[Cooker] Re: [CrashTesters] Back to work ?

http://members.geocities.com/dascore.rm/ndiscreet/images/signature2.jpg";> Altoine Barker Maximum Time Unlimited On 24 Dec 2002, Poogle wrote: > If any of you don't know, Civileme has > announced his return to the lists on newbie & > expert, perhaps

RE: [Cooker] Network Install Failure

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Thomas Backlund Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Network Install Failure Viestissä Sunnuntai 22. Joulukuuta 2002 16:46, Jason Straight kirjoitti: > Yeah,

RE: [Cooker] Network Install Failure

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Straight Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 8:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Network Install Failure Yeah, same here - not that it matters because I don't think it would run with th

[Cooker] Network Install Failure

Title: Message I receive the following error from a GUI install of the latest cooker today:   An error occurred error ordering package list (no error)   I hit "OK"   I notice that the total file size has increased a few megs.   I hit "Install"   New error message:   An error occured err

Re: [Cooker] Menudrake Broken

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 18 December 2002 11:09 am, Frederic Crozat wrote: > On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:57:09 +0000, nDiScReEt wrote: > > This message is in MIME format. > > Can't read your message... Sorry, somewhere it lost my original messag

[Cooker] Menudrake Broken

This message is in MIME format.

Re: [Cooker] [openoffice] GUI fonts invisibles

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 12 December 2002 9:43 am, Austin Acton wrote: > Change your UI font to Lucida. It works. > Austin > > On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 04:49, Lea Gris wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > OpenOffice GUI fonts are invis

Re: [Cooker] pornview: in contrib or plf?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 30 November 2002 8:44 pm, Michael Scherer wrote: > > It looks like a useful program. If we can have a package called BitchX, I > > don't know why we can't have pornview. Just my $ .02. > > I think because of this picture : > > http://cvs.so

Re: [Cooker] pornview: in contrib or plf?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 30 November 2002 5:23 pm, Mike Graham wrote: > On Saturday 30 November 2002 06:00 pm, Adam Williamson wrote: > The RPM for pornview is already on Texstars website Pclinuxonline.com > > > On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 22:55, Stefan van der Eijk wrot

Re: [Cooker] drakconf update (this morning)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 30 November 2002 7:21 am, Lea Gris wrote: > Austin Acton wrote: > > Can't open drakconf anymore: > > [austin@groundstate austin]$ drakconf > > [austin@groundstate austin]$ Can't call method "get_widget" on an > > undefined value at /usr/sbi

Re: [Cooker] URPMI Weirdness

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 30 November 2002 3:34 am, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: > On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 06:09, Olivier Thauvin wrote: > > This is a know problem with your version, supposed to be fixed in -4mdk. > > I have same problem, but: > > > > [olivier@andromede

Re: [Cooker] URPMI Weirdness

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 29 November 2002 10:01 pm, s wrote: > On Friday 29 November 2002 09:50 pm, nDiScReEt wrote: > > /usr/sbin/urpmi --auto-select > > > > To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be > > install

[Cooker] URPMI Weirdness

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 /usr/sbin/urpmi --auto-select To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (54 MB): Guppi-0.40.3-3mdk.i586 eel-2.1.3-1mdk.i586 gedit-2.1.3-1mdk.i586 gnome-icon-theme-0.1.3-2mdk.noarch gnome-panel-2.1.3-1mdk.i586 gnome-ses

Re: [Cooker] how can i rebuild my rpm db?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 29 November 2002 8:33 pm, francesco.melo wrote: > after urpmi 4.0.2 and 3 and 4 and 5 i have almost 15 rpm in my > upgradable rpm that urpmi and rpmdrake tell me are already installed > and it is not true > how can i fix this problem? > > t

Re: [Cooker] Mozilla 1.2 ignores mouse wheel settings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 29 November 2002 1:25 pm, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 13:08, Charles A Edwards wrote: > > On 29 Nov 2002 12:41:03 -0600 > > > > Lonnie Borntreger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, should imwheel be running, or not? > >

[Cooker] URPMI is Beautiful

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I love that the download status now stays on one line instead of scrolling down showing each and every line status. - -- - Altoine B Maximum Time Unlimited Chicago Based and Op

[Cooker] Xmms Works Again

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thank you for finally fixing xmms. It works once again after I think a month and a half of being broken. - -- - Altoine B Maximum Time Unlimited Chicago Based and Operated http:

