Joakim Bodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael Betz wrote:
Upgrading to the latest XFree4.2 packages left me without
an X display with my Matrox G200. System's coming up fine,
even the X Server is starting without any complains but
then it seems to just turn off the video signal and
Upgrading to the latest XFree4.2 packages left me without
an X display with my Matrox G200. System's coming up fine,
even the X Server is starting without any complains but
then it seems to just turn off the video signal and
my monitor goes into power save mode. All earlier
releases worked fine.
Michael Betz wrote:
Upgrading to the latest XFree4.2 packages left me without
an X display with my Matrox G200. System's coming up fine,
even the X Server is starting without any complains but
then it seems to just turn off the video signal and
my monitor goes into power save mode. All
System: Mdk 7.2 (gcc-2.95.2-12mdk), kernel 2.4.2-8mdk
I had to modify some *_dma.c of XFree 4.0.2-8mdk for successful compilation
(with agp support).
The patch is attached.
---
XFree86-4.0.2/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/gamma_dma.c.old
Fri Mar 9 17:36:01
System: Mdk 7.2 (gcc-2.95.2-12mdk), kernel 2.4.2-8mdk
I had to modify some *_dma.c of XFree 4.0.2-8mdk for successful compilation.
The patch is attached.
XFree86-4.0.2-dma_tqnext.patch.bz2
"Andrej Borsenkow" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrej Borsenkow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've read that to enable use of fonts antialising in KDE you need Qt
compiled with special patches. Is it correct? Does Qt in cooker include
these patches?
Nope , we remove them since
Andrej Borsenkow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've read that to enable use of fonts antialising in KDE you need Qt
compiled with special patches. Is it correct? Does Qt in cooker include
these patches?
Nope , we remove them since it's in alpha stage .
Andrej Borsenkow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've read that to enable use of fonts antialising in KDE you need Qt
compiled with special patches. Is it correct? Does Qt in cooker include
these patches?
Nope , we remove them since it's in alpha stage .
You mean to say that cooker is
XFree-4.0.2 doesn't run on my alpha. The last 4.0.1za versions worked
fine though. This is the output I'm getting when I run "startx".
The alpha (miata) has a 4Mb Matrox Millienium II card in it... The
problem probably lies in the mga_drv.o module (see the error messages
below):
Any idea's?
Franck Martin wrote:
I liked the system of Walnut, where you could subscribe for several years to
slackware or other CDs.
I think Mandrake should do that online, where you receive automatically the
new version of Mandrake in the post. Nothing Fancy just the CDs in an
envelope. For us
- Original Message -
From: "Salane" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.0.2
Not only that, with some patience and reading of ..oh what maybe
mandrakeuser.org one can download the rpms on
December 2000 09:55 am, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Salane" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.0.2
Not only that, with some patience and reading of ..oh what maybe
mandrakeuser.o
Wow, what a rush!
Some things need correction:
KDE 2.0.1 is on /Mandrake-devel/unsupported directory for 7.2
XFree-4.0.2 can be found (for 7.2) at
ftp://mandragon.org/pub/mandrake
And the latter is NOT from Mandrake directly but from a LM user named Eric
Guntermann.
Sometimes in these
civileme wrote:
XFree-4.0.2 can be found (for 7.2) at
ftp://mandragon.org/pub/mandrake
Not so. Here's what happens:
FTP Connection Failed
Description: Login incorrect.
Seems there is no anonymous ftp to this site.
--
Regards,
Ron. [AU]
Le Vendredi 22 Décembre 2000 20:59, vous avez écrit :
Not so. Here's what happens:
FTP Connection Failed
Description: Login incorrect.
Seems there is no anonymous ftp to this site.
The ftp is anonymous, it works, i mirrored everything, the server is just
very busy.
CU
Stef
--
The trick is to make it profitable, paying not only for its own
cost but for the dimunition of the revenue stream of people not buying
the
newest boxed sets because they already have the updates, but that is
more a
business and feasibility issue than a technical or moral one.
I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain
"interesting" packages from cooker to the release version if it meant I
could see them in say, maybe a month of release time. Why pay money?
To encourage speedy releases, and to benifit from the integration that
Mandrake does
Thursday 21 December 2000 08:19, ?? :
| I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain
| "interesting" packages from cooker to the release version if it meant I
| could see them in say, maybe a month of release time. Why pay money?
| To encourage speedy
Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 20 December 2000 22:04, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
We can't do everything.
This is FAR from everything...
You're welcomed to quit this mailing list and go somewhere where people
approach the infinity better
Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I'm not arguing about this. What I'm arguing about is that Mandrake seems to
"refuse" to release packages to the customers, while almost every other
distribution out there does this.
I'm not so sure that every
"David Foresman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
software like kde2.1, gnome 1.2, kernel 2.4, and xfree 4.0.2 should be
^^
Did someone tell you that it's not yet even *released* as a stable
version??
--
Guillaume Cottenceau -
Neal Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain
"interesting" packages from cooker to the release version if it meant I
could see them in say, maybe a month of release time. Why pay money? To
encourage speedy releases, and to benifit
D]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.0.2
Neal Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain
"interesting" packages from cooker to the release version if it meant I
could see them in say, maybe a month of release time. Why pay
On Thursday 21 December 2000 06:41, Mike Perry wrote:
I would certainly be ready to part with my hard earned shekels
for a service such as Neal is suggesting, however it would be
even better if such a service also included fixes for "non security"
bugs found after the product release, and not
Mike Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would certainly be ready to part with my hard earned shekels
for a service such as Neal is suggesting, however it would be
even better if such a service also included fixes for "non security"
bugs found after the product release, and not just more
Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I would be willing to pay a subscription fee just for the benefit of running
Cooker! Right now I feel guilty since I'm not financially supporting
Mandrake. Buying a copy in a local computer store supports the distributor
and the store a lot
Guillaume answered:
Neal Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain
"interesting" packages from cooker to the release version if it meant
I
could see them in say, maybe a month of release time. Why pay money?
