allot of the emails to the list have not been showing up for me. So I'm
testing my other email address to see if it works better.
--
New and improved with advanced outlook crash handler.
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Is this thing on? Tap, tap, tap.
I need my daily cooker fix.
--
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident."
-Arthur Schopenhaue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sorry. please ignore
- --
http://tblx.net/encrypt/[EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+d6RUsKWd3vub6wURAiF0AJ9gf1VL2iaeQavfkI20dcvxW3VLdwCdF3IR
EhLCWNJarCAxfDRMcxRvd3U=
=18lx
-END
Few things,
1. Standard GUI Install
- keyboard selection blank on the Summary Screen,
- Printer install does not allow for Network Printers (expert does). Maybe it
should?
2. Expert GUI Install
- keyboard selection does show up in Summary Screen,
- tried minimal install with X and Individu
Ok, that msg I sent 3 times is getting here with a "corrupted
pgp signed message" error...which is why it appears blank with
an attachment. I just tested with sending pgp signed emails to
other people and it's getting correctly to them, so...it either
was that pa
just testing to see if I got dropped or if cooker@ has gone missing.
Vox
--
Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs. Kind
of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_
technology than everyone else. -- Donald B. Marti Jr.
Does this mean that WPC11 got added/fixed in the pcmcia-cs config file ?
The pcmcia detection code has been synchronized with pcmcia-cs on
2002/08/29 (now, some cards are using yenta_socket but some
others still i82365); it's both in RC1 and RC2; since no one
reported a problem I suppose it works? -> people who can do a
pcmcia install (e.g. install from a pcmcia disk,
Nothing else to tell to ISteam :)
testing please ignore
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
On Thursdayen den 29 November 2001 11.59, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > > fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon.
> >
> > Ok, cool!
> >
> > > > 2. "Authorization Requests" hangs licq. Also I never get any
> > > > notifications that people sends these to me.
> > >
> > > Let me check that.
> >
> > I may
> > fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon.
>
> Ok, cool!
>
> > > 2. "Authorization Requests" hangs licq. Also I never get any
> > > notifications that people sends these to me.
> >
> > Let me check that.
>
> I may get notifications if I examine the "network window", I didn't check
> that.
Y
On Thursdayen den 29 November 2001 10.26, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:43:55PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint.
> > I have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go
> >
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:43:55PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint. I
> have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go
> online when started.
>
Probably temporary login problems but I see t
Update user/all users hangs Licq.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 8 hours 41 minutes
| cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan
Hi,
1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint. I
have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go
online when started.
2. "Authorization Requests" hangs licq. Also I never get any notifications
that people sends these to me.
--
-=-=-=-=-
> > That's probably not such a good idea yet, given the minimal support that
> > we have.
>
> Ok, got it.
>
> I have done some small test here against several buddies of mine, and direct
> messages do not work at all. I guess it's because one, or both parts is
> behind forewalls.
>
> Is there
On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 23.47, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems "licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk" do not propagate itself as v8...
> >
> > 16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq
> > v1.0.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems "licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk" do not propagate itself as v8...
>
> 16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq
> v1.0.4/SSL].
>
That's probably not such a good idea yet, given the minimal
Hi,
It seems "licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk" do not propagate itself as v8...
16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq
v1.0.4/SSL].
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake
>
> > (1) verify for the cooker version
> licq-1.0.4-0.5mdk.i586.rpm
>
> > (2) verify for the v8 version, if it's reproduceable, give me an an exact
> > test case, exactly as you type it (the aliases that you send to you can
> > subsitute something else, those shouldn't be too important.)
> licq
On Monday 26 November 2001 05:37, you wrote:
> Strange. Are you sure? All protocol stuff should be done within the Licq
> daemon, not the plugins.
OK, my bad. Reload V8, and console is working. Don't know what the
problem was last night
> > - URL sending still crashes client, otherwise
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:59:42AM -0600, J.P. Pasnak wrote:
> On Monday 26 November 2001 04:40, you wrote:
> > These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one
> > is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are
> > several core issues:
> >
> >
On Monday 26 November 2001 04:40, you wrote:
> These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one
> is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are
> several core issues:
>
> - interaction with the server
> - interaction with other clients
> - sta
Es schrieb Geoffrey Lee:
> These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8
> one is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that,
> there are several core issues:
>
> - interaction with the server
Since I use your RPMs I can communicate again via t
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 06.12, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > > Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server"
> > > don't work through my Li
On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 06.12, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server"
> > don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
>
> I think that there are still some direct connecti
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server" don't
> work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
>
I think that there are still some direct connection issues with Licq.
