Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Mandrake doesn't use *any* official releases.
$ uname -r
2.2.17-21mdksecure
$ rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-2.1.3-16mdk
glibc-devel-2.1.3-16mdk
compat-glibc-5.3-2.0.7.9mdk
glibc-profile-2.1.3-16mdk
See those "-21mdksecure", "-16mdk",
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
?
You should do a little bit of packaging before saying such beepbeep.
But he's right! Aren't there patches made by Mandrake in these packages?
So it is not the original source anymore.
Alexander Skwar
--
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
?
You should do a little bit of packaging before saying such beepbeep.
But he's right! Aren't there patches made by Mandrake in these packages?
So it is not
On 13 Oct 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
2. Do you know any distribution where they provide original source
unpatched? There are simply not, the aim of a distribution is to
provide some fixed (e.g. working) versions of the sources!!!
Probably Slackware which is why I don't like that
Millions of electrons died to bring me this message. Was it worth it,
Guillaume Cottenceau?
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
?
You should do a little bit of packaging before saying such
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:13:49PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
?
You should do a little bit of packaging before saying such beepbeep.
But he's
Ok, I have asked several times about when they plan to release gcc-3.0 and
haven't got one single reply that might even look like an answer to that. From
that I assume that people simply dont know. Still, they are claiming that we
must get prepaired for it!
The fact that they don't have a clue
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I have asked several times about when they plan to release gcc-3.0 and
haven't got one single reply that might even look like an answer to that. From
that I assume that people simply dont know. Still, they are claiming that we
must get prepaired
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96.
To quote Guillaume Cottenceau:
"if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have to
find a solution, and it will not be to revert to 2.95 for sure."
Have you people at
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96.
To quote Guillaume Cottenceau:
"if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have to
find a solution, and it will not be
At 12 October, 2000 Pixel wrote:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96.
To quote Guillaume Cottenceau:
"if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96.
To quote Guillaume Cottenceau:
"if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96.
To quote Guillaume Cottenceau:
"if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have to
find a solution, and it will not be
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, you wrote:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96.
To quote Guillaume Cottenceau:
"if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have
to
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96.
To quote Guillaume Cottenceau:
"if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we
Millions of electrons died to bring me this message. Was it worth it,
Mattias Eriksson?
As I always have said, if you are just going to use it for cooker, and _never_
do a release using this snapshot (you can call it what ever, but it's not a
official gcc release), I have no problems at
16 matches
Mail list logo
