Hey Tomasz,
+boolean P2P [readwrite]
+
+This option allows to enable or disable the support
+for P2P wireless network also known as WiFi Direct.
+
+When P2P is enabled scanning will scan for P2P peer
+clients as well.
Ok
+
+stri
Am 14.05.2013 16:17, schrieb Tomasz Bursztyka:
Hi Simon,
I am not completely aware of P2P stuff, so some of my comments might be
bogus.
Attached to this mail are three
patches which outline the needed modifications to support group
formation (with GO
negotiation and autonoumous group support).
Hi Simon,
>>> +boolean P2P [readwrite]
>>> +
>>> +This option allows to enable or disable the support
>>> +for P2P wireless network also known as WiFi Direct.
>>> +
>>> +When P2P is enabled scanning will scan for P2P peer
>>> +clients as well
Am 15.05.2013 13:17, schrieb Marcel Holtmann:
Hi Simon,
+boolean P2P [readwrite]
+
+This option allows to enable or disable the support
+for P2P wireless network also known as WiFi Direct.
+
+When P2P is enabled scanning will scan for P2P peer
+
Hi Simon,
> +boolean P2P [readwrite]
> +
> +This option allows to enable or disable the support
> +for P2P wireless network also known as WiFi Direct.
> +
> +When P2P is enabled scanning will scan for P2P peer
> +c
Hi,
On 01/14/2013 02:20 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On 14.01.2013 14:08, Daniel Wagner wrote:
when something blocks:
connmanMonitor::servicesChanged
START: getServices !
getServices duration: 0.00296497344971
START: getServices !
getServices duration: 0.00302910804749
START: getServices !
getServ
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 13:13 -0700, Justin Maggard wrote:
> Clean up several places where dhcp_client->type == G_DHCP_IPV4LL is
> unhandled.
Applied, thanks!
In order not to make a mess out of the shared data structure memebers,
the dhcp and ll handling might need to be separate instances of the s
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 10:27 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> From: Daniel Wagner
>
> The old assumption was that a config file is associtated
> with one session only. With introducing UID/GID support a policy
> might be used for several sessions. Furthermore, it was assumed
> that the
Hi Patrik,
On 05/15/2013 04:57 PM, Patrik Flykt wrote:
+static void recheck_sessions(void)
+{
+ GHashTableIter iter;
+ gpointer value, key;
+ struct policy_group *group = NULL;
+
+ g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, session_hash);
+ while (g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, &