Unfortunately. :-(
- G.
On Sundayen den 25 November 2001 19.58, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> le dim 25-11-2001 à 17:23, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
> > Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server"
> > don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
>
> you open the right port ( 5190 ) ?
Everything is open LAN
le dim 25-11-2001 à 17:23, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
> Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server" don't
> work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
you open the right port ( 5190 ) ?
--
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html
-
C'est dans la marine qu'il y a le plus
Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server" don't
work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current u
On Friday 14 September 2001 16:32, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> Le Vendredi 14 Septembre 2001 16:17, Claudio scribit :
> > perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> > perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> > LANGUAGE = "it_IT:it",
> > LC_ALL = (unset),
> > LC_ME
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] testing LATEST cooker: disaster with locales I
suppose
System mirrored and installed 5 minutes ago...
X works fine now, but this is what I obtain running XFdrake and many
many
other application:
perl: warning: Settin
Le Vendredi 14 Septembre 2001 16:17, Claudio scribit :
> perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> LANGUAGE = "it_IT:it",
> LC_ALL = (unset),
> LC_MESSAGES = "it_IT@euro",
> LC_TIME = "it_IT@euro",
> LC_
System mirrored and installed 5 minutes ago...
X works fine now, but this is what I obtain running XFdrake and many many
other application:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = "it_IT:it",
LC_ALL = (unset),
Hi
I have a partition of 5 GB, originally intended for test of Woody, but their
mail list is so picky about style and expertice, so I will try ext3 and other
file system.
My problem is that I have a Mdk 8.0, within which I do rsync, that has an
fstab that mounts this test partition. This is
I have not seen anything from the list today, just testing it..
Jorg
Testing My apache server...
_
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
ACPI is still broken... Had to turn it off.
Well apart of some hangups with "aviplay", and probably due to its raw
alpha status, I have not seen any serious problems. I tested NFS, NCP
and SMB connections, kicking a few gigs in and out. Games work ok, both
OpenGL & SDL based. There seems to ex
My mail wasn't going through to cooker... this is a test of a change in my
config
--
-
Tim McKenzie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
testing sending to list.
> Allen Bolderoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a method of testing an ISO before burning?
>
> you can try (in root)
>
> cd Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/perl-install
> ./g_auto_install
>
> and do the fake install to the point of choosing packages. Don't be afraid of
> the diskdrake st
Thanks, That is what I wanted. :)
:wq
A
On 28 Apr 2000, Pixel wrote:
> Allen Bolderoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a method of testing an ISO before burning?
>
> you can try (in root)
>
> cd Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/perl-install
> ./g_auto_install
>
> and do the fake install
arrgh,
my stupidity (it was late, and I am tired)
I want to try an install off of the loop mounted iso.
how do I test the install process in order to test that the hdlists are not corrupt?
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 07:18:31PM +0200, diablero rambled a bit about:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 05:18:3
Allen Bolderoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a method of testing an ISO before burning?
you can try (in root)
cd Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/perl-install
./g_auto_install
and do the fake install to the point of choosing packages. Don't be afraid of
the diskdrake step, it won't touch the
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 05:18:33PM +0930, Allen Bolderoff wrote:
>
>
> Is there a method of testing an ISO before burning?
>
> I really want to be able to boot a loop mounted iso, and check that all the
> hdlists and depslists files all got created correctly, any Ideas?
Yes, you can use the l
Is there a method of testing an ISO before burning?
I really want to be able to boot a loop mounted iso, and check that all the
hdlists and depslists files all got created correctly, any Ideas?
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
>
> Ron Rosenthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd like to test the beta, but I can't find an iso image, which would
> > make downloading 7.0 a lot easier. Can youhelp?
>
> may i suggest you download the whole distribution and make your own
> iso images.
>
> si
- Original Message -
From: Ron Rosenthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 12:48 PM
Subject: [Cooker] Testing Beta
> Hi
>
> I'd like to test the beta, but I can't find an iso image, which would
> make down
Hi
I'd like to test the beta, but I can't find an iso image, which would
make downloading 7.0 a lot easier. Can youhelp?
Thanks.
Ron Rosenthal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a responsible user of e-mail for mass broadcasting, we filtered our e-mailing list
at OptList.com 24 hours before the transmission of this message. At which time, all
e-mail addresses registered at OptList.com with the preference to not receive
unsolicited e-mail were removed from our list.
51 matches
Mail list logo