[Cooker] MCC Broken

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I get this when I run mcc: /usr/sbin/mcc Can't call method "get_widget" on an undefined value at /usr/sbin/drakconf.real line 825. I'm using: drakconf-9.1-0.3mdk - -- - Altoi

[Cooker] Rsync Issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] receiving file list ... readlink Mandrake/RPMS2/RPMS: Too many levels of symbolic links done IO error encountered - skipping file deletion Mandrake/RPMS/ Is there a way to fix this because with it the way that it currently is, my

Re: [Cooker] Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It is like I have a brand new computer! I didn't realize just how bad the old fonts were until after I installed this package! I went the urpmi route and I love it! You are the man, Ben! Thank you for your work on putting together this package. I kn

Re: [Cooker] Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I second that and I'm going to try and test it now! I will post my findings. On Wednesday 27 November 2002 12:47 am, Rocco Stanzione wrote: > On Tuesday 26 November 2002 12:33 pm, Ben Reser spake thusly: > > Ben, very well and creatively done. I don'

Re: [Cooker] Mirroring Change, Heads up...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 25 November 2002 4:09 pm, Oden Eriksson wrote: > måndagen den 25 november 2002 22.35 skrev Ben Reser: > > FYI to all you people who mirror cooker's contribs. > > Someone moved contribs. It used to be in contrib/RPMS and i586 > > symlinked to

Re: [Cooker] KMail is Broken

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 03 November 2002 11:55 pm, nDiScReEt wrote: > I upgraded the latest cooker and I now can no longer use kmail. I get > the error popup: > > The process for the pop3://mail.speakeasy.net protocol died > unexpectedly. I tested to

[Cooker] KMail is Broken

I upgraded the latest cooker and I now can no longer use kmail. I get the error popup: The process for the pop3://mail.speakeasy.net protocol died unexpectedly. I tested to see if the pop server on speakeasy might be the problem but it works as I am able to receive mail and send this message t

Re: [Cooker] new blackbox 0.65.0beta4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 01 August 2002 2:55 am, Murray J. Root wrote: > Select "sloppy" focus model then move the mouse over the window you want. > The new win won't get focus till you click. and what you have highlighted > will get pasted correctly to where the

Re: [Cooker] new blackbox 0.65.0beta4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 01 August 2002 12:50 am, David Walser wrote: > I thought blackbox had been superceded by fluxbox o_O > > --- Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please upgrade :) > > > > http://blackboxwm.sourceforge.net/ > > > > Sebastian

Re: [Cooker] NVdriver no Work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 29 July 2002 1:35 pm, David Bolin wrote: > I assumed that it was KDE3, because it uses a flashing icon of the > application that was just clicked on to indicate busy, I tried the test > you asked for and there is no extra icon. while runnin

Re: [Cooker] NVdriver no Work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 27 July 2002 5:51 pm, David Bolin wrote: > KDE > > > What window manager are you using? KDE, Gnome, blackbox (K), fluxbox, > > WindowMaker, etc? > > Can you work from Console and do a quick test? Type this command on the command line and l

Re: [Cooker] NVdriver no Work

On Friday 26 July 2002 10:06 pm, Quel Qun wrote: > hmmm, > IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=1 rpm --rebuild NVIDIA_blah-srpm > That should also work. > =o= > kk1 Interesting! I will have to try that sometimes. ..then again ...I'm a purist, I like to keep everything matched in the kernel. Still, I will try. -

Re: [Cooker] NVdriver no Work

On Friday 26 July 2002 9:57 pm, David Bolin wrote: > To test out the Driver =) compiled on my laptop for my desktop I > installed Quake III and ran it up at 1024*768 with the texture details > running full. Not one single slowdown or jerk during even the most > intense action. One side note thou

Re: [Cooker] NVdriver no Work

On Friday 26 July 2002 9:49 pm, David Bolin wrote: > I got around it by compiling on a machine installed with the beta1 CD's and > not updated yet. =) LoL, good one! :-D -- Altoine B Maximum Time Unlimited Chicago Based

Re: [Cooker] Fwd: [expert] "noauto" Filesytems being mounted at boot

On Friday 26 July 2002 8:56 pm, Chuck Shirley wrote: > On Friday 26 July 2002 20:52, nDiScReEt wrote: > >On Friday 26 July 2002 7:24 pm, Chuck Shirley wrote: > >> This has been bothering me for some time now, but I thought it was > >> something I misconfigued on my

