Armisis Aieoln wrote:
I agree.
Dave
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 19:38, you wrote:
michael wrote:
Groovy with me!
Michael Brown wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned
It appears from over here that they are dumping the
expensive heads that they brought in specifically for
a US ipo. If that is the case it is a good move since
the time is not right for that. I hope that they don't
become too provincial though... it is good to have
input from various
On Monday 21 May 2001 11:45 pm, you stuttered :
It appears from over here that they are dumping the
expensive heads that they brought in specifically for
a US ipo. If that is the case it is a good move since
the time is not right for that. I hope that they don't
become too provincial
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
into the company that you are also putting effort
into.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
If mandrake opens to devloper investment I would be highly intrested. But
would of course need as much info as possible on the company before I would
deside anything for sure.
dave
(I am a US Citizen living and working in the UK)
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 08:45, you wrote:
It appears from over
Groovy with me!
Michael Brown wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
into the company that you are also putting
michael wrote:
Groovy with me!
Michael Brown wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
into the company that you are also putting
I am thinking more of arround $100.00 a month.
Dave
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 16:02, you wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned company with the ability to
I agree.
Dave
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 19:38, you wrote:
michael wrote:
Groovy with me!
Michael Brown wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned company with the
On Sun, 20 May 2001, SI Reasoning wrote:
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
into the company that you are also putting effort
into.
Sounds like a good idea to me. What is the
Now this is sounding intresting
Dave
On Monday 21 May 2001 12:03, you wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2001, SI Reasoning wrote:
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
into the
On Monday 21 May 2001 08:29 pm, you stammered:
Now this is sounding intresting
Dave
On Monday 21 May 2001 12:03, you wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2001, SI Reasoning wrote:
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer
With reference to your statement in relation to revenue, and hard times
in relation to cash, would Mandrake consider a user/developer investment
plan. I'd rather invest direct in Mandrake, than purchase a boxed set
where a considerable portion of the revenue goes to the box makers,
box shifters
So sprach John J. Allen am Sun, May 20, 2001 at 09:02:05PM +:
With reference to your statement in relation to revenue, and hard times
in relation to cash, would Mandrake consider a user/developer investment
plan. I'd rather invest direct in Mandrake, than purchase a boxed set
where a
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
into the company that you are also putting effort
into.
--- Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So sprach John J. Allen am Sun, May 20,
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Blue Lizard wrote:
self-advertisements in the installer could be replaced with commercials
where users could 'click to receive more information when the install is
finished'. And upon completion of install, either in program but from
hd or on first boot a message,
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 04:45:47AM -0400, Yura Gusev wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Blue Lizard wrote:
self-advertisements in the installer could be replaced with commercials
where users could 'click to receive more information when the install is
finished'. And upon completion of install,
I don't see how the project I mentioned could not be
run that much differently than other Mandrake Open
Source projects... Since most of the coding and bug
checking is done by the community the only thing
Mandrake would be doing is getting the ball rolling as
another service
On 17 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
All IT and Linux companies seem to be facing the same situation,
currently.
Other than the obvious (buying boxed sets, donating directly), what are
the ways that we can help generate extra income?
Thanks :-).
Actually I don't know. I think
So sprach SI Reasoning am Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:14:43PM -0700:
I don't see how the project I mentioned could not be
run that much differently than other Mandrake Open
Source projects... Since most of the coding and bug
checking is done by the community the only thing
Mandrake would be
Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach SI Reasoning am Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:14:43PM -0700:
I don't see how the project I mentioned could not be
run that much differently than other Mandrake Open
Source projects... Since most of the coding and bug
checking is done by the community the
Once upon a time I spewed out about 32 million ideas to chmou and warly
about features for 80 81. I was on a whole lotta caffeine and about 12
days of coding. Included were ideas for sponsored ads in various places
where it would cost mandrake nothing. For instance, those useless
Bad idea...bad bad!
I would flee screaming
audio ads while booting up?
ads to annoy admins while installing computers (bad
target audience)
the problem now is that people are not paying much for
ads right now (mostly because they seem to think that
ads are only effective if clicked though...as
Well, I've done the donation thing. One idea I've had: is Mandrake going
to be present at the Linux Expo in Birmingham, UK in September? If not,
then I'll be there anyway, as part of a non-profit, Linux-in-education
group with two demonstration machines running Mandrake, and I could
possibly
Then why not partner with someone who is already
trying to do something like this. There are still a
few companies out there looking to make a name for
themselves... a partnership with Mandrake could be the
best of both worlds... as Mandrake can use its
strength of developing the software and
Ok.. I've been toying with a software developement idea for the past few
months and this thread kind of brought it to the surface. The software I'm
writing is basically a web based front end for a rather complicated
database. Though it's targeted at a specific industry I believe it to be a
rather
I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have a linux enhanced
web portal... with email , calendering, etc... that
sync's with netscape, outlook,
SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have a linux enhanced
web portal... with email , calendering,
SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have a linux enhanced
web portal... with email , calendering,
What does mandrake need to make this a viable option?
dave
On Thursday 17 May 2001 15:04, you wrote:
SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
and allowed for such things as photo
On Thursday 17 May 2001 07:07 am, you wrote:
SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have a linux
Cash.
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What does mandrake need to make this a viable option?
dave
On Thursday 17 May 2001 15:04, you wrote:
SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
within
Brook Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 17 May 2001 07:07 am, you wrote:
SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
On 17 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have a linux enhanced
web portal... with
Michael Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
All IT and Linux companies seem to be facing the same situation,
currently.
Other than the obvious (buying boxed sets, donating directly), what are
the ways that we can help generate extra income?
Thanks :-).
Actually I don't know. I
Ill think on this may be there is way Mandrake can advertise cheaply or free
in some cases. Ill get back with you on this.
Dave
On Thursday 17 May 2001 20:32, you wrote:
Michael Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
All IT and Linux companies seem to be facing the same situation,
36 matches
Mail list logo
