Hi,
Think it should be a good idea too... many apps still rely on Qt2 and it would be time
saving
to have built in support for this (ATI's Radeon control panel does). At least for the
next year,
depending on apps' migration rate, it would be a good choice for backward
compatibility.
Best
Would it be possible to include qt2 in contribs for 9.0?
--
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was her love, she was my queen.
And now a thousand years between.
Linux 2.4.19-4mdklrr
3:30pm up 1 day, 1:10, 9 users, load average: 0.23, 0.43, 0.53
On Tue Sep 03 21:58 +0200, laurent Montel wrote:
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 21:38, Levi Ramsey wrote:
Would it be possible to include qt2 in contribs for 9.0?
No
Now all kde app use qt3/kde3.0, so it's not necessary to maintain a qt2
package.
However, various commercial apps (notably
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:19:31 -0400
Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
various commercial apps (notably Opera) do use Qt3.
Use the static version and you do not need a separate qt2.
Charles
--
Whatever it is, I fear Greeks even when they bring gifts.
--
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
This shouldn't be difficult, using %{expand...} and %(...) .
But even when kdelibs-devel is installed, one may still want to
compile a bootstrapped qt2 again; perhaps it'd be better to leave
the
David BAUDENS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--=-=-=
Name: qt2 Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 2.3.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 2mdk Build Date: Wed Jun 27 21:08:39
2001
- Rewrite %build
Hi,
Has anyone tried to use qt2-designer?
Mine does not work very well. The property window shows only the tooltip and
about properties and I cannot edit any slot. Am I the only one?
$ rpm -qa | grep qt
qt2-Xt-2.3.0-3mdk
libqt2-2.3.0-3mdk
libqt2-devel-2.3.0-3mdk
qt2-designer-2.3.0-3mdk
Hi cooker,
after upgrade to qt2-2.3.0-2, found a link as /usr/lib/libqxr.a pointing to
NOTHING.
Must point to /usr/lib/qt2/libqxt.a ???
???
Eric MC
Vadim Plessky écrivit :
Sunday 10 December 2000 23:27, Geoffrey Lee ???:
|By the way, does it make sense to have documentation header files
|specified as "i586"?
|IMHO, it should .noarch.
|
| Yes you are rgiht but IMHO you can't do that since if you do noarch the
|
Sunday 10 December 2000 23:27, Geoffrey Lee ???:
|By the way, does it make sense to have documentation header files
|specified as "i586"?
|IMHO, it should .noarch.
|
| Yes you are rgiht but IMHO you can't do that since if you do noarch the
| whole package will be noarch, which
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Vadim Plessky wrote:
There is no big problem at a moment, but I hope we will have Alpha and
PowerPC ports some time later.
It will be really stupid to have QT2-doc-xxx.i586.rpm, QT2-doc-xxx.alpha.rpm
and QT2-doc-xxx.powerpc.rpm, as they are exactly the same docs.
I uploaded QT-2.2-2 compiled for i686 architecture to my site:
http://htmltests.newmail.ru/qt2-2.2.2-1mdk.i686.rpm
Uploading speed was very low, so I was not able to upload qt2-doc and -devel
But I guess they should be the same with i586 architecture.
By the way, does it make sense to have
Yo.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:23:02PM +, Vadim Plessky wrote:
I uploaded QT-2.2-2 compiled for i686 architecture to my site:
http://htmltests.newmail.ru/qt2-2.2.2-1mdk.i686.rpm
Uploading speed was very low, so I was not able to upload qt2-doc and -devel
But I guess they should be
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000, Thomas M. Beaudry wrote:
On Thu, 02 Nov 2000, Christopher Molnar wrote:
Anyway's, don't know why it didn't compile be default. I am recompling a
fix right now and we will see if it works. Give me a few hours to get
some testing with it done and I will upload to
QT2 header files are in /usr/lib/qt2/include
But the QT1 header files are in /usr/include/qt
Is there a reason for this? Tried to compile something and it told me that I
had an old version of QT. It was easy to work around by just passing configure
the right option but was a little confusing.
I have it compiled back in, but now I just need to get it to upload. It was
real easy to add back to the rpm, the troll's makefile just didn't include
it.
Thanks. Now I'll be able to compile QtEZ again this weekend.
--
Thomas M. Beaudry - k8la/ys1ztm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's dead Jim.
Trying this question again. This is an essential peice of QT used for
internationalization.
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000, Thomas M. Beaudry wrote:
What happened to msg2qm? I was trying to compile the latest version of
QtEZ and discovered this file is missing. I have qt2-devel-2.2.1-3mdk.