Re: [Cooker] NVdriver no Work

On Friday 26 July 2002 9:30 pm, David Bolin wrote: > > > > So, I am correct that is is due to your system having and using gcc3.2 > > while your kernel was compiled with gcc3.2, right? > > You appear to be compiling the NVdriver kernel module with > a compiler different from the one that was used

Re: [Cooker] NVdriver no Work

On Friday 26 July 2002 8:35 pm, David Bolin wrote: > I finally got a successful FTP install today (problems before caused by > the bootspash package I believe.) Anyway. ON a current cooker install > I received an error today while trying to rebuild the NVIDIA kernel > package. It complained tha

Re: [Cooker] Fwd: [expert] "noauto" Filesytems being mounted at boot

On Friday 26 July 2002 7:24 pm, Chuck Shirley wrote: > Hi list, > > I sent this to EXPERT list the other day, but no one was biting! > System in question is all cooker! > > Thanks, > > -Chuck > > -- Forwarded Message -- > > Subject: [expert] "noauto" Filesytems being mounted at b

[Cooker] urpmi Broken

su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi.update -a --wget" Password: Global symbol "@unresolved" requires explicit package name at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux/URPM/Build.pm line 84. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm line 765. rpm -qa | grep urpmi gurpmi-3

Re: [Cooker] urpmi missing Perlmodul

> The latest urpmi 3.9 does not solve this Problem. > I cant find the rpm that hold Locale/GetText.pm, can some please give me a > hint? > > thank you > Rene What is the list of your perl packages? rpm -qa | grep perl Make sure all those are current. -- -

Re: [Cooker] Shrinking Text

On Wednesday 24 July 2002 12:43 am, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > Odd thing just happened to me. I just updated several packages, and > suddenly my fonts in gnome applications shrunk. It doesn't seem to have > affected gtkhtml (the evolution editor and viewer), just all the menus, > frame text, et

Re: [Cooker] Control Center icon on kde desktop broken.

On Monday 22 July 2002 10:21 pm, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote: > Hello, > > It tried to launch /usr/X11R6/bin/DrakConf. I can run drakconf (all lower > case) without problem from a console window. > > Vinny It is now located under /usr/bin. --

[Cooker] libvorbisfile.so.0

Installation failed: libvorbisfile is needed by zinf-2.2.0-2mdk libvorbisfile.so.0 is needed by gltron-0.59-14mdk libvorbisfile.so.0 is needed by kdemultimedia-3.0.2-1mdk libvorbisfile.so.0 is needed by tuxracer-0.61-6mdk Try installation without checking dependenci

[Cooker] libvorbisfile.so.0

I can't wait until this problem gets resolved as it is keeping me from upgrading any other packages with "urpmi --auto-select --auto". 16:15:56 (138.96 KB/s) - `/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/glibc-devel-2.2.5-14mdk.i586.rpm' saved [1691002] FINISHED --16:15:56-- Downloaded: 7,255,273 bytes in 6 files

Re: [Cooker] libvorbis0-1.0-1mdk.i586.rpm

On Monday 22 July 2002 4:24 am, François Pons wrote: > nDiScReEt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N) > > > > I choose no as choosing yes usually breaks the program for me. >

[Cooker] kdebase typo

Preparing...### [100%] package kdebase-3.0.2-16mdk (which is newer than kdebase-3.0.2-11mdk) is already installed package kdebase-devel-3.0.2-16mdk (which is newer than kdebase-devel-3.0.2-11mdk) is already installed package kdebase-nsplugi

[Cooker] libvorbis0-1.0-1mdk.i586.rpm

I do the following: urpmi --auto-select I get the following output: To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (12 MB): avifile-player-0.7.12-0.20020719.1mdk.i586 avifile-samples-0.7.12-0.20020719.1mdk.i586 drakxtools

Re: [Cooker] Apache 2.0.40 is soon to be released (?)

