Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
On 27 Apr 2000, Pixel wrote:
just change the symlink /etc/X11/X between /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_SVGA (or
whatever) and /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
What about the XF86Config file?
The config files are incompatible between these two Xfree releases.
You need the
Pixel wrote:
hey, you want to fight! Come, don't be afraid ;-)
no kidding, what are your grief about the XF86Config-4 generated by XFdrake?
Grief is such a hard word ... ;-) Okay.
Some of the modules that are automatically loaded from a xf86config
generated XF86Config file were missing in
Andreas Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The XFdrake generated one was near empty.
But I must say it is a couple of weeks ago, since I
last checked XFdrake. Maybe some things have changed
in the meanwhile. I dunno. I will give it an other try
this weekend ...
you'd better! couple of weeks
David Walluck a écrit :
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Gael Duval wrote:
- DrakX graphic installation procedure has been improved to ease
installation it now fully handles multi-CD installation
If I understand correctly, the first CD is 200 M? I have an upgraded
system, that I upgrade daily, and
- Now includes brand new XFree 4.0 servers, with new modular
architecture.
Can user select between XFree86 3 servers and 4 servers?
Ya, who can tell me how to switch between XFree86 v3 and XFree86 v4?
-- czhang
"Cheng Zhang" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Now includes brand new XFree 4.0 servers, with new modular
architecture.
Can user select between XFree86 3 servers and 4 servers?
Ya, who can tell me how to switch between XFree86 v3 and XFree86 v4?
just change the symlink /etc/X11/X
On 27 Apr 2000, Pixel wrote:
just change the symlink /etc/X11/X between /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_SVGA (or
whatever) and /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
What about the XF86Config file?
seb
Yo,
If I understand correctly, the first CD is 200 M? I have an upgraded
system, that I upgrade daily, and therefore don't have a way of installing
from CD.
- If Windows is also on the computer, DrakFont gives the user access
to his Windows fonts under Linux.
BUG: If C:/windows/fonts
Geoffrey Lee wrote:
ah, but not everyone likes qt ... one of them 's me ...because
i think the
license really sucks...
Gael.
--
Gael DUVAL - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mandrake.com
qt is ok, but gtk is much better in many ways;)
Nah,
"Geoffrey Lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Now includes brand new XFree 4.0 servers, with new modular
architecture.
Can user select between XFree86 3 servers and 4 servers?
so you want to install both xfree 3 and xfree 4? i doubt it..
Yes you can install XFree86 3.3.6 and
Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Geoffrey Lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Now includes brand new XFree 4.0 servers, with new modular
architecture.
Can user select between XFree86 3 servers and 4 servers?
[...]
so you want to install both xfree 3 and xfree 4? i
David Walluck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Gael Duval wrote:
- DrakX graphic installation procedure has been improved to ease
installation it now fully handles multi-CD installation
If I understand correctly, the first CD is 200 M?
nope, it is the 2nd cd.
[...]
John Grange [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Geoffrey Lee wrote:
ah, but not everyone likes qt ... one of them 's me ...because
i think the
license really sucks...
Gael.
--
Gael DUVAL - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mandrake.com
qt
Vandoorselaere Yoann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ok excuse My ignerence but what is the difference between GPL and LGPL? and
other such licences is there a good place to go to find out the different
licences and such
LGPL stand for "Library GPL"
bhh... not true anymore. tis
ok excuse My ignerence but what is the difference between GPL
and LGPL? and
other such licences is there a good place to go to find out the
different
licences and such
LGPL stand for "Library GPL" and allow a binary
program to link to a LGPL library.
No, not really. :-) i think a
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Pixel wrote:
LGPL stand for "Library GPL"
bhh... not true anymore. tis Lesser GPL now :pp
RMS recommends GPL even for libraries
Certainly he would. The GPL takes away rights that the LGPL left to the user.
Don't be fooled. The GPL is far from Free Software. It is
Richard Wackerbarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Pixel wrote:
LGPL stand for "Library GPL"
bhh... not true anymore. tis Lesser GPL now :pp
RMS recommends GPL even for libraries
Certainly he would. The GPL takes away rights that the LGPL left to the user.
- If Windows is also on the computer, DrakFont gives the user access
to his Windows fonts under Linux.
BUG: If C:/windows/fonts doesn't exist then check C:/winnt/fonts for
winnt
users (like me). You may even want to check a few more directories like
win95, win98, or something,
John P Cavanaugh a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 12:53:31AM +0200, Gael Duval wrote:
- DrakX graphic installation procedure has been improved to ease
installation it now fully handles multi-CD installation
I know that a lot of effort was put into the current graphical installer,
but
val [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 5:53 PM
Subject: [Cooker] Mandrake 7.1-BETA (Hydrogen) is available.
Hi everybody!
in the case you wouldn't have noticed, Mandrake 7.1 is available for
download and tests.
New features include:
* Hardware
- En
I know that a lot of effort was put into the current graphical
installer,
but I was wondering if anyone is reconsidering now that Qt Embed has
been released
really? where please? :)
ah, but not everyone likes qt ... one of them 's me ...because i think the
license really sucks...
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 02:04:05AM +0200, Gael Duval wrote:
John P Cavanaugh a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 12:53:31AM +0200, Gael Duval wrote:
- DrakX graphic installation procedure has been improved to ease
installation it now fully handles multi-CD installation
I know that
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
ah, but not everyone likes qt ... one of them 's me ...because i think the
license really sucks...
Oh please, but let's not get into the whole license thing... that's
already beaten to death. I did want to mention that it is classified as
Open Source,
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Gael Duval wrote:
- DrakX graphic installation procedure has been improved to ease
installation it now fully handles multi-CD installation
If I understand correctly, the first CD is 200 M? I have an upgraded
system, that I upgrade daily, and therefore don't have a way
ah, but not everyone likes qt ... one of them 's me ...because
i think the
license really sucks...
Gael.
--
Gael DUVAL - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mandrake.com
qt is ok, but gtk is much better in many ways;)
Nah, the QPL really sucks...even though
25 matches
Mail list logo
