On 20 Jul 2001 23:55:39 -0400, Larry Braden wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Hope this isn't an old hat problem, but I'm getting input/output errors
> when I open a terminal to /mnt/cdrom. This is the case with root and
> users. FSTAB says supermount is set up for iso9660. Any ideas on what I
> need t
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:18:53PM +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
>
[ having some time, I return to this thread ]
> I'm GNOME maintainer for Mandrake and I've never seen your problem.
It has to be environment then. Maybe it's my hardware or setup or
something. I see this problem all the time.
due to my stockwatch and sec ... experience ... i'm aware that there are
ways around (literally) u.s. regulations. Therefore, i kinda figured it
was just corn on the _C.O.B._ (hehe, just had to get that in)(Can Puerto
Ricans click the link? :P)
Hello all,
Hope this isn't an old hat problem, but I'm getting input/output errors
when I open a terminal to /mnt/cdrom. This is the case with root and
users. FSTAB says supermount is set up for iso9660. Any ideas on what I
need to do? The OS was just freshly installed.
thanks sincerely,
Lar
On 20010720 Mordechai Ovits wrote:
>On Friday 20 July 2001 12:39, Blue Lizard wrote:
>> Jose-
>> I would advise valuing any testimony, including this, in your search for
>> ide raid controllers that work under linux. With 3ware's tie to the
>> kernel, and suc
On Friday 20 July 2001 10:39 pm, civileme methodically organized electrons to
state:
>
>
> It is also US Law and Japanese Law. It is considered that ordinary US
> People should not be exposed to risks like an "unregulated" market. Of
> course, those linux developers that RH reserved some share
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:05:57AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > It is canadian law. Not france law. More to the point almost any country
> > have those types of law
>
> Care to elaborate? What Canadian law?
>
> b.
>
>
Most countries have laws which state that you can't soll
On Saturday 21 July 2001 06:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Bah! I forgot to put the URL in my previous attempt to ask this. I
> >
> >
> >
> > > What is with the exlusive nature of this:
> > >
> > > http://www.mandrakesoft.com/company/investors/ipo/
> >
> > Haha! Ok, now that we have some c
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:05:57AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It is canadian law. Not france law. More to the point almost any country
> have those types of law
Care to elaborate? What Canadian law?
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
>
> > Bah! I forgot to put the URL in my previous attempt to ask this. I
>
> > What is with the exlusive nature of this:
> >
> > http://www.mandrakesoft.com/company/investors/ipo/
> >
> Haha! Ok, now that we have some context I can see why you took issue with
> blaming Canada. :-) Never min
This is a weird one. I have never seen anything like this, and I've built
most of the Mandrake packages once or twice on this dual CPU machine (Dell
PowerEdge 1400). Now, when trying to build gnome-python-1.4.1-5mdk, I get the
following:
...etc...
glade_get_widget_tree: filtered out
source='gt
--
Original Message
From: "Vincent Meyer"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Cooker] libraries for RPM
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:07:46 -0500
>Hello,
>
> Silly question - what supplies librpm, libepmdb and librpmio? Can't
>update any of the rpm stuff
> Bah! I forgot to put the URL in my previous attempt to ask this. I
> What is with the exlusive nature of this:
>
> http://www.mandrakesoft.com/company/investors/ipo/
>
Haha! Ok, now that we have some context I can see why you took issue with
blaming Canada. :-) Never mind, after reading th
Hi
VERSION (rsync ftp.sunet.se)
Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20010720 21:21
/ChangeLog/1.523/Thu Jul 19 17:03:46 2001//
Conf. Network the same shit - the following is from report.bug
* starting step `configureNetwork'
* warning: Modification
Hello,
Silly question - what supplies librpm, libepmdb and librpmio? Can't
update any of the rpm stuff without 'em.
Thanks,
V.
Bah! I forgot to put the URL in my previous attempt to ask this. I
was composing a different version of my original message in which I
had posted the URL but decided upon a re-reading of it that it was too
inflammitory and recomposed and forgot the URL. ~smacks forhead~
Anyway, let me try agai
On Fri Jul 20, 2001 at 04:09:45PM -0400, David Walluck wrote:
> > hehehe... I'm flattered to hear so much discussion about my little
> > tool... =) I don't think it needs to be in main either (but that's
> > just me). I don't think it is used by enough people to warrant it
> > being in main. A
When rpmdrake starts it creates the above files and does not remove
them. Is it intentional?