Oden Eriksson wrote: > Hi. > > I was thinking to stop my CVS packaging of apache2 and finally go for an > official release. v2.0.40 seems to be around the corner (check the link > below), and I now wonder if you people have some suggestions for improvements > or what ever. There haven't been m

Re: [Cooker] Re: urpmi --proxy crashes

pascal wrote: > Le Mardi 16 Juillet 2002 11:52, François Pons a écrit : > >>pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>urpmi --proxy does not like my proxy syntax... >>> >>># urpmi -v --proxy 'http://127.0.0.1:3128/' ldconfig >>>Died at /usr/sbin/urpmi line 115. >> >>Remove trailing / for instance,

Re: [Cooker] URPMI Broken

This is all using the latest urpmi and gurpmi: rpm -qa|grep urpmi gurpmi-3.7-5mdk urpmi-3.7-5mdk On 16 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Error #1 During an "--auto-select" option > > su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi --auto-select" unable > to uncompress synthesis file at > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_

Re: [Cooker] Video-DVDRip Failed

On 16 Jul 2002, Buchan Milne wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > Han wrote: > | nDiScReEt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > | > |>Installation failed: requires@perl-base >= > |>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~ ^^^ > > |>Try installati

[Cooker] URPMI Broken

Error #1 During an "--auto-select" option su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi --auto-select" unable to uncompress synthesis file at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm line 545. >>> Error #2 Due to no connection to remote server> su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi.up

[Cooker] Video-DVDRip Failed

su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi -v Video-DVDRip" examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.Installation CD (ftp1).cz] examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.Contrib CD (ftp2).cz] examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.plf.cz] retrieving rpms files...

[Cooker] perl-Event Failed

su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi -v perl-Event" examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.Installation CD (ftp1).cz] examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.Contrib CD (ftp2).cz] examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.plf.cz] installing /var/cache/urpmi

Re: [Cooker] Urpmi Broken

On Monday 15 July 2002 3:23 am, Ben Reser wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:08:27AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > > Yes if you'd looked at the archives. And it's fixed in urpmi-3.7-3mdk > > which came out on Friday. > > errr that should be 4mdk. That fixed my problem but now I don't get that nice

Re: [Cooker] Re: OpenOffice.org in cooker not saving preferences

On Monday 15 July 2002 9:55 am, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > How come? Some people already reported that. Whenever I tried, I could not > notice that prefs were not saved. :-( This is from a Cooker Cooker > installation. > > > Maybe this is resolved in OpenOffice.org 1.0.1 ? > > Probably. I will up

Re: [Cooker] Can't install contrib packages in installer?

On Monday 15 July 2002 6:36 am, David Walser wrote: > --- Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Since the NFS installation doesn't work, > > > > it does work! (99% of my tests are nfs installs) > > Well I reported that it *doesn't* work a few days ago,

[Cooker] Urpmi Broken

command (su -c "/usr/sbin/urpmi.update -a"): Can't use string ("") as a subroutine ref while "strict refs" in use at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm line 934. [ndiscreet@localhost ndiscreet]$

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] filesystem-2.1.3-5mdk

On Wednesday 03 July 2002 7:15 pm, David Walser wrote: > Hopefully RPM5 moves away from cpio, it's so flaky. > > Try removing /mnt/cdrom and installing the package, > I've had to do something like this before. > > --- Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:45:27 +0

Re: [Cooker] nvidia driver + cooker

On Sunday 09 June 2002 5:10 am, daniel beck wrote: >... > *** Failed cc sanity check. Bailing out! *** > make: *** [gcc-check] Fehler 1" > > I use gcc3.1.1-0.2, and I thought the kernel was > compiled with gcc3. Can someone perhaps package an rpm > file for nvidia(plf perhabs?) You have to check

Re: [Cooker] Install issues

On Wednesday 05 June 2002 2:02 am, Randy Welch wrote: > Murray J. Root wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Jun 2002 01:00:05 -0700 Randy Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I tried an install from the latest cooker on one of my test > >>systems and had an issue with journaled file systems. > >> > >>1. Could n

[Cooker] KwinTV Broken

KwinTv is broken if you install only kde3. -- Altoine B Maximum Time Unlimited Chicago Based and Operated One thing about the past. It's likely to last

Re: [Cooker] Say when it's safe again . .

