Re: [Cooker] postfix and sasl

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 10:18:26PM -0400, Alan Schmitt wrote: Hi, I upgraded postfix to postfix-2.0.12-2mdk and suddenly I cannot seem to authenticate to my mail server anymore. Here is a detailed log of what happens: Jun 15 21:29:55 alan-schm1p postfix/smtp[6226]: send attr reason = Authentica

Re: [Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:06:05AM +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote: Buchan Milne wrote: Hmmm, hack would be to add manual provides perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) etc in the spec file ... OK, that was my first idea but wondered if there was something cleaner :-) Let's do that. i'd put those in %_requires_

[Cooker] RPM -devel package dependencies [document updated]

Hi, I've updated the rpm -devel package dependency document (http://eijk.homelinux.org/~stefan/rpm_devel_dependencies.html ). Changes: 2003/06/16 v0.7 *

Re: [Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts

Buchan Milne wrote: Hmmm, hack would be to add manual provides perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) etc in the spec file ... OK, that was my first idea but wondered if there was something cleaner :-) Let's do that.

Re: [Cooker] Bootsplash question...

On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:41, scott wrote: > Mandrake also doesn't support MNG animations > on the bootsplash, like SuSE does. And Xandros. It's very pretty. If it can be done easily, let's do it now before the next release cycle gets underway! Cheers; Leon

Re: [Cooker] Real difference between a beta release and a release condidate

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:34, Greg Meyer wrote: > I'd like to get some clarity on what the official differences are > between a beta release and a release candidate. Also, what is the > difference between a freeze and a deep-freeze and how do those terms > relate to beta vs. rc? I interpret the term

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-4.3-15mdk

--- Charles Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 19:36, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Of course we could, but do we want to? The whole > point of this change, > > it seems to me, is to be more elegant, and yanking > out libraries a user > > is relying on and expecting them to r

[Cooker] postfix and sasl

Hi, I upgraded postfix to postfix-2.0.12-2mdk and suddenly I cannot seem to authenticate to my mail server anymore. Here is a detailed log of what happens: Jun 15 21:29:55 alan-schm1p postfix/smtp[6226]: < ssl.polytechnique.org[129.104.30.33] 250-ssl.polytechnique.org Jun 15 21:29:55 alan-sch

Re: [Cooker] Bootsplash question...

On Saturday 14 June 2003 07:56 pm, Greg Meyer wrote: > On Saturday 14 June 2003 04:43 pm, scott chevalley wrote: > > I was just wondering if there are any plans on incorporating some of the > > ideas from www.bootsplash.org into the next version or so of Mandrake? I > > like the idea of having a s

Re: [Cooker] Knoppix-like CD based on Mandrake

> On 16. Jun 2003 at 02:20, Buchan Milne wrote: > >> But ideally all kernel modules *should* go in the kernel package, so >> if cloop isn't yet, maybe we should ask the kernel team. > > there is problem under current mandrake kernel with cloop module :( > latest version > (http://developer.linuxta

Re: [Cooker] Knoppix-like CD based on Mandrake

On 16. Jun 2003 at 02:20, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > On 14. Jun 2003 at 16:05, Buchan Milne wrote: > > cloop only should be only into initrd. user-space tool - you mean > > create_compressed_fs? this is product from cloop compilation. > > But ideally all kernel modules *should* go in the kernel

Re: [Cooker] Knoppix-like CD based on Mandrake

> On 14. Jun 2003 at 16:05, Buchan Milne wrote: > >> Tibor Pittich said: >> > On 14. Jun 2003 at 10:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > >> >> I think a lot of the tools from Knoppix could be used for this, and >> it should not be too difficult. >> > >> > no one tool is needed from knoppix. there is

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-4.3-15mdk

On Sunday 15 June 2003 19:36, Adam Williamson wrote: > Of course we could, but do we want to? The whole point of this change, > it seems to me, is to be more elegant, and yanking out libraries a user > is relying on and expecting them to reinstall them manually does not > strike me as being that.

