> "dany" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
dany> Juan,
dany> I'm working a bit on new kernel-multimedia again and noticed you removed
dany> PF_MEMDIE from the mdk kernel. This may cause a task not to die under OOM?
dany> According to this, you agreed to that:
dany> http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/li
Le Samedi 8 Mars 2003 22:14, Jean-Michel Dault a écrit :
> Le sam 08/03/2003 à 17:56, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> > Current apache2 conf load mod_cgi module, whereas documentation advises
> > to use mod_cgid on Unix platform. They only talk of performance issues,
> > but i was
>
> mod_cgid is supp
Le Dimanche 9 Mars 2003 00:39, Jean-Michel Dault a écrit :
> Le sam 08/03/2003 à 19:42, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> > > > Just an infinite wait for the reply, whereas the script runs
> > > > correctly from command line. Nothing in the logs, neither error nor
> > > > access. I tried the ScriptLog d
Le sam 08/03/2003 à 19:42, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> > > Just an infinite wait for the reply, whereas the script runs correctly
> > > from command line. Nothing in the logs, neither error nor access.
> > > I tried the ScriptLog directive without any further success.
> > What kind of CGI is that?
Le Samedi 8 Mars 2003 23:09, Jean-Michel Dault a écrit :
> Le sam 08/03/2003 à 18:55, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> > > > unable to run some CGI script with long output using mod_cgi.
> > >
> > > Weird... did you get an error message of some kind, or a sefgault?
> >
> > Just an infinite wait for the
Le sam 08/03/2003 à 18:55, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> > > unable to run some CGI script with long output using mod_cgi.
> > Weird... did you get an error message of some kind, or a sefgault?
> Just an infinite wait for the reply, whereas the script runs correctly from
> command line. Nothing in
Le Samedi 8 Mars 2003 22:14, Jean-Michel Dault a écrit :
> Le sam 08/03/2003 à 17:56, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> > Current apache2 conf load mod_cgi module, whereas documentation advises
> > to use mod_cgid on Unix platform. They only talk of performance issues,
> > but i was
>
> mod_cgid is supp
Le sam 08/03/2003 à 17:56, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> Current apache2 conf load mod_cgi module, whereas documentation advises to use
> mod_cgid on Unix platform. They only talk of performance issues, but i was
mod_cgid is supposed to be only for the threaded MPM, I'm even surprised
it runs!
>
Jeremy Salch wrote on Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 04:01:32PM -0500 :
> > > > Why are .rpmnew files created?
> > > Very annoying to have to go and upgrade all of the config files by
> > > hand!
> > Take a look at the etc-update RPM (comes with Mandrake 8.2, at least!).
> > It will let you either interacti
»R.I.P. Deaddog« sagte am 2002-04-29 um 05:06:02 +0800 :
> Probably check the access/modification time as well. I'm afraid
> that problem is deeper than mere md5 sum.
Hm, why is access/modification time important? Does Nautilus (the pkg
which I mentioned in one of my last mails) depend on those
On Sunday 28 April 2002 02:49 pm, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> On Sunday 28 April 2002 01:38 pm, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 02:17:24PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > > Why are .rpmnew files created?
> >
> > I just want to add an Me too to that question.
> >
> > Very annoy
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:45:24PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> >
> > The user or any script or something..
>
> In my case anyway, no. Nothing has edited these config files for
> which .rpmnew files are being created.
>
> Next time I do a
»Brian J. Murrell« sagte am 2002-04-28 um 16:53:40 -0400 :
> In my case anyway, no. Nothing has edited these config files for
> which .rpmnew files are being created.
AOL!
> Next time I do an update I will rpm -Va first and verify that none of
> the .rpmew files had and "md5" errors during the
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:45:24PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> The user or any script or something..
In my case anyway, no. Nothing has edited these config files for
which .rpmnew files are being created.
Next time I do an update I will rpm -Va first and verify that none of
the .rpm
On Sunday 28 April 2002 01:38 pm, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 02:17:24PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Why are .rpmnew files created?
>
> I just want to add an Me too to that question.
>
> Very annoying to have to go and upgrade all of the config files by
> hand!
Take a
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 02:17:24PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> Why are .rpmnew files created?
I just want to add an Me too to that question.
Very annoying to have to go and upgrade all of the config files by
hand!
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
msg63361/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
Daouda LO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some odd reasons, chfontpath didn't set mozilla-fontss:unscaled in
> /etc/X11/fs/config
Well, I first reported this problem in February and many times there after. Two
months later the final distribution arrives, with the same problem. Maybe you
can
"Mattias Dahlberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I'd really like to know why MandrakeSoft never did anything about the fixed
> font in KDE, nor the minimum font size in Konqueror.
I already posted about this issue and i already fixed it in mozilla-fonts 7mdk
For some odd reasons, chfont
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> we have already two dhcp client pump and dhpcd. what problems with
> dhcpcd ?
The problem with both pump and dhcpcd is that neither goes to any effort
to maintain the client's address across a "REBOOT". Th
19 matches
Mail list logo
