[Cooker] gftp-2.0.15 serious bug

2003-08-27 Thread Sefer Tov
Hi! Since I updated to gftp-2.0.15 it has stopped connecting to other sites (I use passive mode due to set up fireall) and reports insistingly the following error (this happened to me on both my Linux machines). 230 Anonymous user logged in SYST 215 UNIX Type: L8 TYPE I 200 TYPE is now 8-bit bi

Re: [Cooker] gftp-gtk and galaxy theme

2003-07-19 Thread Thierry Vignaud
"Sefer Tov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems like a recent change in the Galaxy theme causes gftp-gtk to > break. This is constantly reproduceable on my Linux (x86) > box. Whenever I go to gftp's "Edit Bookmarks" menu, I get a floating > point exception. Running it under gdb didn't produce

[Cooker] gftp-gtk and galaxy theme

2003-07-19 Thread Sefer Tov
Hi! It seems like a recent change in the Galaxy theme causes gftp-gtk to break. This is constantly reproduceable on my Linux (x86) box. Whenever I go to gftp's "Edit Bookmarks" menu, I get a floating point exception. Running it under gdb didn't produce much meaningful results other than this: P

Re: [Cooker] gftp requirements

2003-02-20 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Crispin Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > gftp is built with GTK2, but says it requires GTK1.2 - can this be > changed? fixing in progress ...

[Cooker] gftp requirements

2003-02-19 Thread Crispin Boylan
hi gftp is built with GTK2, but says it requires GTK1.2 - can this be changed? Cheers cris.

[Cooker] Gftp

2002-08-27 Thread Crispin Boylan
Hi can the GFTP 2.0.13 in Mandrake be recompiled as a gtk 2 app? It already builds and runs cleanly with the --enable-gtk20 option at configure, and it looks so much nicer :0 Cheers cris.

Re: [Cooker] gFTP Bug - causes crash

2002-08-20 Thread Ryan
If I recall correctly I did send it to the author, but I could be wrong (ive slept since then). Ill look at the code as soon as I get a chance... which I dont forsee happening until this weekend but you never know. The cause of the problem is that when you remove the files it tries to lock the

Re: [Cooker] gFTP Bug - causes crash

2002-08-20 Thread Geoffrey Lee
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:40:29PM -0600, Ryan wrote: > This is a known bug that has been in gFTP for ages. It is due to some > mutex locking issues with threads. I worked on this a while back and had a > patch made, im not sure if this patch is still included in the cooker > version, furthermo

Re: [Cooker] gFTP Bug - causes crash

2002-08-20 Thread newslett
Mandrake: Will this be fixed by 9.0 Final?? Cheers, Jason Ryan wrote: > This is a known bug that has been in gFTP for ages. It is due to some > mutex locking issues with threads. I worked on this a while back and had a > patch made, im not sure if this patch is still included in the cooker >

Re: [Cooker] gFTP Bug - causes crash

2002-08-20 Thread Ryan
This is a known bug that has been in gFTP for ages. It is due to some mutex locking issues with threads. I worked on this a while back and had a patch made, im not sure if this patch is still included in the cooker version, furthermore Im not 100% sure if the patch works, but it worked well in

[Cooker] gFTP Bug - causes crash

2002-08-20 Thread newslett
I have encountered a repeatable bug in gFTP. If you have a list of files set for download and you are in the middle of downloading those files, if you try and remove files from the list to be downloaded it crashes the program. Well, it actually freezes the program and it must be xkilled. It

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-11 Thread Ryan
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Han wrote: > All I did was bzipping his patch. Making it ready for prime-time :) > > > Groetjes, Han. > I tarred + bzipped the patch and it always complained about "Patch ended in middle of a line". Guess I didnt need to tar it :) Ryan

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-11 Thread Han
Geoffrey Lee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:39:40AM +0100, Han wrote: > > http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/gftp-2.0.11-2mdk.src.rpm > > Oh nevermind ... I've already uploaded the new one with Ryan's patch > this afternoon ... All I did was bzipping his patch. Making i

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-11 Thread Geoffrey Lee
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:39:40AM +0100, Han wrote: > Geoffrey Lee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 01:10:24PM +0100, Han wrote: > > > Ryan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Okay, enough bable. Download the new srpm from: > > > > http://icemaann.magenet.com/files/gftp-2.0.1

