On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:00, François Pons wrote:
> >
> > tell Juan to include my supermount to make it possible :)
>
> Ah, does it means the current kernel doesn't support this functionnalities
> ?
Well, I have been trying to harrass Juan about this for a few months now. It
would probably fix
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Eric Fernandez wrote:
> Hi
>
> and what about using supermount-ng ? ;)
>
> Zeb
we were talking about that:
supermount-ng==andrey's supermount
d.
>
>
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 14:07, François Pons wrote:
> "Andrey Borzenkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Can you make /proc/fs/supermount/subfs owner the user who has control
> > > over the floppy device ?
> >
> > the simplest way is to use pam_console to reassign ownership.
> > I'll get a look
[...]
> >
> > I suggest trying pam_console first, if we hit problems. let's solve
> > them. /proc/fs/supermount/subfs is available as soon as supermount
> > modules is loaded so it does not depend on mounting/unmounting.
>
apparently you can't change mode or owner of files under /proc. So
it ha
"Andrey Borzenkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can you make /proc/fs/supermount/subfs owner the user who has control over the
> > floppy device ?
>
> the simplest way is to use pam_console to reassign ownership.
> I'll get a look. will it be OK?
Yes, but I didn't checked if it was not workin
-Original Message-
>
> "Andrey Borzenkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 19:11 ---
> > > Yes, a setuid wrapper could be made for exemple to solve the problem.
> >
> > > I don't know if supermount can be modified s
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
>
> > Maybe Juan is working on a better version ?
>
> There is no better version.
>
> > In fact I don't know ( and Juan silence concerning this is disturbing ),
> > but what I know is that we need a reliable and fully functionnal
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Eric Fernandez wrote:
> Hi
>
> and what about using supermount-ng ? ;)
>
> Zeb
we were talking about that:
supermount-ng==andrey's supermount
d.
>
>
Hi
and what about using supermount-ng ? ;)
Zeb
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:00, François Pons wrote:
> >
> > tell Juan to include my supermount to make it possible :)
>
> Ah, does it means the current kernel doesn't support this functionnalities
> ?
Well, I have been trying to harrass Juan about this for a few months now. It
would probably fix
"Andrey Borzenkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 19:11 ---
> > Yes, a setuid wrapper could be made for exemple to solve the problem.
>
> > I don't know if supermount can be modified safely to release floppy as soon as
> > an app
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 19:11 ---
> Yes, a setuid wrapper could be made for exemple to solve the problem.
> I don't know if supermount can be modified safely to release floppy as soon as
> an application try to open /dev/fd0 in writing, but it should b
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2846
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2846
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 17:57 ---
Does this mean, that there will be no way for the user to format a floppy unless
he becomes root and unmounts the floppy first ? That's pretty bad, since most
people do
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2846
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2846
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|UNCONFIRME
16 matches
Mail list logo
