Re: [Cooker] everybuddy and ayttm

2003-01-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 02:48, David Walser wrote: > Is there any reason we need everybuddy or ayttm in > main when we have Gaim and Kopete? Not to mention seven thousand different ICQ clients. But yes there is: some people use it. :) -- adamw

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy and ayttm

2003-01-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 04:55, Ben Reser wrote: > Part of the issue too is that IM clients under Linux have had a history > of being broken. If Protocol A is broken on one client it may work on > another better. Support for various protocols and their functionality > differs greatly between progra

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy and ayttm

2003-01-30 Thread Ben Reser
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:48:37PM -0800, David Walser wrote: > Is there any reason we need everybuddy or ayttm in > main when we have Gaim and Kopete? Well this is how I see the situation... gaim, everybuddy and ayttm is gnome. kopete is KDE. Kopete and everybuddy/ayttm are well integrated IM cl

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy and ayttm

2003-01-30 Thread David Walser
Is there any reason we need everybuddy or ayttm in main when we have Gaim and Kopete? --- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > everybuddy in it's current state isn't really ben > maintained at current. > The developers are off essentially rewriting the > source from scratch. > It's really buggy

[Cooker] everybuddy and ayttm

2003-01-30 Thread Ben Reser
everybuddy in it's current state isn't really ben maintained at current. The developers are off essentially rewriting the source from scratch. It's really buggy and we've been forced to release CVS versions just to fix the seriousness of the bugs. On December 20th, one of the everybuddy developers

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy-0.4.3-3.20021017.1mdk

2002-11-04 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 18:50, Igor Izyumin wrote: > On Sunday 03 November 2002 08:30 pm, Ben Reser wrote: > > There are a number of issues with the version currently in cooker and > > shipped with 9.0. Many people have experienced lots of crashes with it. > > Apparently the MSN module doesn't work

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy-0.4.3-3.20021017.1mdk

2002-11-03 Thread Igor Izyumin
On Sunday 03 November 2002 08:30 pm, Ben Reser wrote: > There are a number of issues with the version currently in cooker and > shipped with 9.0. Many people have experienced lots of crashes with it. > Apparently the MSN module doesn't work because of a bug in the > everybuddy build with gcc3. Th

[Cooker] everybuddy-0.4.3-3.20021017.1mdk

2002-11-03 Thread Ben Reser
There are a number of issues with the version currently in cooker and shipped with 9.0. Many people have experienced lots of crashes with it. Apparently the MSN module doesn't work because of a bug in the everybuddy build with gcc3. The Yahoo module has bugs in it that can cause the entire app to

Re: [Cooker] Everybuddy MSN support

2002-11-03 Thread Ben Reser
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 04:32:22PM -0600, Igor Izyumin wrote: > Not on my 9.0 at least - MSN is not in the choices. How do you activate it? > Is it a separate RPM? > $ rpm -q everybuddy > everybuddy-0.4.2-2mdk Okay the module is there... it just won't load because it's missing a link... http://

Re: [Cooker] Everybuddy MSN support

2002-11-03 Thread Ben Reser
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:34:18PM -0600, Igor Izyumin wrote: > Can someone explain why everybuddy in Mandrake 9.0 doesn't have MSN support > compiled in while the one in 8.2 does? Umm 9.0 does have MSN support compiled in. -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "If you're not

[Cooker] Everybuddy MSN support

2002-11-03 Thread Igor Izyumin
Can someone explain why everybuddy in Mandrake 9.0 doesn't have MSN support compiled in while the one in 8.2 does? -- -- Igor

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-10-01 Thread Ben Reser
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 06:13:50AM +1000, Ron Stodden wrote: > Downloads from MandrakeClub seem to be available to the public. Explore > your mirror and you should find the 'unsupported - MandrakeClub' directory. Yeah but he can't vote and I was saying that I'd put it on the club if enough peop

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-10-01 Thread Ron Stodden
Brook Humphrey wrote: > Thanks but unfortunately for people like me I'm not a member. Downloads from MandrakeClub seem to be available to the public. Explore your mirror and you should find the 'unsupported - MandrakeClub' directory. -- Ron. [Melbourne, Australia] IMPORTANT! troels...

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-10-01 Thread Brook Humphrey
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 10:54 am, Ben Reser wrote: > > Note that I said lots. Not everyone was having problems with it. I was > using 0.4.2 on a daily basis until I moved to 0.4.3 with no problems. > It doesn't really matter now. It's history. 0.4.2 shipped. Now the > best we can do is con

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-10-01 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 07:21:42AM -0700, Brook Humphrey wrote: > On Monday 30 September 2002 10:24 pm, Ben Reser wrote: > > It's not segfaulting for everyone. I actually wasn't having problems > > with 0.4.2. I just keep upgrading because well it keeps getting more > > stable. But I don't thin

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-10-01 Thread Brook Humphrey
On Monday 30 September 2002 10:24 pm, Ben Reser wrote: > It's not segfaulting for everyone. I actually wasn't having problems > with 0.4.2. I just keep upgrading because well it keeps getting more > stable. But I don't think anyone really reported lots of problems with > 0.4.3 till well like ri

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-10-01 Thread Quel Qun
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 00:51, Digital Wokan wrote: > For all the things Mandrake got right, I can't believe they'd freeze a > segfaulting everybuddy instead of allowing in a newer version that actually > works. I realize it's not a critical piece of software, so I'll try to make > this comparis

