On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Don Head wrote:
[...]
I have no clue how many patches they've applied
to however many pieces of software they have in
the distro. You think they're afraid to patch
gcc? NO! They'll add patch after patch, and
even move to 2.97 if needed. They will make sure
that the
At 11 October, 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does this means that you are not going to release another stable release of
Mandrake before gcc-3.0 is released? Or does it mean that you are kicking the
gcc developers in the groin and release the
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
It mean we going to take a highly patched/fixed/modified version of gcc2.96 if
gcc3.0 is not ready, we going to usethe save version that the leader
has, period.
OK, so what you are saying is that by introducing gcc-2.96 you are
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, you wrote:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
It mean we going to take a highly patched/fixed/modified version of
gcc2.96 if gcc3.0 is not ready, we going to usethe save version that
the leader has, period.
OK, so what you are saying is that by
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, you wrote:
At 11 October, 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does this means that you are not going to release another stable
release of Mandrake before gcc-3.0 is released? Or does it mean that
you are kicking the gcc
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Mattias Eriksson wrote:
I cant see what cooker and in the long run Mandrake would gain from this. What
I can see is that alot of people that is just running some packages from
cooker, while still prefering to use stable core libs cant continue to use any
cooker software.
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I cant see what cooker and in the long run Mandrake would gain from this. What
I can see is that alot of people that is just running some packages from
cooker, while still prefering to use stable core libs cant continue to use any
cooker software.
At 11 October, 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I cant see what cooker and in the long run Mandrake would gain from this. What
I can see is that alot of people that is just running some packages from
cooker, while still prefering to use stable core
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, you wrote:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I cant see what cooker and in the long run Mandrake would gain from this.
What I can see is that alot of people that is just running some packages
from cooker, while still prefering to use stable core libs cant
At 11 October, 2000 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
OK, so what you are saying is that by introducing gcc-2.96 you are prepaired to
do the same thing as RedHat and release a gcc snapshot as the stable compiler
in a Mandrake release against the recomendations from the gcc developers.
No,
At 11 October, 2000 Jason Straight wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, you wrote:
At 11 October, 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does this means that you are not going to release another stable
release of Mandrake before gcc-3.0 is released? Or does
Mattias Eriksson wrote:
In what way will it be better prepaired for gcc3?
gcc3.0 have a lot of parts redesigned and rewritten. Block reordering
optimisation and other stuff. It will be all this gcc code that will be
thoroughly tested by having it in cooker as soon as possible.
I can accept
But would they release a Mandrake with a
unstable kernel? He said that if gcc3 is not
released, Mandrake will release a unstable gcc
for the next release. Since I dont know the
roadmap for gcc3 I don't know how big this risk
is. Does anyone know about when they plan to
release gcc3? If
Don Head wrote:
But would they release a Mandrake with a
unstable kernel? He said that if gcc3 is not
released, Mandrake will release a unstable gcc
for the next release. Since I dont know the
roadmap for gcc3 I don't know how big this risk
is. Does anyone know about when they plan
So, as for me, the biggest problem is "will it break a lot of things" against
"will it fix a lot of things". A thing that would be nice would -O3 -mpentiumpro
that works on C++ (gcc-2.95.2 has pb with this)
Last thing, if perl/ruby/ocaml/emacs works, i don't give a damn what the poor C
15 matches
Mail list logo