To
encourage speedy
Thursday 21 December 2000 11:58, Guillaume Cottenceau ???:
| Neal Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain
|"interesting" packages from cooker to the release version if it meant I
|could see them in say, maybe a month of
Vadim Plessky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thursday 21 December 2000 11:58, Guillaume Cottenceau ???:
| Neal Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain
|"interesting" packages from cooker to the release version if it meant I
- Original Message -
From: "Vincent Danen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.0.2
On Wed Dec 20, 2000 at 11:47:16PM +0100, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
We do use MandrakeUpdate for securi
I might suggest a change in topic... Or perhaps a new mailing list for rants
such as this. For those of you that have problems upgrading your packages,
and especially for the ones that are starting to compare MandrakeSoft so a
certain large monopoly type "business" let me point out one simple
Thursday 21 December 2000 15:05, ?? :
| Vadim Plessky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
|| This is currently under question here at MandrakeSoft :-).
|
|I hope not for Cooker?
|Otherwise, it will be really hard to achieve *stability*
|What I like in Mandrake at a
On Thursday 21 December 2000 12:41, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 20 December 2000 22:04, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
We can't do everything.
This is FAR from everything...
You're welcomed to quit this
Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 21 December 2000 12:41, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 20 December 2000 22:04, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
We can't do everything.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McKenzie
I might suggest a change in topic... Or perhaps a new mailing
list for rants
such as this. For those of you that have problems upgrading your
packages,
and especially for the ones
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I would be willing to pay a subscription fee just for the benefit of running
Cooker! Right now I feel guilty since I'm not financially supporting
Mandrake. Buying a copy in a local computer store supports the
:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.0.2
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I would be willing to pay a subscription fee just for the benefit of
running
Cooker! Right now I feel guilty since I'm not financially supporting
Mandrake
Not only that, with some patience and reading of ..oh what maybe
mandrakeuser.org one can download the rpms one needs. I am on 7.2 with 4.0.2
and its working perfectly.
On Thursday 21 December 2000 06:53 am, you wrote:
Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Xfree 4.0.2
XFree 4.0.2 is out, will it be incorporated in cooker.
Paul Godin
"Godin, Paul" wrote:
XFree 4.0.2 is out, will it be incorporated in cooker.
Paul Godin
Too late! :) Its already there.
--
- Antony Suter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Examiner" openpgp:71ADFC87
- "...to condense fact from the vapor of nuance."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Godin, Paul") writes:
XFree 4.0.2 is out, will it be incorporated in cooker.
First, could you please configure your Outlook to not send HTML on
this list..
Second, XF 4.0.2 has been uploaded earlier today by Fred Lepied..
--
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft
Title: RE: [Cooker] Xfree 4.0.2
XFree 4.0.2 is out, will it be incorporated in cooker.
First, could you please configure your Outlook to not send HTML on
this list..
DONE
Second, XF 4.0.2 has been uploaded earlier today by Fred Lepied..
Already advised.
--
Frédéric Crozat
BTW, it may be a good idea to update the ATI and fb stuff from CVS. Keith
Packard made some hacks that allows the new Render extension to be run on ATI
Mach 64 cards, which are pretty popular. It had to happen right after 4.0.2
because of the freeze. This extension allows users to use
On Wednesday 20 December 2000 17:06, Godin, Paul wrote:
XFree 4.0.2 is out, will it be incorporated in cooker.
Paul Godin
What's up with Mandrake??? Why is EVERYTHING added to cooker and not to
normal updates? The use of MandrakeUpdate seems to be quite unnecessary
since Mandrake doesn't
- Original Message -
From: "Guillaume Cottenceau" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Godin, Paul" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.0.2
We can't do everything.
We d
Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's up with Mandrake??? Why is EVERYTHING added to cooker and not to
normal updates? The use of MandrakeUpdate seems to be quite unnecessary
since Mandrake doesn't add stuff to it.. Everything seems to be in
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed Dec 20, 2000 at 10:04:24PM +0100, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
We can't do everything.
We do use MandrakeUpdate for security updates. It already costs resources
because changing something means:
- doing it for a number of old
"Hoyt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Yes, it's a lot of work, but it gives the impression that you don't
support your product in the way a consumer understands support. It's
also an argument for not having so many point releases and further
illustrates that Linux is really still in
On Wed Dec 20, 2000 at 11:47:16PM +0100, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
We do use MandrakeUpdate for security updates. It already costs resources
because changing something means:
- doing it for a number of old distribs (7.2, 7.1, 7.0, 6.1)
Don't forget 6.0... we still support it
On Wednesday 20 December 2000 22:04, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
We can't do everything.
This is FAR from everything...
We do use MandrakeUpdate for security updates. It already costs resources
because changing something means:
- doing it for a number of old distribs (7.2, 7.1, 7.0, 6.1)
On Wednesday 20 December 2000 22:53, you wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2000 22:04, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
We can't do everything.
This is FAR from everything...
We do use MandrakeUpdate for security updates. It already costs resources
because changing something means:
- doing
On Thursday 21 December 2000 05:34, Ed Wilts wrote:
In my opinion, they have thought about it. Now it's time for YOU to think
about it. A Mandrake Linux release is a tested, integrated release.
You're making the silly assumption that each package is totally
independent, and this is
Message -
From: "Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Guillaume Cottenceau" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Godin, Paul" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.0.2
On We
53 matches
Mail list logo