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-09-30 Thread Ben Reser
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:51:06AM -0700, Digital Wokan wrote: > For all the things Mandrake got right, I can't believe they'd freeze a > segfaulting everybuddy instead of allowing in a newer version that actually > works. I realize it's not a critical piece of software, so I'll try to make >

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-09-30 Thread Digital Wokan
For all the things Mandrake got right, I can't believe they'd freeze a segfaulting everybuddy instead of allowing in a newer version that actually works. I realize it's not a critical piece of software, so I'll try to make this comparison relavent... It's like Ford putting out a car without pu

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-09-30 Thread Quel Qun
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 15:02, Ben Reser wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 07:54:42PM -0700, Quel Qun wrote: > > everybuddy segfaults as soon as I try to add a new account. > > > > Step to reproduce: > > > > 1. rm -f ~/.everybuddy > > 2. start everybuddy, it brings the account dialog. > > 3. add an

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-09-30 Thread Ben Reser
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 07:54:42PM -0700, Quel Qun wrote: > everybuddy segfaults as soon as I try to add a new account. > > Step to reproduce: > > 1. rm -f ~/.everybuddy > 2. start everybuddy, it brings the account dialog. > 3. add an account and click ok > 4. segmentation fault. > > In fact th

[Cooker] everybuddy segfaults

2002-09-29 Thread Quel Qun
Hi, everybuddy segfaults as soon as I try to add a new account. Step to reproduce: 1. rm -f ~/.everybuddy 2. start everybuddy, it brings the account dialog. 3. add an account and click ok 4. segmentation fault. In fact the account file only contains something like: =o= kk1 signature.asc

[Cooker] everybuddy-0.4.3-3mdk

2002-09-09 Thread Ben Reser
I know we're in a freeze but I figured people might like this. However, soundwrapper probably should be set to be used from the menu for 9.0 and the description probably should be updated like I did. If it can make it into 9.0 I'll be happy to put together a 0.4.2 with just those changes. At an

Re: [Cooker] Everybuddy error

2002-08-14 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:06:44PM -0400, Rubin Bennett wrote: > I fired up Everybuddy, added an account, and it immediately segfaulted > (see below). > > However (!) I copied my .everybuddy directory from another system and it > works fine- the issue is in the creation of a new .everybuddy direc

[Cooker] Everybuddy error

2002-08-13 Thread Rubin Bennett
Howdy, all I fired up Everybuddy, added an account, and it immediately segfaulted (see below). However (!) I copied my .everybuddy directory from another system and it works fine- the issue is in the creation of a new .everybuddy directory. Thanks! Rubin Session Below: Using esd sound Cant o

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy missing BuildRequires

2002-06-08 Thread Ben Reser
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 05:14:02PM +1000, Geoffrey Lee wrote: > better if it were libltdl-devel, because the so major may change. Yeah guess I was being overzealous there by including the major... -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org We tend to see all wars through the lens of

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy missing BuildRequires

2002-06-08 Thread Geoffrey Lee
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 12:10:41AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > everybuddy needs to have libltdl3-devel as a BuildRequires. > better if it were libltdl-devel, because the so major may change. -- Geoff.

[Cooker] everybuddy missing BuildRequires

2002-06-07 Thread Ben Reser
everybuddy needs to have libltdl3-devel as a BuildRequires. -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org We tend to see all wars through the lens of the current conflict, and we mine history for lessons convenient to the present purpose. - Brian Hayes

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy 0.4.2-1mdk has no/broken MSN module

2002-06-04 Thread Lenny Cartier
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 03:23:13PM +0100, Toby Inkster wrote: > > 1. Use GCC 2.9x to compile Everybuddy; or > 2. Upgrade to a more recent version -- either the CVS version or 0.4.3 which > should be out in a few days I think. > > I've got a recent CVS RPM available here: > http://www.goddamn.co

Re: [Cooker] everybuddy 0.4.2-1mdk has no/broken MSN module

2002-06-03 Thread Steve Howes
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 18:49:16 +0100 Steve Howes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just installed latest everybuddy from cooker but the MSN module > appears broken. Just to update the msn2.la module exists in the /usr/share/everybuddy/modules directory but is not recognised by everybuddy. In the mod

[Cooker] everybuddy 0.4.2-1mdk has no/broken MSN module

2002-06-03 Thread Steve Howes
Just installed latest everybuddy from cooker but the MSN module appears broken. Cheers, Steve

[Cooker] everybuddy

2001-07-18 Thread Blue Lizard
-=[ EVERYBUDDY: http://www.everybuddy.com ]=- Version 0.3.0 * improved MSN Mime support (Bertrand Mathieu) * aRts sound support added (Sebastian Held) * Fixed a major Lockup problem * better theme support * BSD Fixes added (thanks to Todd Cohen) * F

[Cooker] everybuddy-2.1beta6

2001-07-02 Thread Blue Lizard
4th day 3rd try, nameserver times out everytime i try to send this. old news now but everybuddy-2.1beta6 is out

Re: [Cooker] Everybuddy-0.1.4

2000-09-04 Thread John Johnson
I must have an error in my spec file.. I will look into it this week. -John - Original Message - From: Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cooker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 12:20 AM Subject: [Cooker] Everybuddy-0.1.4 > The default sounds ar

[Cooker] Everybuddy-0.1.4

2000-09-04 Thread Steve Fox
The default sounds aren't in the RPM...was that intentional? -- Steve Fox http://k-lug.com