On Friday 21 March 2003 23:27, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
If not the iso images, why not repair the buggy cooker that avoid the
creation of runing isos?
I don't know what problems people have been having making .iso's but I have
been making DVD sized .iso's for absolutely ages; made on
Viestissä Lauantai 22. Maaliskuuta 2003 09:34, Duncan kirjoitti:
On Fri 21 Mar 2003 05:56, Brian J. Murrell posted as excerpted below:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:42:33PM +1200, Jason Greenwood wrote:
Will 9.1 Final ISO's hit the mirrors??
I would like to know this too.
Just what are
On Sat 22 Mar 2003 03:19, Thomas Backlund posted as excerpted below:
Now this is way off ...
IIRC Warly (or another MDK employee) posted a message after 9.0 release how
the official ISOs gets delivered ...
They don't get posted on the mirrors after a automated iso build,
instead they get
On Sat 22 Mar 2003 03:19, Thomas Backlund posted as excerpted below:
Now this is way off ...
IIRC Warly (or another MDK employee) posted a message after 9.0 release how
the official ISOs gets delivered ...
They don't get posted on the mirrors after a automated iso build,
instead
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 14:39, Sir Pingus wrote:
On Sat 22 Mar 2003 03:19, Thomas Backlund posted as excerpted below:
Now this is way off ...
IIRC Warly (or another MDK employee) posted a message after 9.0 release how
the official ISOs gets delivered ...
They don't get posted on
Can someone from Mandrake please update the users and testers about the
state of the ISO images ? The people are very excited about it and it's
not nice to let them wait so much time without knowing whats going on.
Many thanks in advance.
Phazeman
If not the iso images, why not repair the buggy cooker that avoid the creation
of runing isos?
El Sábado, 22 de Marzo de 2003 00:18, Phazeman escribió:
Can someone from Mandrake please update the users and testers about the
state of the ISO images ? The people are very excited about it and
On Fri 21 Mar 2003 16:18, Phazeman posted as excerpted below:
Can someone from Mandrake please update the users and testers about the
state of the ISO images ? The people are very excited about it and it's
not nice to let them wait so much time without knowing whats going on.
See my post to
Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
It is unpacked in many places and you can install via ftp - but, for
those having slow connection, how do you imagine ftp install? (Just a
bit of math, how long do you need to transfer 150MB over 56Kb modem.
Even if it 56Kb?)
Well, on my 33.6 kb modem, I would expect
Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
It is unpacked in many places and you can install via ftp - but, for
those having slow connection, how do you imagine ftp install? (Just a
bit of math, how long do you need to transfer 150MB over 56Kb modem.
Even if it 56Kb?)
Well, on my 33.6 kb modem, I
Op maandag 20 augustus 2001 15:20, schreef u:
On 20 Aug 2001 20:53:08 -0400, Wim Horst wrote:
Is it possible to install directly from a iso image file,
thus without first burning a cd. I don't have a cdwriter.
yes, using hd.img. You will be prompted. This is a question for the
newbie
If someone can point me at HTTP-accessible ISO images, I'd be happy
to register them with www.swarmcast.com -- it doesn't really matter
if the site has limited bandwidth since swarmcasting uses less
bandwidth as the demand rises.
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: office voice/fax: 01
B == Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think you could install from the ISO image unless you
have a second machine (you can mount an ISO image as a file
system on that machine and then export it under NFS, FTP or
HTTP)
B Of course you can. Using
Is it possible to install directly from a iso image file,
thus without first burning a cd. I don't have a cdwriter.
On 20 Aug 2001 20:53:08 -0400, Wim Horst wrote:
Is it possible to install directly from a iso image file,
thus without first burning a cd. I don't have a cdwriter.
yes, using hd.img. You will be prompted. This is a question for the
newbie (or expert if newbie is unsuccessful) list. It is
I don't think you could install from the ISO image unless you have a
second machine (you can mount an ISO image as a file system on that
machine and then export it under NFS, FTP or HTTP)
For those of us on slow connections, and especially for those of us
who do not use even a small percent of
I don't think you could install from the ISO image unless you have a
second machine (you can mount an ISO image as a file system on that
machine and then export it under NFS, FTP or HTTP)
I do not think or I have tried and it failed?
Of course you can. Using either ext2 or fat partition
]
Subject: [Cooker] iso images Beta 8.0
Hello folks,
Who can help me?
Here the situiation.
I have downloaded the cooker iso images 1-Cooker-i586-20010213.iso and
2-Cooker-i586-20010213.iso in the directory cooker.
