Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-29 Thread Luca Berra
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:15:30PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: http://www.suse.co.uk/uk/private/download/updates/90_i386.html Except if you use their .patch.rpms: RPM XFree86 4.3.0.1 (i586) 9938 kB Patch-RPM XFree86 4.3.0.1-patch (i586)344 kB At present we make huge updates (

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Leon Brooks
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:27, Teletchéa Stéphane wrote: > I'm contributing also to translation in French and i found many tiny > bugs ... not very important in reality, but annoying, like > milsleading translations in urpmi manual page, ... This is good, not because they were there, but because they

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Teletchéa Stéphane
Le mar 28/10/2003 à 13:40, Eric Fernandez a écrit : > Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > > > > > >Yes, for an operating system that is intended to remove the need for > >Windows, the most critical feature is the version number on the software > >which you should never need to use after installing it. > >

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vedran Ljubovic wrote: > --- Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>For Stephane : I disagree there are a lot of bugs in >>the distro. The >>fact that the updates are big in size does not mean >>there are a lot of >>bugs. You may correct one lit

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For Stephane : I disagree there are a lot of bugs in > the distro. The > fact that the updates are big in size does not mean > there are a lot of > bugs. You may correct one little bug in KDe and > anyway have to release > 100MB of updated rpm. T

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Eric Fernandez
Buchan Milne wrote: Yes, for an operating system that is intended to remove the need for Windows, the most critical feature is the version number on the software which you should never need to use after installing it. Maybe next time we should rather fix that than worrying about newer package

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Teletchéa Stéphane
Le mar 28/10/2003 à 12:47, Buchan Milne a écrit : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Diego Iastrubni wrote: > > > i just wanted to say LOL!!! > > > > the title of the install disk (under windows of course) says 9.1! > > oh my god... i cannot beleave that your released it? w

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Diego Iastrubni wrote: > i just wanted to say LOL!!! > > the title of the install disk (under windows of course) says 9.1! > oh my god... i cannot beleave that your released it? whats next? calling > it "debian"? LOL Yes, for an operating sy

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Diego Iastrubni
Eric Fernandez wrote: When you insert the CD 1 of download edition (not tried with the powerpack) under Windows, the Welcome window shows 9.1 instead of 9.2. It is such details that make people say the distribution is rushed and not polished... Polishing is VERY important, and Mandrake should t

[Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Eric Fernandez
When you insert the CD 1 of download edition (not tried with the powerpack) under Windows, the Welcome window shows 9.1 instead of 9.2. It is such details that make people say the distribution is rushed and not polished... Polishing is VERY important, and Mandrake should take care of it for the