Re: [Cooker] Real difference between a beta release and a release condidate

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 00:34, Greg Meyer wrote: > I'd like to get some clarity on what the official differences are between a > beta release and a release candidate. Also, what is the difference between a > freeze and a deep-freeze and how do those terms relate to beta vs. rc? A release candidat

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-4.3-15mdk

On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 22:31, Charles Shirley wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 14:42, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 19:11, Olivier Blin wrote: > > > > No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo > > > > and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo d

Re: [Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts

Pascal Terjan > Buchan Milne wrote: >>>I just rebuilt w3m with ipv6 enabled but It has some requires for >>> scripts : >>> >>># rpm -Uvh /tmp/w3m-0.4.1-2mdk.i586.rpm >>>error: Failed dependencies: >>> perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) is needed by w3m-0.4.1-2mdk >>> perl(w3mhelp-funcname.pl) is

[Cooker] Real difference between a beta release and a release condidate

I'd like to get some clarity on what the official differences are between a beta release and a release candidate. Also, what is the difference between a freeze and a deep-freeze and how do those terms relate to beta vs. rc? -- Greg

Re: [Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts

Buchan Milne wrote: [Already sent this 7 hours ago but it still not appear so I guess it's lost] I just rebuilt w3m with ipv6 enabled but It has some requires for scripts : # rpm -Uvh /tmp/w3m-0.4.1-2mdk.i586.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) is needed by w3m-0.

Re: [Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts

> [Already sent this 7 hours ago but it still not appear so I guess it's > lost] > > I just rebuilt w3m with ipv6 enabled but It has some requires for > scripts : > > # rpm -Uvh /tmp/w3m-0.4.1-2mdk.i586.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) is needed by w3m-0.4.

Re: [Cooker] ppp is not ipv6 enabled

On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 23:40, Jason Straight wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 12:12, Dave Cotton wrote: > > I use the Bewan ADSl PCI card and need pppoatm.so, it is also not in ppp > > as standard, it is in the PLF version but that pppd is not persistant, > > so that when the ISP drops the line no a

[Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts

[Already sent this 7 hours ago but it still not appear so I guess it's lost] I just rebuilt w3m with ipv6 enabled but It has some requires for scripts : # rpm -Uvh /tmp/w3m-0.4.1-2mdk.i586.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) is needed by w3m-0.4.1-2mdk per

Re: [Cooker] ppp is not ipv6 enabled

On Sunday 15 June 2003 12:12, Dave Cotton wrote: > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 17:16, Teemu Torma wrote: > > I noticed that ppp is not compiled with ipv6 in 9.1 nor cooker. Just > > enabling it in pppd/Makefile.linux compiles just fine and seems to work > > as well (I am using adsl via nerim.net). > > >

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-4.3-15mdk

On Sunday 15 June 2003 14:42, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 19:11, Olivier Blin wrote: > > > No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo > > > and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo depended on. If you > > > then urpme foo, libbar and libmoo d

[Cooker] [Bug 4070] [acpi] New: ACPI doesn't load on startup

http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4070 Product: acpi Component: acpi Summary: ACPI doesn't load on startup Product: acpi Version: 0.6-6mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-4.3-15mdk

On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 19:11, Olivier Blin wrote: > > No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo > > and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo depended on. If you > > then urpme foo, libbar and libmoo don't get uninstalled. If, however, > > you urpme'd libbar, fo

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-4.3-15mdk

> No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo > and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo depended on. If you > then urpme foo, libbar and libmoo don't get uninstalled. If, however, > you urpme'd libbar, foo *would* be uninstalled. That is, urpme > uninstalls thi

[Cooker] drakedm bug

When running drakedm, and after selecting to restart dm, it bombs with: [EMAIL PROTECTED] meyerv]# drakedm Undefined subroutine &services::restart called at /usr/sbin/drakedm line 67. V.

Re: [Cooker] New installation problems with today's cooker

Hi, Vincent! "Vincent Meyer, MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** (rpmdrake:2196) WARNING ** No builtin or dynamically loaded modules were > found. Pango will not work correctly, This probably means there was an > error in the creation of: > '/etc/pango/pango.modules' > you may be able to re

Re: [Cooker] New installation problems with today's cooker

"Vincent Meyer, MD wrote: > Hi - Found a number of problems with a fresh install of today's cooker > > Mandrake's login screen - no passwords work Known issue, I should have filed a bug report, but did't ... anyway: 1)Laurent isn't currently maintaining it as its future is undecided 2)kdm works fi