(Well, more accurate would be "files are created when I start rpmdrake".
May be, it does not even know that they are created :-)
-andrej
{pts/1}% sudo urpmi libgal8
installing /mnt/hd/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libgal8-0.9.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...
###
[100%]
file /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gal.mo from install of
libgal8-0.9.
On 20 Jul 2001 21:26:45 +0200
Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcel Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > When building a src.rpm from specfile i get this:
> > Finding Provides: (using /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides)...
> > error: line 114: Dependency tokens must begin
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:11:10AM -0600, Eaon wrote:
> >
> > Huh? I dunno,
>
> If you "dunno", then why are you answering my question?
>
There is no answer to your question. "What is with the exlusive nature of
this?". Is anyone supposed to know the answer to that ambiguous question?
Why not
Vincent Danen wrote:
> hehehe... I'm flattered to hear so much discussion about my little
> tool... =) I don't think it needs to be in main either (but that's
> just me). I don't think it is used by enough people to warrant it
> being in main. And it wasn't written by MandrakeSoft... was writ
This is rpmdrake-1.3-75mdk
1. Packages that are installed due to dependencies are not removed from
the list of updated packages in the rpmdrake. Example - I select
"updated only" in rpmdrake; mark cups and press install. rpminst now
tells me that I have to install libcups - I say O.K. both are in
Thanks Fred
On Friday 20 July 2001 03:14 pm, you wrote:
> Corrected in 7mdk
>
> Salane King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thursday 19 July 2001 06:54 pm, you wrote:
> > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXss
> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > make[3]: *** [kaim] Error 1
--
May the
Marcel Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> When building a src.rpm from specfile i get this:
> Finding Provides: (using /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides)...
> error: line 114: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_'
> or '/':
> error: Failed to find Provides:
> PreReq: rpmlib(Pa
Corrected in 7mdk
Salane King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 19 July 2001 06:54 pm, you wrote:
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXss
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[3]: *** [kaim] Error 1
> >
--
Fred - May the source be with you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hello ,
>
> rpm --rebuild XFree86-4.1.0-6mdk.src.rpm
>
> after 3 hours, it notice me Glide_V3-DRV is older than required
> (Glide_V3-DRI-devel-cvs-2mdk.i586.rpm)
>
> i suggest correct the dep, or make make notice it immediatly
corrected in 7mdk
--
Fred - May the s
So sprach »David Walluck« am 2001-07-20 20.07.2001 um 02:12:12 -0400 :
> Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>
>
> Off-topic, but isn't there an rpm tool that automates uploading to
> contribs and sending out an e-mail? Also, what is the policy about where
rpmproc
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote:
Penguin Liberation Front strikes again !
---
Name: hping2 Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 2.0.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 0.beta54.1mdk Build Date: Fri Jul 20 19:40:57 2001
Install date: (not inst
Vincent Meyer wrote:
> Actually, in the US you ARE allowed to make personal copies of your
> CD's and tapes under rules which were adopted in the (I think - not
> totally sure of the date) early 1980's. This is considered "fair use", as
> is copying for research, academic reasons, etc. Unfortuna
On Friday 20 July 2001 12:39, Blue Lizard wrote:
> Jose-
> I would advise valuing any testimony, including this, in your search for
> ide raid controllers that work under linux. With 3ware's tie to the
> kernel, and such an enthusiastic testimony, you should really consider
> it. I say this main
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 02:52:30PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:
> In the USA it is forbidden to make copies of ones personal Tapes/CDs etc.
> even for personnal use. In Germany you are allowed to do so, as by buying
> the Product (e.g. Video Tape) it gets yous and you may legally make a back
> up
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:11:10AM -0600, Eaon wrote:
>
> Huh? I dunno,
If you "dunno", then why are you answering my question?
> blame Canada.
How do you figure? Or are you just slinging mud?
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
> In the USA it is forbidden to make copies of ones personal Tapes/CDs etc.