--
On Thu, 02 Nov 2000, Christopher Molnar wrote:
Hello Thomas,
Hello
I am not ignoring you, it just takes me a while to get through close to
200+ emails (not to mention mailing list messages) in my inbox daily :-(
Only 200 lol No such implication. Easy to miss one message in
Cooker's
What happened to msg2qm? I was trying to compile the latest version of QtEZ
and discovered this file is missing. I have qt2-devel-2.2.1-3mdk.
--
Thomas M. Beaudry - k8la/ys1ztm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Drive C: Error, (A)bort (R)etry (I)gnore (K)ick (S)cream
the sources for qt2-2.2-0.1mdk have shown at the mirrors, but the
compiled
binaries have not.
from ftp.sunet.se mirror:
ftp cd SRPMS
250 CWD command successful.
ftp dir qt2*
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for /bin/ls.
-rw-r--r-- 1 ftpadm 7444509 Aug 7
Jürgen Zimmermann wrote:
the sources for qt2-2.2-0.1mdk have shown at the mirrors, but the
compiled
binaries have not.
try:
http://ftp.littlepenguin.org/RPMS/
--
Yours Sincerly,
Christian Zoffoli ''~``
Christian Zoffoli wrote:
Jürgen Zimmermann wrote:
the sources for qt2-2.2-0.1mdk have shown at the mirrors, but the
compiled
binaries have not.
try:
http://ftp.littlepenguin.org/RPMS/
ftp://ftp.littlepenguin.org/RPMS :)
--
Yours Sincerly,
It's now .2mdk
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, [iso-8859-1] Jürgen Zimmermann wrote:
the sources for qt2-2.2-0.1mdk have shown at the mirrors, but the
compiled
binaries have not.
from ftp.sunet.se mirror:
ftp cd SRPMS
250 CWD command successful.
ftp dir qt2*
200 PORT command successful.
150
qt2 = 2.2 is needed by kdelibs-1.92-12mdk
eh ? : )
--
Bryan Paxton
"Defacing the RIAA website would cause a major shitstorm for us good
guys." - someone
"Good point.
I still can't get over how Janet Reno's parents defaced her/it and they still
walk the streets free and clear." - someone else
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Bryan Paxton wrote:
qt2 = 2.2 is needed by kdelibs-1.92-12mdk
eh ? : )
it is, and it is on the mirrors. qt2-2.2-0.2mdk
Is it just me or is the qglobal.h file missing from our RPM?
--
_
_|_|_
( ) *Anton Graham
/v\ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/( )X
(m_m) GPG ID: 18F78541
Penguin Powered!
Which RPM are you talking about? -devel or regular?
- Original Message -
From: "Anton Graham" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Mandrake Cooker" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:05 AM
Subject: [Cooker] qt2 headers
Is it just me or is the qglobal.h file
/qt2 :) it is
a symlink to the one in QTDIR.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] qt2 headers
Which RPM are you talking about? -devel or regular?
- Original
The qt2 source RPM forces a build architecture of i586 or alpha. K6 can
safely be added to this... :o)
John
Hi,
I'm wondering why there is a "BuildArchitectures" line in the qt2 spec
file.
BuildArchitectures: i586
Is this package only meant for the i586 architecture, or can it also be
compiled
on other architectures (alpha or i686)? If so, can we do without the
line, or
can we add the other
Chmouel,
I'm wondering why there is a "BuildArchitectures" line in the qt2 spec
file.
BuildArchitectures: i586
Is this package only meant for the i586 architecture, or can it also be
compiled
on other architectures (alpha or i686)? If so, can we do without the
line, or
can we
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Chmouel,
I'm wondering why there is a "BuildArchitectures" line in the qt2 spec
file.
BuildArchitectures: i586
Is this package only meant for the i586 architecture, or can it also be
compiled
on other architectures (alpha
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, you wrote:
Eddy Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone managed to make the QT2 in Cooker compile anything? I've had
absolutely no luck so far.
what program do you use ?
I use this :
MOC=/usr/bin/moc2 QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt2/ ./configure --*
I see that
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Michael Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I use this :
MOC=/usr/bin/moc2 QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt2/ ./configure --*
I see that you don't run Mandrake yourself as there is no /usr/lib/qt2 when I
(root@kenobi)[/RPMS]-# rpm -qpl --changelog
Eddy Cooper wrote:
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Michael Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I use this :
MOC=/usr/bin/moc2 QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt2/ ./configure --*
I see that you don't run Mandrake yourself as there is no /usr/lib/qt2 when I
(root@kenobi)[/RPMS]-# rpm -qpl
Sergio Korlowsky wrote:
Eddy Cooper wrote:
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Michael Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I use this :
MOC=/usr/bin/moc2 QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt2/ ./configure --*
I see that you don't run Mandrake yourself as there is no /usr/lib/qt2 when I
Has anyone managed to make the QT2 in Cooker compile anything? I've had
absolutely no luck so far.
Eddy Cooper
37 matches
Mail list logo
