On 8/30/10 1:05 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > I'm not too keen on just a simple abstract name - too meaningless for me.
It works for countless Apache projects (that's really the standard) - not really buying it would be a problem here. Also, I havn't been following closely, so if someone hasn't pointed it out yet, fyi on some recommendations: http://www.apache.org/dev/project-names.html - Mark
