On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:09:42PM +0400, Vadim Plessky wrote:
I would like to have option of TRUE HOME INSTALL for Mandrake LINUX.
Sorry, I don't get what you mean by true home install, or to be more
precise, I seem to have a different understanding of a true home install.
Under this, I
-no X-utilities (xbill, xcreensaver, xclock, etc.)
Huh? Why should a home install have no games, screensavers or clocks?
What's the purpose of this?
If you don't have any x utils then I don't know what you would like to do
with X ... kde / gnome stuff is still X based.
-selection of
Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yo!
[...]
All i'm asking for is a "Console Server Install" installs only the
basics not X,
KDE, GNOME, let the user add to the installation, (add inn, openldap,
postgres)
heck even make them standard if you want. It would be easier for me
I would like to have option of TRUE HOME INSTALL for Mandrake LINUX.
Under this, I mean:
-no development tolls/compilers/headers
-no X-utilities (xbill, xcreensaver, xclock, etc.)
-selection of one or several windows managers
with selection of sub-packages to install (like: Install KDE2, but
I'd really like to see a server only install. Something that doesn't
install any X, KDE, GNOME, etc. Just a good ol console runing server
that (take an example from openbsd) is secure by default.
Really drives me nuts when I do a server install of Mandrake and it
proceeds to install a bunch of
:21 -0800
From: Jason Jeremias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] A true Server install
I'd really like to see a server only install. Something that doesn't
install any X, KDE, GNOME, etc. Just a good ol console runing server
that (take
Jason Jeremias wrote:
I'd really like to see a server only install. Something that doesn't
install any X, KDE, GNOME, etc. Just a good ol console runing server
that (take an example from openbsd) is secure by default.
Really drives me nuts when I do a server install of Mandrake and it
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, you wrote:
I'd really like to see a server only install. Something that doesn't
install any X, KDE, GNOME, etc.
Really drives me nuts when I do a server install of Mandrake and it
proceeds to install a bunch of stuff I would never put on my server.
Then I spend the
Yo!
[...]
in a way this is just mandrake, lots of linuces install without a desktop,
because they seem to have been distributed with less of a
one-size-fits-all approach. to be fair 7.0 was also easy to pull the
desktop out and run a server only install. i haven't attempted since, but
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:18:55AM -0700, David Dennis wrote:
Question: This list seems primarily focused for employees of
Mandrake-Cooker. I would prefer not to bog down this list with long
winded comment off topic here -- would you be able to recommend a mail
list more appropriate to a
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 08:09:21AM -0800, Jason Jeremias wrote:
I'd really like to see a server only install. Something that doesn't
install any X, KDE, GNOME, etc. Just a good ol console runing server
that (take an example from openbsd) is secure by default.
That's Mandrake. Imagine,
William H Bouterse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would also be helpful for rapid
minimal size non-X server installs
select nothing and you'll get it! Well not truly minimal,
but around 150MB (in expert)
the true minimum is around 80MB (at least will be when glibc is stripped, 14MB
worth
Alexander Skwar wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 08:09:21AM -0800, Jason Jeremias wrote:
I'd really like to see a server only install. Something that doesn't
install any X, KDE, GNOME, etc. Just a good ol console runing server
that (take an example from openbsd) is secure by default.
appropriate to a reply such as this?
-Dave Dennis
Seattle WA
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Jason Jeremias wrote:
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:09:21 -0800
From: Jason Jeremias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] A true Server install
I'd really
Geoffrey Lee wrote:
Yo!
[...]
in a way this is just mandrake, lots of linuces install without a desktop,
because they seem to have been distributed with less of a
one-size-fits-all approach. to be fair 7.0 was also easy to pull the
desktop out and run a server only install. i
I'd really like to see a server only
install. Something that doesn't install any
X, KDE, GNOME, etc.
Really drives me nuts when I do a server
install of Mandrake and it proceeds to
install a bunch of stuff I would never put
on my server. Then I spend the next hour
looking at rpm -qa
Yo!
[...]
All i'm asking for is a "Console Server Install" installs only the
basics not X,
KDE, GNOME, let the user add to the installation, (add inn, openldap,
postgres)
heck even make them standard if you want. It would be easier for me to
un install
a few server services then what I
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
That's Mandrake. Imagine, Mandrake also requires lilo *AND* grub, god knows
why.
Do we really need the bashing? They made a determination about what they think
should be included in the package. They heard your opinion on it.
18 matches
Mail list logo