On Wednesday 29 May 2002 1:33 pm, Robert Fox wrote: > Cooker is changing so rapidly, it's hard to tell when it's safe to try > an install. You guys work awfully FAST! > > I think this is great - but as previously suggested - there should be a > method to let people know when it is SAFE to try and

Re: [Cooker] Mozilla Java Plugin Still Broken

On Tuesday 28 May 2002 4:56 pm, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > Hi, > > > I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and still > > java > > is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next. > > Huh, where did you find rc2.4mdk? Latest is rc2.2mdk and rc2.3mdk will > probab

Re: [Cooker] kicker hangs

On Wednesday 29 May 2002 2:41 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach Brad Felmey am 2002-05-28 um 15:51:36 -0500 : > > dual-head without xinerama is a pain, so I simply rolled back to 4.1 so > > Hmm, not so simple... Do you know where I still might download XFree86 > 4.1? Or could you be so kind

Re: [Cooker] kicker hangs

On Wednesday 29 May 2002 2:41 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach Brad Felmey am 2002-05-28 um 15:51:36 -0500 : > > dual-head without xinerama is a pain, so I simply rolled back to 4.1 so > > Hmm, not so simple... Do you know where I still might download XFree86 > 4.1? Or could you be so kind

Re: [Cooker] Mozilla Java Plugin Still Broken

On Wednesday 29 May 2002 2:47 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 28 May 2002, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > * Rejected requested for enhancement: > > > > Not that I want to claim to know anything about JAVA, but maybe we can

Re: [Cooker] when installing the latest pwlib i have problems with the gnomemeeting rpm

> The problem is not pwlib->pwlib1. It is pwlib1-1.2.17->pwlib1-1.2.19 > > -> lf pwlib* > pwlib1-1.2.19-1mdk.i586.rpm pwlib1-devel-1.2.19-1mdk.i586.rpm > -> rpm -qa | grep pwlib > pwlib1-1.2.17-1mdk > pwlib1-devel-1.2.17-1mdk > -> rpm -Uvh pwlib* > error: failed dependencies: > pwlib1 =

Re: One more PLF package? RE: [Cooker] Mozilla Java Plugin Still Broken

On Wednesday 29 May 2002 12:08 am, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > > I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and > > still > > > > java > > > is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next. > > > > Huh, where did you find rc2.4mdk? Latest is rc2.2mdk and rc2.3mdk will

Re: [Cooker] when installing the latest pwlib i have problems with the gnomemeeting rpm

On Tuesday 28 May 2002 11:50 pm, Luis Alves wrote: > It it possible to compile gnomemeeting to use this new version. > > Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > >>this is what i get > >> > >>[root@finalpoint cooker]# rpm -Uvh pwlib1-1.2.19-1mdk.i586.rpm > >>error: failed dependencies: > >>pwlib1 = 1.2.1

Re: [Cooker] Mozilla Java Plugin Still Broken

On Tuesday 28 May 2002 6:35 pm, Ryan T. Sammartino wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:12:17PM -0500, nDiScReEt wrote: > > My signature is a program that uses fortune. That last signature is a > > by-product of that script in action. My apologies. > > My sig is also genera

Re: [Cooker] Mozilla Java Plugin Still Broken

On Tuesday 28 May 2002 4:42 pm, Ben Reser wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:13:57PM -0500, nDiScReEt wrote: > > I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and still > > java is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next. > > With a signatur

[Cooker] Mozilla Java Plugin Still Broken

I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and still java is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next. -- Altoine B Maximum Time Unlimited Chicago Based and Operated ---

[Cooker] typist error message on urpmi

I got this message when I ran urpmi for the typist package: typist ## install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/typist.info.bz2 error: execution of %post scriptlet from typist-2.4-1mdk failed, exit status 1 I

Re: [Cooker] Re: ooffice - OpenOffice.org-1.0-4mdk.i586.rpm

On Sunday 26 May 2002 12:30 pm, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 08:08:49PM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > java? > > > > rm -rf .openoffice > > For safety, do: > > $ rm -rf ~/.openoffice > > > PATH=/path/to/java/runtime/bin:$PATH ooffice > > > > now it should hopefully work ..

Re: [Cooker] Apache 2

On Monday 20 May 2002 1:17 pm, J.P. Pasnak wrote: > On May 20, 2002 03:15 am, Oden Eriksson wrote: > > On Mondayen den 20 May 2002 10.30, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > > > What's the target for making Apache 2 the "default" server instead > > > of Apache 1? > > > > I think it's like this: > > > > 1.

