[Cooker] Enlightenment is not installed with "other desktops"

2003-09-10 Thread Eric Fernandez
At install, it is offered to install : KDE, Gnome, or Other Desktops. Decription of "Other Desktops" includes enlightenment, but E is not installed, it has to be installed separately. Eric

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment-1.7 packaging

2003-01-14 Thread Warly
roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Willing to volunteer to start packing this desktop into SRPM. > > The only problem is trying to get a cvs snapshot to build without > errors. ~2 mos ago, evas was being a real pain in the arse when trying > to get apps that depend on it to build properly. Trac

[Cooker] Enlightenment-1.7 packaging

2003-01-10 Thread roger
Willing to volunteer to start packing this desktop into SRPM. The only problem is trying to get a cvs snapshot to build without errors. ~2 mos ago, evas was being a real pain in the arse when trying to get apps that depend on it to build properly. Traced everything back to evas from what I recal

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment in current cooker

2002-04-02 Thread Charles A Edwards
On 02 Apr 2002 19:59:39 -0800 Curtis H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've run into the same problem. Here's what I noticed: Dropping to a > console and doing a ps shows that there are two instances of > enlightenment running. Killing the one that lists the old theme > unfreezes E. > Did

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment in current cooker

2002-04-02 Thread Curtis H
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 11:21, Charles A Edwards wrote: > Running current cooker and enlightenment when changing the theme or choosing restart enlightenment you get the spinning hand clock face as is normal but it thinks it is the 'energizer bunny' and keeps going and going and going. > Alt-Ctrl-Ba

[Cooker] Enlightenment in current cooker

2002-04-02 Thread Charles A Edwards
Running current cooker and enlightenment when changing the theme or choosing restart enlightenment you get the spinning hand clock face as is normal but it thinks it is the 'energizer bunny' and keeps going and going and going. Alt-Ctrl-Backspace is required. On login the newly selected theme h

Re: [Cooker] enlightenment-theme-error

2002-01-07 Thread Stefan Hußfeldt
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:37:20PM -0900, William Bouterse wrote: > cooker 20011224 > enlightenment-0.16.5-6mdk > bluesSteel theme gives error on startup; > CONFIG:missing required data in "100 PROGRESS_TEXT_NUMBER" > CONFIG:missing required data in " 5vixar/12" > CONFIG:missing required data in

[Cooker] enlightenment-theme-error

2002-01-06 Thread William Bouterse
cooker 20011224 enlightenment-0.16.5-6mdk bluesSteel theme gives error on startup; CONFIG:missing required data in "100 PROGRESS_TEXT_NUMBER" CONFIG:missing required data in " 5vixar/12" CONFIG:missing required data in " 204_EFFECT_NONE" clicking "ignore this" through the three error messages W

[Cooker] Enlightenment Desktop is totally messed up.

2001-09-23 Thread david
The Enlightenment Desktop is totally crapped out. Duplicate icons on top of others and the duplicates are paper icons. Including a pic. Disabling the left-mouse button for Enlightenment menus and having to use the middle button is bad enough, but with the icon desktop problem the manager is Ugly

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-15 Thread Vadim Plessky
On Wednesday 14 March 2001 1:18, Vox wrote: | > On Tuesday 13 March 2001 2:56, you wrote: | > Will specfile from E 0.16 work for it? (I'd like to build Binary RPM) | | I don't think the specfile for 16 will work on 1717 is made of a | whole lot of stuff that 16 doesn't havea

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
edb and imlib2 are both tagged as 1.0.x, you can go to rasterman.com and have a look. btw Geoffrey was to hasty to put it in contrib I've already done that, just not ready to upload it :D Abel Cheung On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Vadim Plessky wrote: > Ok, may be I will try tar.gz from them.

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Vox
During the bombing raid on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:45:50 +, Vadim Plessky was heard mumbling in fear:: > On Tuesday 13 March 2001 2:56, you wrote: > | Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Vadim > | > | Plessky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > | > Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Vadim Plessky
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 11:17, you wrote: |> It also would be nice to hear from Mandrake what is Etox, on which | Mandrake |> people working? :-) | [...] | with the new version. And "Mandrake" in this case would be Geoff | "Mandrake" Harrison, | which is used the name mandrake lo

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Stefan Hußfeldt
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:14:35PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: > Would be nice to have Eterm-0.9 to. *That* would be fine ;) -- Und Tschüss. Stefan ### Kilroy was here ### 6037 12:40pm up 4 days

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Joakim Bodin
Vadim Plessky wrote: > Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. > From what I have seen on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many > improvements and new features, comparing to E 0.16. > > I have checked Cooker - it still holds E 0.16. Do you plan to update it? > (imlib2 i

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Vadim > Plessky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > > Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen on > > Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and new > > feature

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Vadim Plessky
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 2:56, you wrote: | Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Vadim | | Plessky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : | > Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen | > on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and | > new f

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Frederic Crozat
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Vadim Plessky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen on > Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and new > features, comparing to E 0.16. I have checked Cooker - it still

[Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Vadim Plessky
Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. >From what I have seen on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and new features, comparing to E 0.16. I have checked Cooker - it still holds E 0.16. Do you plan to update it? (imlib2 is also missing) "... a *LOT* of wor

[Cooker] enlightenment-conf not included ??

