[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12920542#action_12920542
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-116:
Indeed - my impression is that we
It's kind of odd to just nuke a bunch of code without any public discussion?
The content is still in svn and or has been distributed...what is the hurry
in ramming through this svn remove? This seems very unusual and not apache
like...
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Ther
t;>>>>> describe AMCF as "Manifold Connectors Framework" at times?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Karl Wright
>>>>>
On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
> Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain
> Connex, if that wins its vote.
>
> This vote also expires end of day on Friday.
>
> Note: "Manifold" is a tradema
arl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Jack Krupansky
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> -1 for me. Standing alone it's an okay name, but trying to actually use it
>>>>> is a pain (and we might as well call it MCF). But I
sh a
>> good choice.
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Jack Krupansky
>> wrote:
>>> Or Nocon or Noman.
>>>
>>> I know people are tired of voting, but I think we should really
>>> re-vote for
>>>
Krupansky
> wrote:
>> Or Nocon or Noman.
>>
>> I know people are tired of voting, but I think we should really re-vote for
>> the revised candidate list with Connex removed.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>>
hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing?
On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
> Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain
> Connex, if that wins its vote.
>
> This vote also
1.ManifoldCF
2.Connex
-Mark
On 9/28/10 4:44 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> My votes:
>
> Connex
> Connie
> Contango
> Contour
> Manicon
> Multicon
> Ralph
> Repositor
>
> (In alpha order, no preference implied.)
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --
> From
On 9/21/10 10:08 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> The exception naming issue is noted, but that's really a separate
> problem. The IOException exception comes from the IO subsystem, and
> it's the base exception of everything from an encoding exception
> through a socket problem through a timeout. ACFExc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12908561#action_12908561
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-98:
---
I agree - I think the best RES
On 9/2/10 8:21 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> You have until 5 PM Friday to tally your final vote.
>
> Bear in mind, however, that changing your vote to achieve a desired outcome
> may well cause others to change their votes to counteract your move. So I
> urge people to change your vote ONLY if you wa
I think its pretty clear that unless the lords of the incubator *force*
us to do otherwise, we should just leave it as Apache Connectors
Framework. The vote is going to end up reflecting that is my bet anyway.
I havn't seen anyone that's actually involved (if you can say anyone
beyond karl is reall
On 8/31/10 7:09 PM, Matt Weber wrote:
> Don't know if this is an open vote... but if it is:
>
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Yukon
> Apache Manifold
>
>
The more input the merrier!
Apache Manifold
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Yukon
- mark
On 8/31/10 6:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> My preferences:
>
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Manifold
> Apache Acromantula
>
> Karl
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> I know this is un-Apache-like,
On 8/30/10 5:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I'm not going to go head-to-head with you trying to split hairs. ;-)
> Can we agree that something like "ContentCF" is a possibility under your
> guidelines? (I'm not proposing that, I'm just trying to open the field up a
> bit.)
>
> Karl
>
>From my end,
l Wright wrote:
> Ok, let's do a count.
>
> Single word: 49
> Multiword: 26
>
> (I'm not including commons or jakarta in this, because they are multiple
> projects)
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> R
> I'm sure nobody will have a cow. Or, at
> least not a very large one. ;-)
>
> Karl
Right, but that's not a very good guiding principle for choosing an
apache project name - nobody will have a cow. And yes, pretty much
everyone I have ever heard talk about Lucene, calls it Lucene rather
than t
They're just mashed together. ;-)
>
> Karl
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> On 8/30/10 1:37 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>> snip - Consider using functional names, especially for products of
>> existing
>>> projects, e.g.
estry
Tika
TCL
Tiles
Tomcat
TrafficServer
Turbine
Tuscany
UIMA
Velocity
Wicket
Web Services
Xalan
Xerces
XML
XMLBeans
XML Graphics
>
> Karl
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> On 8/30/10 1:05 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not
On 8/30/10 1:05 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I'm not too keen on just a simple abstract name - too meaningless for me.
It works for countless Apache projects (that's really the standard) -
not really buying it would be a problem here.
Also, I havn't been following closely, so if someone hasn't point
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12902940#action_12902940
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-56:
---
bq. HTTP methods other than GET or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12902941#action_12902941
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-98:
---
bq. Also, POST should be usable a
+1 to renaming the package - nows the time.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Aug 22, 2010, at 8:01 PM, "Jack Krupansky"
wrote:
> +1
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --
> From: "Karl Wright"
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 1:49 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12886718#action_12886718
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-55:
---
If it's now that easy, then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12886715#action_12886715
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-55:
---
bq. Jack, for example, was extre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12886494#action_12886494
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-55:
---
All the more reason to get LCF wor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879182#action_12879182
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-40:
---
bq. could you summarize what you ar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879107#action_12879107
]
Mark Miller edited comment on CONNECTORS-40 at 6/15/10 7:3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879178#action_12879178
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-40:
---
>From
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879174#action_12879174
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-40:
---
Hey Karl -
To lower the bar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879107#action_12879107
]
Mark Miller commented on CONNECTORS-40:
---
FYI:
http://search.lucidimagination
On 6/14/10 11:22 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I guess nobody took up the task of writing an LCF report for this
months board meeting [1]. I was quite busy last week so I
unfortunately didn't notice this in time. Sorry about that.
The missing report is not too big a deal, but we'll need to submi
On 6/8/10 6:35 AM, karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
I've been trying to get some basic tests working under Junit. Unfortunately,
I've run into a Derby problem which prevents these tests from working.
What happens is this. Derby, when it creates a database, forces a number of directories
within t
Framework
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Mark Miller
Priority: Trivial
{code}
nextString.trim();
{code}
should likely be:
{code}
nextString = nextString.trim();
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to
: Bug
Reporter: Mark Miller
Priority: Minor
{code}
if (x instanceof TimeMarker)
{
ps.setTimestamp(i+1,new java.sql.Timestamp(((Long)x).longValue()));
}
{code}
should likely be:
{code}
if (x instanceof TimeMarker
On 6/8/10 6:35 AM, karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
I've been trying to get some basic tests working under Junit. Unfortunately,
I've run into a Derby problem which prevents these tests from working.
What happens is this. Derby, when it creates a database, forces a number of directories
within t
On 03/05/2010 09:47 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Mar 4, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Folks seem to think this page is a good way to start:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LogoContest
Do we have sponsors for such a thing?
When I referred to that page, I was pointing more
Karl Wright wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've posted some possible logos in the wiki - see
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CONNECTORS/Possible+Logos .
> The person who did these is willing to revise/do more, with proper
> incentive. ;-) Please post your thoughts about appropriateness for
> LCF,
39 matches
Mail list logo