> even for personnal use. In Germany you are allowed to do so, as by buying
> the Product (e.g. Video Tape) it gets yous and you may legally
> make a back
> up and use it instead of the origial.
>
I wouldn't count on that
>
> What is with the exlusive nature of this?
>
> b.
>
>
> --
> Brian J. Murrell
>
Huh? I dunno, blame Canada.
Eaon
Actually, in the US you ARE allowed to make personal copies of your
CD's and tapes under rules which were adopted in the (I think - not
totally sure of the date) early 1980's. This is considered "fair use", as
is copying for research, academic reasons, etc. Unfortunately it no
longer applies if
I had really been itching to quote chmouel on that, thanks. Where is he
anyway? I have not seen or heard of him in a while...pink slipped?
management now? :P (of course noone's stupid enough to make him exec)
OT: on the subject of missing developers, when is warly back? I thought
that frenc
Hi!
I just upgraded XEmacs from xemacs-21.4.3-4mdk to xemacs-21.4.3-5mdk. I
also have xemacs-info-4mdk and xemacs-extras-4mdk installed.
So I ran: "urpmi xemacs". This ONLY upgraded the xemacs package, and
NOT the info and extras subpackages. IMHO, this *should* never happen,
but it happens W
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Second one is very common, as there many other things in /etc as just config
> file:
> -service start scripts in /etc/init.d
> -cron task in /etc/cron.*
> -logrotate tak in /etc/logrotate.d
> -a bunch of thing under /etc/X11
> So, must we de
Hi
VERSION (rsync ftp.sunet.se)
Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20010720 15:17
/ChangeLog/1.523/Thu Jul 19 17:03:46 2001//
During installation:
This is from install.log
libopenssl0-0.9.6a-4mdk.i586.rpm Installation CD
libaudiofile0-0.2.2-1mdk.i586.rpm
On Fri Jul 20, 2001 at 09:16:07AM -0400, David Walluck wrote:
> > Well, yes, but rpmproc contains the development cycle of Mandrake cooker only.
>
> Not true, it's at least as useful as rpm-devel or rpm-build, and written
> by mandrakesoft, so you'd think it would get a better showing. Anyway,
Christian Zoffoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...so I think it's more interesting addressing the efforts to a new
> standard compiler rather than waste time in a "virtual" compiler
> composed by 350 patches.
what do you think we're doing ?
we've launched a rpm-rebuilder on a special box to re
On Friday 20 July 2001 10:22 am, you wrote:
> On 20010720 Chris Mumford wrote:
> >> gcc3.0 is in contrib and wasn't ready when mdk8.0 got out of the box
> >
> >(needless
> >
> >> to says that using a new compiler means rebuilding all packages (3-4
>
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
> "Chris Mumford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Why is Mandrake distributing the 2.96 gcc compiler and not 3.0?
>
> gcc3.0 is in contrib and wasn't ready when mdk8.0 got out of the box (needless
> to says that using a new compiler means rebuilding all packages (3-4
Nessus 1.0.9 will be released this weekend
Mostly bugfixes
Any chance of seeing it in the contribs next week?
Regards,
Mads
On Friday 20 July 2001 08:48, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> > I don't understand the laws. If it is legal to decrypt a DVD in Windows,
> > than why is it illegal for Linux users? I don't even own a DVD player,
> > and
>
> Like the GIF issue. When
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Second one is very common, as there many other things in /etc as just config
> file:
> -service start scripts in /etc/init.d
> -cron task in /etc/cron.*
> -logrotate tak in /etc/logrotate.d
> -a bunch of thing under /etc/X11
> So, must we declare all
So sprach »David Odin« am 2001-07-20 20.07.2001 um 16:07:59 +0200 :
> Fixed. (ctags now use alternative).
Well, you also broke it :)
After I installed ctags-5.0.1-1mdk, /usr/binctags (yep, missing /
between bin and ctags) appeared.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (ge
> I'm not worrying. It's just that for LM 8.1, it would be nice to have
> gcc 3.0...
> And to have the c++ compatibilities libs (there was a link to a missing
> library in the 8.0 when it was first distributed. Don't know if it was
> fixed, we're using 7.2 for our work, and I didn't try with the 8
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 09:19:10PM +1000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> egcs is not compatible with gcc 2.95.x. gcc 2.95.x is not compile with
> gcc 2.96. gcc 2.96 is not compatible with gcc 3.0.
