipment to ground. That doesn't bode well for system reliability.
>
>Reference, please.
Verizon Revisiting FiOS Installs For Grounding Issue
http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=713787&category=BUSINESS
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Eric S. Sande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the fuss about in NY? I read that FIOS installers are in such a
>> hurry to get to the next job that they are skipping things like bondin
What is the fuss about in NY? I read that FIOS installers are in such a
hurry to get to the next job that they are skipping things like bonding
the equipment to ground. That doesn't bode well for system reliability.
Reference, please.
**
It's all relative.
Suppose I just decide not to do it.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
Does verizon use contracted help for some installs? Here you know you are
in trouble when you have a contractor from COX show up...does not bode
well. I had to explain HDTV to the one that came to install a dvr at my
parents house. The official COX installers however are pretty good.
Mike
On S
>I'm not either but I'm not seeing any Comcast employees on this
>list who are willing to engage and explain their corporate visions
>and philosophy.
What is the fuss about in NY? I read that FIOS installers are in such a
hurry to get to the next job that they are skipping things like bonding
th
We have more bandwith out here on cable then on fiber optic. It's all
relative. If by FIOS you mean Verizon, their hand has definitely been in
the cookie jar. They were given wads of tax credits and incentives to build
an infrastructure and in return built very little of it. Yes they may have
m
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:15 PM, mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not how you are equating honesty with what type of broadband is used?
No, the double secret limits on usage for 'unlimited' service. They want to
provide a third world level of coverage to the US users. I guess all we can
s
- Original Message -
From: "Eric S. Sande" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Computer Guys Discussion List"
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Comcastic Broadband!
>I'm not how you are equating honesty with what type of broadband is
I'm not how you are equating honesty with what type of broadband is used?
I'm not either but I'm not seeing any Comcast employees on this
list who are willing to engage and explain their corporate visions
and philosophy.
My position is well known and I think you all know that I'm not
about slam
> Yep they should have kicked Comcast in the cojones with a couple of
> hundred million dollar fine.
In essence, this is what the FCC is doing. This is price controls by proxy.
Comcast is determined to shape the traffic on its network, for whatever the
reason, and the FCC is only too happy to obl
> >Enjoy the fruits of your government in action.
>
> "inaction"
Don't expect any sympathy from me on either account. You voted for the guys
promising you a free pony, so suck it up.
*
** List info, subscription managem
>Enjoy the fruits of your government in action.
"inaction"
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
***
I'm not how you are equating honesty with what type of broadband is used?
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:09 PM, John Duncan Yoyo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
> FWIW now Comcast is forced to be honest about not wanting to support a
> broadband service they just want to be paid for providing one. The
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Jeff Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Responding to the FCC's scolding, Comcasts' new regime will impose a
> > 250GB cap, throttling of high-consumption users, usage-based billing,
> > and increased DMCA enforcement.
>
> This is what happens when you get a com
> Responding to the FCC's scolding, Comcasts' new regime will impose a
> 250GB cap, throttling of high-consumption users, usage-based billing,
> and increased DMCA enforcement.
This is what happens when you get a complete train-wreck like Kevin Martin
and a witless ideologue like Michael Copps in
Comcast could fight these high capacity users like Qwest. No cap need, no
packet shaping, no worrying about people running servers or downloading
pirated material...
Just charge people really high prices for 1mbit down and no more worries.
You'll never reach a bandwith cap with service like this.
Responding to the FCC's scolding, Comcasts' new regime will impose a
250GB cap, throttling of high-consumption users, usage-based billing, and
increased DMCA enforcement.
I really like that last one. I suppose this means turning their
high-volume customers over to the RIAA. What a great way to
27 matches
Mail list logo