I get a menu:
.
Please choose the partition where is copied the Linu
de 2001 07:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] iso images Beta 8.0
Hello folks,
Who can help me?
Here the situiation.
I have downloaded the cooker iso images 1-Cooker-i586-20010213.iso and
2-Cooker-i586-20010213.iso in the directory cooker.
I
--
From: marco goerlach[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: sexta-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2001 07:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] iso images Beta 8.0
Hello folks,
Who can help me?
Here the situiation.
I have
Hello folks,
.
What must I do if I will install mandrake with iso images?
I get a error if the system want to install filessets from iso image 2.
.
with kind regards,
Marco
So what is the fix for the 34k first CD image? Is there a new mkcd.pl or are
there other fixes regarding the mirror tree?
Any help would be appreciated.
Chris
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, stephen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 01:19:35PM +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, stephen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:36:44AM +0100, stephen wrote:
...
I run this from my crontab every 2 hours 20 minutes.
stephen wrote:
[stephen@zmemw16 stephen]$ rsync -avv
sunsite.uio.no::/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/iso/Mandrake72-inst.iso \
/home/stephen/Mandrake72-inst.iso --partial --progress --stats
ERROR: The remote path must start with a module name
I probably got the source path to file wrong,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:18:34PM +0930, Allen Bolderoff wrote:
How about:
rsync -av remote.mirror.site::/path/to/iso
/localpath/to/iso --partial --progress --stats
[stephen@zmemw16 stephen]$ rsync -av sunsite.uio.no::Mandrake-iso
receiving file list ... done
drwxr-xr-x8192
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:36:44AM +0100, stephen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:18:34PM +0930, Allen Bolderoff wrote:
/localpath/to/iso --partial --progress --stats
permission denied.
unexpected EOF in read_timeout
does this translate as busy, go away ??
translates as did not
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, stephen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:36:44AM +0100, stephen wrote:
...
btinternet in their infinite something, drop the line every 2 hrs
and it's dynamic ip, not a problem when i use download 4 x
netscape downloads need stopping and restarting.. pain
what happens
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 01:19:35PM +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, stephen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:36:44AM +0100, stephen wrote:
...
btinternet in their infinite something, drop the line every 2 hrs
and it's dynamic ip, not a problem when i use download 4 x
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:18:34PM +0930, Allen Bolderoff wrote:
howabout
How about:
rsync -av remote.mirror.site::/path/to/iso
/localpath/to/iso --partial --progress --stats
[stephen@zmemw16 stephen]$ rsync -avv
sunsite.uio.no::/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/iso/Mandrake72-inst.iso \
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 06:56:33AM +0100, stephen wrote:
[stephen@zmemw16 stephen]$ rsync -avv
sunsite.uio.no::/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/iso/Mandrake72-inst.iso \
/home/stephen/Mandrake72-inst.iso --partial --progress --stats
ERROR: The remote path must start with a module name
You
howabout
xdelta delta -9 beta3.iso rc1.iso beta_2_rc1_upgrade.gz
How about:
rsync -av remote.mirror.site::/path/to/iso
/localpath/to/iso --partial --progress --stats
this will do effectively what diff does, and only brings down what is
required. ie if the file is the same in many places,
Is it relevant as to how the two data streams are compressed, we are
interested in compressing the difference stream.
might be to a pure maths type person, bit beyond mine
howabout
xdelta delta -9 beta3.iso rc1.iso beta_2_rc1_upgrade.gz
assuming xdelta can handle 640M files ;-)
it's been
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2a all RPMs come already compressed
RPMs are cpio archive + a rpm header (requirements, what is providing,
description, date, version, changelog and the like).
They're not compressed.
most SRPMs content is compressed.
stephen wrote:
Having only just finished downloading Beta3, the air became
slightly colourful when as browsing email I saw RC1 mentioned,
closely followed by a 'here we go again' feeling, my computer
is definitely moving out of my bedroom.
I should perhaps mention my modem, that's why I
Having only just finished downloading Beta3, the air became
slightly colourful when as browsing email I saw RC1 mentioned,
closely followed by a 'here we go again' feeling, my computer
is definitely moving out of my bedroom.
I should perhaps mention my modem, that's why I waited for
a slightly
stephen wrote:
I should perhaps mention my modem, that's why I waited for
a slightly longer lasting beta than 1 2 ;-)
Questions::
1. Would a binary difference file be possible ?
2. Would it necessaryily be significantly smaller ?
2a. How would it compress ?
3. If it was say 20-50%,
36 matches
Mail list logo
