On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:15:30PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
http://www.suse.co.uk/uk/private/download/updates/90_i386.html
Except if you use their .patch.rpms:
RPM XFree86 4.3.0.1 (i586) 9938 kB
Patch-RPM XFree86 4.3.0.1-patch (i586)344 kB
At present we make huge updates (
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:27, Teletchéa Stéphane wrote:
> I'm contributing also to translation in French and i found many tiny
> bugs ... not very important in reality, but annoying, like
> milsleading translations in urpmi manual page, ...
This is good, not because they were there, but because they
Le mar 28/10/2003 à 13:40, Eric Fernandez a écrit :
> Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >Yes, for an operating system that is intended to remove the need for
> >Windows, the most critical feature is the version number on the software
> >which you should never need to use after installing it.
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vedran Ljubovic wrote:
> --- Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>For Stephane : I disagree there are a lot of bugs in
>>the distro. The
>>fact that the updates are big in size does not mean
>>there are a lot of
>>bugs. You may correct one lit
--- Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For Stephane : I disagree there are a lot of bugs in
> the distro. The
> fact that the updates are big in size does not mean
> there are a lot of
> bugs. You may correct one little bug in KDe and
> anyway have to release
> 100MB of updated rpm.
T
Buchan Milne wrote:
Yes, for an operating system that is intended to remove the need for
Windows, the most critical feature is the version number on the software
which you should never need to use after installing it.
Maybe next time we should rather fix that than worrying about newer
package
Le mar 28/10/2003 à 12:47, Buchan Milne a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Diego Iastrubni wrote:
>
> > i just wanted to say LOL!!!
> >
> > the title of the install disk (under windows of course) says 9.1!
> > oh my god... i cannot beleave that your released it? w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> i just wanted to say LOL!!!
>
> the title of the install disk (under windows of course) says 9.1!
> oh my god... i cannot beleave that your released it? whats next? calling
> it "debian"? LOL
Yes, for an operating sy
Eric Fernandez wrote:
When you insert the CD 1 of download edition (not tried with the
powerpack) under Windows, the Welcome window shows 9.1 instead of 9.2.
It is such details that make people say the distribution is rushed and
not polished...
Polishing is VERY important, and Mandrake should t
When you insert the CD 1 of download edition (not tried with the
powerpack) under Windows, the Welcome window shows 9.1 instead of 9.2.
It is such details that make people say the distribution is rushed and
not polished...
Polishing is VERY important, and Mandrake should take care of it for the
10 matches
Mail list logo