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-11 Thread Han
Geoffrey Lee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 01:10:24PM +0100, Han wrote: > > Ryan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Okay, enough bable. Download the new srpm from: > > > http://icemaann.magenet.com/files/gftp-2.0.11-1mdk.src.rpm > > > > Groovy. Wouldn't it be nice if you show

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-10 Thread Geoffrey Lee
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:29:54PM -0700, Ryan wrote: > A proper fix/patch has been done. Files at: > http://icemaann.magenet.com/files > > Sorry, I was waiting for han to say if I made the new rpm correctly, but a > new one is at the above location. A bug report (with patch) has been sent > to t

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-10 Thread Ryan
A proper fix/patch has been done. Files at: http://icemaann.magenet.com/files Sorry, I was waiting for han to say if I made the new rpm correctly, but a new one is at the above location. A bug report (with patch) has been sent to the author. Ryan

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-10 Thread Geoffrey Lee
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:57:03PM +1300, anonymous wrote: > > I am reporting a bug that has been present in the last few versions of > gFTP. When a selection of files has been made for download and the > download has begun, you cannot remove more than about 5-6 (sometimes > trying to remove

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-10 Thread Geoffrey Lee
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 01:10:24PM +0100, Han wrote: > Ryan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Okay, enough bable. Download the new srpm from: > > http://icemaann.magenet.com/files/gftp-2.0.11-1mdk.src.rpm > > Groovy. Wouldn't it be nice if you showed the patch in this message? > This is a bit like w

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-10 Thread Ryan
Sorry there guys. I admittedly do not know the "standard" procedure for this list, as Im just getting involved. Thanks for the advice. Im continuing to work on it (although I got up late), and I will try to make a proper patch next time :) Ryan

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-10 Thread Han
Ryan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Okay, enough bable. Download the new srpm from: > http://icemaann.magenet.com/files/gftp-2.0.11-1mdk.src.rpm Groovy. Wouldn't it be nice if you showed the patch in this message? This is a bit like walking in the dark. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~ha

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-09 Thread Ryan
I have the problem in the 2.0.11 release. I have, however, fixed the error (well, I put it through 5 minutes of testing which previously caused the lockup everytime). Please note that I am still working on this, and there are actually 2 ways to fix this, I am still deciding on which on is the best

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-09 Thread Han
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Would seem so as it's not a problem in the latest release. I used the latest release. What do you mean? Btw if you don't want to quote then please remove the old text. Its of no use. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-09 Thread newslett
Would seem so as it's not a problem in the latest release. Han wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Was not my intention to be mean so I'm sorry if it seemed so. I knowdevelopers put in a staggering amount of time into app development,most times with

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-09 Thread Han
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Was not my intention to be mean so I'm sorry if it seemed so. I know > developers put in a staggering amount of time into app development, > most times without even a thank you for their trouble. I appreciate > ALL work being done on Linux and Open

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-09 Thread newslett
Was not my intention to be mean so I'm sorry if it seemed so.  I know developers put in a staggering amount of time into app development, most times without even a thank you for their trouble.  I appreciate ALL work being done on Linux and Open Source in General but as I said, some developers wa

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-09 Thread OS
Please don't be to mean about this man ! He has responded to bugs I submitted in previous versions, but said at the time that, like all of us no doubt, he was trying to juggle 1001 things and gFTP didn't always get the time he would like. Owen On Monday 07 Jan 2002 11:23 am, you wrote: > Tha

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-07 Thread anonymous
Thanks and I agree with you and usually send bug reports to the app developer but my experience with gFTP's developer regarding bugs has not been good.  He seems not to want to hear about them so I just stopped sending them direct, preferring to go through the cooker teamwho of course are AL

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-06 Thread Yura Gusev
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, anonymous wrote: > Totally concur. Have been using it for a while and it is a GREAT client > but it does have a few bugs which seem to persist version after version. > I didn't pay for it so I aint' complaining! If I knew how to write > code I'd fix it myself, as I don't, I

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-06 Thread anonymous
Totally concur. Have been using it for a while and it is a GREAT client but it does have a few bugs which seem to persist version after version. I didn't pay for it so I aint' complaining! If I knew how to write code I'd fix it myself, as I don't, I keep my mouth shut for the most part (exc