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-1mdk

Luca Berra wrote: >> Until ldap uses sasl 2 it's useless to compile postfix with sasl 2. > I beg to differ: > Until ldap uses sasl 2 it's useless to compile postfix with ldap: ldap > should be fixed, not postfix crippled. > No one said we should wait another 2 years to compile everything against

Re: [Cooker] ppp is not ipv6 enabled

On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 18:28, Teemu Torma wrote: > ?? As far as I know, pppoatm.so is in 9.1 ppp. According to changelog, > added in Februrary this year. Sorry, you're right. I'm using 9.0/9.1/Cooker and fighting 40°C in here at the moment. It's 9.0 that has the problem with ppp, and I was havi

[Cooker] New installation problems with today's cooker

Hi - Found a number of problems with a fresh install of today's cooker Mandrake's login screen - no passwords work Mandrake's default desktop theme - no text displays on any buttons or dialogs. Mandrake Firsttime all screens and buttons are blank Log out, log in as root, stop service dm, log in

Re: [Cooker] ppp is not ipv6 enabled

On Sunday 15 June 2003 18:12, Dave Cotton wrote: > I use the Bewan ADSl PCI card and need pppoatm.so, it is also not in > ppp as standard, it is in the PLF version but that pppd is not > persistant, so that when the ISP drops the line no attempt is made to > reconnect. Is there a reason I don't kno

[Cooker] rdvd.conf does not work

/etc/devfs/conf.d/rdvd.conf calls /etc/dynamic/scripts/rawdevice.script to setup raw device and link rdvd -> raw/rawN. This does not work if module "raw" is not yet loaded because it runs as devfsd action and module autoloading is supressed in this case. To setup raw device /dev/raw/* enrties m

Re: [Cooker] ppp is not ipv6 enabled

On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 17:16, Teemu Torma wrote: > I noticed that ppp is not compiled with ipv6 in 9.1 nor cooker. Just > enabling it in pppd/Makefile.linux compiles just fine and seems to work > as well (I am using adsl via nerim.net). > > Any particular reason not to enable it by default? I u

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-1mdk

Luca Olivetti wrote: > En/na Luca Berra ha escrit: ... > both sasl 2 ... > and sasl 1 (pulled in by ldap). > > No wonder it segfaults. well' actually i fixed smtp auth not working (sorry i was an idiot the problem was right in front of me), but that leaves a non-working ldap. > Until ldap uses sa

Re: [Cooker] ppp is not ipv6 enabled

Teemu Torma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I noticed that ppp is not compiled with ipv6 in 9.1 nor cooker. Just > enabling it in pppd/Makefile.linux compiles just fine and seems to work > as well (I am using adsl via nerim.net). > > Any particular reason not to enable it by default? a srpm with t

[Cooker] ppp is not ipv6 enabled

I noticed that ppp is not compiled with ipv6 in 9.1 nor cooker. Just enabling it in pppd/Makefile.linux compiles just fine and seems to work as well (I am using adsl via nerim.net). Any particular reason not to enable it by default? Teemu

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gdm-2.4.2.95-1mdk

Le Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:43:41 +0200, Michael Reinsch a écrit : > Hi! > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 19:15:23 +0200 (CEST) > Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * Fri Jun 13 2003 Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - >> 2.4.2.95-1mdk > > The new gdm.conf looks strange, it contains @X_SERVER_

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gdm-2.4.2.95-1mdk

Hi! On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 19:15:23 +0200 (CEST) Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Fri Jun 13 2003 Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > 2.4.2.95-1mdk The new gdm.conf looks strange, it contains @X_SERVER_PATH@ for some keywords: DefaultPath, RootPath and Xnest -- Michael Reinsch

[Cooker] Re: tetex and addtiona packages

Torstein Dybdahl wrote: Hi! I was wondering if it was a good idea to make rpms of the different styles and fonst. etc the latex packages from CTAN. My idea was to make a sort of tetex-contrib package with different styles, fonts etc taken from the CTAN misc and contrib archive. Many of the pa

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2618] [kernel] Installer hangs during boot

have you tried to boot with mem=nopentium Thomas

[Cooker] [Bug 4065] [evolution] Needs to require some newer version of Orbit

http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4065 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Cooker] [Bug 2618] [kernel] Installer hangs during boot

http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2618 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-06 09:38 --- I have the Same problem. I have disabled USB in the BIOS, tried a network, hd, and cd install. Nothing works. 8.2 works fine. I have found that this problem seems to