[Cooker] Software Manager Broken

Freshly installed the latest cooker by ftp. Software Manager doesn't work. With software manager not working, I can not setup my Update source list. This is what I have installed for gcc: libgcc3.1-3.1-0.11mdk gcc-cpp-3.1-0.11mdk gcc-3.1-0.11mdk gcc3.1-c++-3.1-0.8mdk gcc-c++-3.1-0.11mdk gcc-java-

[Cooker] MCC Broken

I freshley installed cooker from ftp and find mcc broken. I type in the command mcc as root and there is nothing. Not even an error argument. I do strace -c mcc and I get the following output: [ndiscreet@localhost ndiscreet]$ su -c "strace -c mcc" Password: execve("/usr/X11R6/

Re: [Cooker] glibc upgrade causes disk read failures

On Monday 13 May 2002 00:52, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > I tried to upgrade from glibc 2.2.4 to 2.2.5. Upon rebooting I got a > whole bunch of dma read failures on my disk (ext3) right after I got the > message that it was starting init. Obviously this made so that none of > the filesystems got mo

Re: [Cooker] Java Experiences

> > GLIBC 2.2 / Linux 2.4 users should also define an environment variable: > > export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 > > That export can cause problems when you are using sun JDK 1.4 under > Cooker. > > I got errors with dirname and ls when using libc 6. > > This appeared with Jago (a Java Go client for

Re: [Cooker] Java Experiences

> > GLIBC 2.2 / Linux 2.4 users should also define an environment variable: > export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 > > > I might try that when I reimplement java 1.4. It may be stable with tomcat, > but it sure isn't stable with yahoo! chat or yahoo! games.I want to kill my > current setup (PHP) and swit

Re: [Cooker] Java Experiences

Another note straight from jakarta-tomcat project release notes: --- Linux and Sun JDK 1.2.x - 1.3.x: --- Virtual machine crashes can be experienced when using certain combinations of kernel / glibc under Linux with Sun Hotspot 1.2 to 1.3.

Re: [Cooker] Java Experiences

> Well we only fired it up yesterday, but we set up a box with Tomcat and > j2sdk 1.4.0 using NFuse as a front end for a citrix box, soon to be a > citrix cluster. We haven't put it under load yet, but it's being > tested right now. I'll keep your comment about 1.3.1 being more stable > on the

Re: [Cooker] Lime Wire Installation Solution

On Friday 10 May 2002 07:34 pm, you wrote: > nDiScReEt wrote on Thu, May 09, 2002 at 04:56:04AM -0500 : > > I put where I downloaded my j2sdk1.3.1-02b-FCS: > > Sun just released 1.4.0 of j2sdk. Have you tried anything with 1.4.0 > yet? Better? Worse? Same? We did somethi

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kernel-2.4.18.14mdk-1-1mdk

On Tuesday 07 May 2002 01:31 am, you wrote: > oops, forgot to mention. I tried compiling with both gcc 3.0.4(-2mdk) and > gcc2.96(-0.76mdk). -- Dave > > On Tuesday 07 May 2002 01:23 am, you wrote: > > I'm having two problems with the latest kernel. I've never tried > > compiling the kernel fro

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kernel-2.4.18.14mdk-1-1mdk

On Tuesday 07 May 2002 01:23 am, you wrote: > I'm having two problems with the latest kernel. I've never tried compiling > the kernel from the Mandrake source but I read through the documentation in > the Mandrake reference manual and there weren't any surprises there. > However, when I tried to

Re: [Cooker] Re: Rebuilding Xine on 8.2

On Sunday 05 May 2002 10:23 am, you wrote: > On Sun, 5 May 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > > I'm trying to rebuild the Cooker Xine 0.9.9 SRPMs on 8.2 with the > > > command 'rpm --rebuild --target athlon xine-lib-0.9.9-1mdk.src.rpm'. > > > > This is not an 8.2 support list. Please go to Mandrak

Re: [Cooker] Re: Rebuilding Xine on 8.2

On Sunday 05 May 2002 09:48 am, you wrote: > On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to rebuild the Cooker Xine 0.9.9 SRPMs on 8.2 with the command > > 'rpm --rebuild --target athlon xine-lib-0.9.9-1mdk.src.rpm'. > > This is not an 8.2 suppo

Re: [Cooker] Partitioning Advice

civileme wrote: > nDiScReEt wrote: > >> I'm currently in the process of setting up my cooker partition. When I >> do this with another linux installed, just don't mount the other linux