>
> End of story. We have distributed egcs and gcc 2.95 before, we had
> incompatibility, why are you worry
On 20010720 Chris Mumford wrote:
>> gcc3.0 is in contrib and wasn't ready when mdk8.0 got out of the box
>(needless
>> to says that using a new compiler means rebuilding all packages (3-4 days
>with
>> rpm-rebuilder) and _testing_)
>
>The only package that I
> gcc3.0 is in contrib and wasn't ready when mdk8.0 got out of the box
(needless
> to says that using a new compiler means rebuilding all packages (3-4 days
with
> rpm-rebuilder) and _testing_)
The only package that I know has problems with 2.96 is LAME. It builds, but
has runtime errors in the r
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:17:15PM +, Xavier Bertou wrote:
> > The reputation of being binary incompatible is mostly based on rumors: it
> > affects only dynamicly linked C++ code; and this same incompatibility
> > exists between egcs-1.1.2 and gcc-2.95, and will exist between gcc-2.95
> > and
Xavier Bertou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The reputation of being binary incompatible is mostly based on rumors: it
> > affects only dynamicly linked C++ code; and this same incompatibility
> > exists between egcs-1.1.2 and gcc-2.95, and will exist between gcc-2.95
> > and gcc-3.0.
>
> What
So sprach »Brian J. Murrell« am 2001-07-19 19.07.2001 um 16:12:05 -0700 :
> What is with the exlusive nature of this?
Hää?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:27:23PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The packages ctags and xemacs-extras conflict in /usr/bin/ctags and
> /usr/share/man/man1/ctags.1.bz2.
>
> What about resolving this issue by using update-alternatives and renaming
> the xemacs ctags to ctags-xemas (and t
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>>I don't understand the laws. If it is legal to decrypt a DVD in Windows,
>>than why is it illegal for Linux users? I don't even own a DVD player, and
>>
>
> Like the GIF issue. When you want to sell sof
> The reputation of being binary incompatible is mostly based on rumors: it
> affects only dynamicly linked C++ code; and this same incompatibility
> exists between egcs-1.1.2 and gcc-2.95, and will exist between gcc-2.95
> and gcc-3.0.
What about gcc-2.96 -> 3.0 ? Did these $^@$%$!$ again change
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As it is ghost, this may be an old version of the file (do you have tested
> > your package or run it as root without the file ?)
> No, i removed everything, checked the absence of score file, then installed
> official package using urpmi.
You ar
Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> Well, yes, but rpmproc contains the development cycle of Mandrake cooker only.
Not true, it's at least as useful as rpm-devel or rpm-build, and written
by mandrakesoft, so you'd think it would get a better showing. Anyway,
doesn't matter to me much unless the person who
"Chris Mumford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why is Mandrake distributing the 2.96 gcc compiler and not 3.0?
Actually gcc 2.96 is the most stable version of gcc currently. It fixes
many more bugs than it creates.
The assertion that it can't compile programs is false, since we did
recompile our
Neulich schrieb Guillaume Cottenceau:
> > I'm not sure I would either, util I could actually play my OWN DVD's
> > that I BOUGHT!
>
> Problem is the law ; it doesn't allow you to decrypt DVD you bought with
OK but you are only speaking for the USA, not for the rest of the world.
Tere are a lot
"Chris Mumford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why is Mandrake distributing the 2.96 gcc compiler and not 3.0?
gcc3.0 is in contrib and wasn't ready when mdk8.0 got out of the box (needless
to says that using a new compiler means rebuilding all packages (3-4 days with
rpm-rebuilder) and _testing_
/* snip */
> >But I don't know what is the usefulness of moving it to main, even if it
> >is a useful tool in the development process, because general users don't
> >need rpmproc. They just want a nice desktop and play Quake :)
>
>
> Well, the idea of main is that one shouldn't have to use anyt
Why is Mandrake distributing the 2.96 gcc compiler
and not 3.0?
David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I don't understand the laws. If it is legal to decrypt a DVD in Windows,
> than why is it illegal for Linux users? I don't even own a DVD player, and
Like the GIF issue. When you want to sell software with DVD decrypting,
you need to pay royalt
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:04:18AM -0230, Juhan Leemet wrote:
> I haven't built any tcltk package for a while. I think the last one might
> have been from a scriptics tarball.