Re: [Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-06 Thread George Mitchell
anonymous wrote: > > I am reporting a bug that has been present in the last few versions of > gFTP. When a selection of files has been made for download and the > download has begun, you cannot remove more than about 5-6 (sometimes > trying to remove 1 is enough to lock it up) of those files

[Cooker] gFTP 2.0.11 bug

2002-01-06 Thread anonymous
I am reporting a bug that has been present in the last few versions of gFTP. When a selection of files has been made for download and the download has begun, you cannot remove more than about 5-6 (sometimes trying to remove 1 is enough to lock it up) of those files from the download list wit

Re: [Cooker] gFTP

2002-01-01 Thread anonymous
iles and directories that you are comparing. I had a consistant crash because of that. I don't think gftp can handle a large number of files. -DaveOn Tuesday 01 January 2002 09:01, you wrote: With the latest Cooker, gFTP crashes when doing a directory compare,then trying to delete file

Re: [Cooker] gFTP

2002-01-01 Thread Dave Seff
What is the number of files and directories that you are comparing. I had a consistant crash because of that. I don't think gftp can handle a large number of files. -Dave On Tuesday 01 January 2002 09:01, you wrote: > With the latest Cooker, gFTP crashes when doing a directory

Re: [Cooker] gFTP

2002-01-01 Thread anonymous
With the latest Cooker, gFTP crashes when doing a directory compare, then trying to delete files in the left (local) pane. Also, mandrake control center doesn't run at all. I think it might be something to do with the updated QT libraries Anyone else having problems?? Cheers, Jason

Re: [Cooker] gftp has no url to Mandrake

2001-09-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The subject is the media. > > regards > guran you should CC to maintainer [gc@bi ~] rpmmon -p gftp rchaillat -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] gftp has no url to Mandrake

2001-09-08 Thread guran
The subject is the media. regards guran -- Mandrake Linux 8.1 beta Cooker kernel-2.4.8.21 vers:1.569

Re: [Cooker] gftp-2.0.8pre2-1mdk

2001-03-20 Thread Eric MC D
linux-mandrake /incoming as src file to compile with added spec file. Eric MC On Monday 19 March 2001 16:21, you wrote: | On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Roger wrote: | | { Eric MC D wrote: | { > | { > Uploaded latest gftp package as src.rpm | { > | { > Name: gftp Relocation

Re: [Cooker] gftp-2.0.8pre2-1mdk

2001-03-19 Thread Denis Pelletier
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Roger wrote: { Eric MC D wrote: { > { > Uploaded latest gftp package as src.rpm { > { > Name: gftp Relocations: /usr { > Version : 2.0.8pre2Vendor: MandrakeSoft { > Release : 1mdk Build Date: Sat Mar

Re: [Cooker] gftp-2.0.8pre2-1mdk

2001-03-18 Thread Roger
Eric MC D wrote: > > Uploaded latest gftp package as src.rpm > > Name: gftp Relocations: /usr > Version : 2.0.8pre2Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 1mdk Build Date: Sat Mar 17 14:49:43 2001 > Install date: Sat Mar 17 14:

[Cooker] gftp-2.0.8pre2-1mdk

2001-03-17 Thread Eric MC D
Uploaded latest gftp package as src.rpm Name: gftp Relocations: /usr Version : 2.0.8pre2Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Sat Mar 17 14:49:43 2001 Install date: Sat Mar 17 14:53:50 2001 Group :

Re: [Cooker] gFTP ??!?!

2000-07-12 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
OS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > What has happened to gFTP ?! > > It is all over the place ! So far I have found : > > Resume a stopped download - Select the file and press <--, select Resume and > press Okay: Nothing happens. Select the file again and press <-- : gFTP crashes > !

[Cooker] gFTP ??!?!

2000-07-11 Thread OS
Hello, What has happened to gFTP ?! It is all over the place ! So far I have found : Resume a stopped download - Select the file and press <--, select Resume and press Okay: Nothing happens. Select the file again and press <-- : gFTP crashes ! Select a batch of files to download from a site an

[Cooker] GFTP

1999-10-13 Thread Alessandro Sangiuliano
I'm the only one user that have problems with gftp? >From a version to another I always get crashes. The first way to obtain a crash is by clicking on some function while gftp is getting the remote directory tree. IglooFTP free ( 0.6.1 alpha ) have strange problems with some remote symlinks e.g.