Re: [Cooker] Partitioning Advice

Borsenkow Andrej wrote: >>Am I on the right track. >> > > > You are in the wrong list, sorry. > > -andrej > > > > My apologies. I thought this would be the perfect list for partitioning a cooker installation with another distribution already installed. -- Altoine B Maximum Time Unlimite

[Cooker] Partitioning Advice

Example: __ | | | | | | | | | | |1|2|3| 4|5 |6|7 |8| 9 | | | | | | | | | | | ---

[Cooker] Partitioning Advice

I'm currently in the process of setting up my cooker partition. When I do this with another linux installed, just don't mount the other linux partition? Example: ___ | | | | | | | | | |1|2|3| 4|5 |6|7 |8

Re: [Cooker] libraw1394 Rebuild Problems

On Tuesday 30 April 2002 12:59 am, you wrote: > > > BTW: why are you rebuilding? binaries should be available .. > > > > > > > > > -- Geoff. > > > > My spec doesn't have an entry for %configure. That probably would explain > > why I couldn't recompile. I will add it and see if that would make it

Re: [Cooker] libraw1394 Rebuild Problems

On Monday 29 April 2002 06:33 pm, you wrote: > > > > -- Geoff. > > > > > > Where would I put that, Geoff? I have to go into the > > > /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/libraw1394-0.9.0 directory and mess around in there? > > > I can recompile kernel src rpms but not this package. It apparently > > > cras

Re: [Cooker] libraw1394 Rebuild Problems

On Monday 29 April 2002 01:38 pm, you wrote: > On Sunday 28 April 2002 08:58 pm, you wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 07:15:01PM -0500, nDiScReEt wrote: > > > I installed LM 8.2 with gcc 3.04 only. I can not rebuild > > > libraw1394-0.9.0-2mdk.src.rpm

Re: [Cooker] PLF site down

On Monday 29 April 2002 01:23 pm, you wrote: > On Monday 29 April 2002 20:03, nDiScReEt wrote: > > On Monday 29 April 2002 05:00 am, you wrote: > > > Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > > > Not really a cooker :-) but > > > > > > > > http://plf.zarb

Re: [Cooker] SUB cooker

On Monday 29 April 2002 01:36 pm, you wrote: > On Mon Apr 29 13:16 -0400, Dave Seff wrote: > > On Monday 29 April 2002 11:13 am, J T wrote: > > > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here > > > > What is this crap? > > Just a standard newbie not reading the instructions

Re: [Cooker] libraw1394 Rebuild Problems

On Sunday 28 April 2002 08:58 pm, you wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 07:15:01PM -0500, nDiScReEt wrote: > > I installed LM 8.2 with gcc 3.04 only. I can not rebuild > > libraw1394-0.9.0-2mdk.src.rpm. I get the following error: > > > > checking for working automak

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libalsa2-0.9.0-0.4rc1mdk

On Monday 29 April 2002 07:27 am, you wrote: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:22:57 +0200 > > Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > and the cds can get usefull to prevent birds from eating all fruits in > > cherry tree :-) > > Since I normally get 2 or 3 a week I use AOL cds for that. > Am also

Re: [Cooker] PLF site down

On Monday 29 April 2002 05:00 am, you wrote: > Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > Not really a cooker :-) but > > > > http://plf.zarb.org/ > > > > Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access / on this server. > > > > - > >--- -

[Cooker] libraw1394 Rebuild Problems

I installed LM 8.2 with gcc 3.04 only. I can not rebuild libraw1394-0.9.0-2mdk.src.rpm. I get the following error: checking for working automake... found checking for working autoheader... found checking for working makeinfo... found checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc

Re: [Cooker] MakeCD

Robert hedges wrote: >>>What is the version of your makecd? Mine is mkcd-2.8.1-1mdk. I'm not >>>using the Cooker mkcd-2.8.5-1mdk. I tend to always have problems when I >>>use a Cooker rpm version before all packages can be made into a cd >>>without any dependency errors. >>> >> >>I'm running th

Re: [Cooker] Cooker Partitioning

Borsenkow Andrej wrote: >>with Cooker. Actually, / can be used for both, correct? I won't need >> > to > >>create a seperate / for Cooker, right? >> > > No. > > > -andrej > > > > No to the last question or the one before that? ... or both? -- Altoine B Maximum Time Unlimited Chicago Bas

  1   2   >