>
> I have tcl and tk (and friends) installed as part of Mandrake 8.0
> distribution. When I try to build the tcltk-8.3
I haven't built any tcltk package for a while. I think the last one might
have been from a scriptics tarball.
I have tcl and tk (and friends) installed as part of Mandrake 8.0
distribution. When I try to build the tcltk-8.3.3-5mdk.src.rpm package, it
fails pointing to line 148 of bldmanhelp sc
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There is a problem tough in icebreaker rpm: icebreaker.score is installed
> > as root.root, altough the %attr directive is games.games in specfile...
> > [...]
> > [root@silbermann guillaume]# ll /var/lib/games/
> > t
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is a problem tough in icebreaker rpm: icebreaker.score is installed as
> root.root, altough the %attr directive is games.games in specfile...
>[...]
> [root@silbermann guillaume]# ll /var/lib/games/
> total 0
> -rw-r--r--1 root root
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
[..]
> This can be seen as a policy for using score file, setgid games on the game
> binary, /var/lib/games can be written by games group and ghost the score
> file.
There is a problem tough in icebreaker rpm: icebreaker.score is installed as
root.root, altough the %
Florin wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent Meyer) writes:
>
>
>>Hey, has anyone ben able to get a netmeeting client to run in cooker? Need
>>this for work. Got the OpenH323 library, and found ohphone.. but ohphone
>>says it needs libpt.so.1, which i haven't been able to find.
>>
>>Wasn't the
Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> But I don't know what is the usefulness of moving it to main, even if it
> is a useful tool in the development process, because general users don't
> need rpmproc. They just want a nice desktop and play Quake :)
Well, the idea of main is that one shouldn't have to use anyt
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ainsi parlait François Pons :
> > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ rpmlint
> > > rpm/RPMS/i586/icebreaker-1.09-1mdk.i586.rpm
E: icebreaker score-file-must-not-be-conffile /var/lib/games/icebreaker.s
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ rpmlint
> > rpm/RPMS/i586/icebreaker-1.09-1mdk.i586.rpm
> > E: icebreaker score-file-must-not-be-conffile
> > /var/lib/games/icebreaker.scores W: icebreaker non-conffile-in-etc
> > /e
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ rpmlint
> rpm/RPMS/i586/icebreaker-1.09-1mdk.i586.rpm
> E: icebreaker score-file-must-not-be-conffile /var/lib/games/icebreaker.scores
> W: icebreaker non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/applnk/Games/icebreaker.desktop
Wh
[guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ rpmlint
rpm/RPMS/i586/icebreaker-1.09-1mdk.i586.rpm
E: icebreaker score-file-must-not-be-conffile /var/lib/games/icebreaker.scores
W: icebreaker non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/applnk/Games/icebreaker.desktop
First one refers to use of %config(noreplace) for a scor
Hi!
With man-1.5i2-1mdk I'm getting the following messages now: (most of them
several times, I removed the duplicates)
gawk: cmd. line:54: warning: escape sequence `\$' treated as plain `$'
find: /var/cache/man/whatis: No such file or directory
/usr/sbin/makewhatis: /var/cache/man/whatis: No suc
Vincent Meyer wrote:
> Hey, has anyone ben able to get a netmeeting client to run in cooker? Need
> this for work. Got the OpenH323 library, and found ohphone.. but ohphone
> says it needs libpt.so.1, which i haven't been able to find.
>
> Wasn't there an announcement recently for a full-featur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent Meyer) writes:
> Hey, has anyone ben able to get a netmeeting client to run in cooker? Need
> this for work. Got the OpenH323 library, and found ohphone.. but ohphone
> says it needs libpt.so.1, which i haven't been able to find.
>
> Wasn't there an announcement rec
michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> couldn't finish install;
> error installing libqt2-2.1.3-6
> then
> an error occurred
> undefined subroutine &c::rpmdbClose called
> then
> an error occurred
> Undefined subroutine &c::rpmReadConfigFiles called
How do you do your sync of DrakX with cooker
81 matches
Mail list logo