2001-02-12 Thread Prana
Hiya, Just wondering if Cooker will include enlightenment-conf for 7.3 . I saw the SRPMS in Cooker SRPMS directory, but the package was not included in Mandrake 7.2 though... -- Prana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cyest.org My GnuPG Key ID: 0x33343FD3 (2000-07-21) Key fingerprint = F1FB 1F76 8

Re: [Cooker] enlightenment

2001-02-08 Thread andre
> > > The /etc/X11/wmsession.d/04enlightenment file is wrong. > > -EXEC=/usr/bin/enlightenment > +EXEC=/usr/X11R6/bin/enlightenment > > seb > > > Also enlightenment.install is broken. It produces a .xession pointing to /usr/bin/enlightenment and not /usr/X11R6/bin/enlightenment

[Cooker] enlightenment

2001-02-08 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
The /etc/X11/wmsession.d/04enlightenment file is wrong. -EXEC=/usr/bin/enlightenment +EXEC=/usr/X11R6/bin/enlightenment seb

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment

2000-10-29 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Geoffrey Lee wrote: > Yo, > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:10:00PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: > > sebastid@s186b:~$ /usr/sbin/chksession -x=Enlightenment > > #!/bin/sh > > > > [ -f $HOME ] || { > > /usr/bin/enlightenment.install > > } > > exec /usr/bin/enlightenment >

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment

2000-10-29 Thread Geoffrey Lee
Yo, On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:10:00PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: > sebastid@s186b:~$ /usr/sbin/chksession -x=Enlightenment > #!/bin/sh > > [ -f $HOME ] || { > /usr/bin/enlightenment.install > } > exec /usr/bin/enlightenment > Umm, probably should be -d $HOME ... > -- > > Can anyone t

[Cooker] Enlightenment

2000-10-29 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
sebastid@s186b:~$ /usr/sbin/chksession -x=Enlightenment #!/bin/sh [ -f $HOME ] || { /usr/bin/enlightenment.install } exec /usr/bin/enlightenment -- Can anyone tell me what the use of this is? [ -f $HOME ] will ALWAYS return false. seb

[Cooker] enlightenment

2000-06-29 Thread dam's
the "enlightenment nouveau" is there. it's better late than never. 0.16.4 Try it and enjoy. -- dam's

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.16.4

2000-05-11 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Soulier, Frederic P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Any plan to have v0.16.4 in Mdk 7.1? eh we're frozen for ages now!!! > (I am still seing changelog for ver: 0.16.3 rel: mdk11) -- Guillaume Cottenceau

[Cooker] Enlightenment 0.16.4

2000-05-11 Thread Soulier, Frederic P
Hi, Any plan to have v0.16.4 in Mdk 7.1? (I am still seing changelog for ver: 0.16.3 rel: mdk11) Cheers, Fred

[Cooker] Enlightenment 0.16.4 released

2000-04-29 Thread aNdreas sChwarz [sUbaRt]
Hi !! I have seen that Enlightenment 0.16.4 is out now ! cu !

[Cooker] Enlightenment problems

1999-12-29 Thread Christos Varelas
Hi there and greetings from Greece. I just performed an ftp installation of Oxygen beta on a fresh partition. I had no problem but when I started the system (runlevel 5) and chose to login to Enlightenment, when I tried to move the help windows my system just froze up --I had to hardware reset it

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment

1999-11-08 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Paul Duran wrote: > I believe that 0.16.2 came out like under a day ago... > > Maybe a little patience is in order? :) Was it that soon? I thought it was longer than that... hmmm... sorry then... just a little eager I suppose... =) Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ:

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment

1999-11-07 Thread Paul Duran
I believe that 0.16.2 came out like under a day ago... Maybe a little patience is in order? :) On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 11:47:19PM -0700, Vincent Danen wrote: > When are we going to see the new E? It's up to 0.16.2 now, but cooker > just has 0.16.1. > > Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ:

[Cooker] Enlightenment

1999-11-07 Thread Vincent Danen
When are we going to see the new E? It's up to 0.16.2 now, but cooker just has 0.16.1. Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ: 16978834 http://shx.tzo.net . telnet://shx.tzo.net . http://tux.tzo.net BBBS/LiI . Internet Rex for Linux Beta . Stronghold Enterprises/X BBS Check out the new Linux I