söndagen den 9 november 2003 01.18 skrev Oden Eriksson:
lördagen den 8 november 2003 23.56 skrev Olivier Blin:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:12:01 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi (Olivier Blin)
Is there a reason why aic7xxx is not compiled and provided with this
package?
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 01:23:35 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing. I noticed ivp6 was loaded per default, why is that?
Hum, you're right, I don't know why, perhaps a wrong module dependency.
Also none of my sound modules was loaded at boot, I had to manually
modprobe
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 02:50:46 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 01:23:35 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing. I noticed ivp6 was loaded per default, why is that?
Hum, you're right, I don't know why, perhaps a wrong module
dependency.
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Olivier Blin wrote:
Wow. I eat my words.
Test9.4mdk kicks ass. All modules load (alsa, firewire, USB, video,
even joystick!!!) This is very cool.
thanks to svetljo, he told me how to fix it
Responsiveness is insane. Like even my mouse cursor moves faster. Is
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Any news about the 23mdk panic?
Sorry, we tried many configurations to no avail. :-( i.e. it still works.
Among others things, tried with an xfs /boot, reiserfs /, ext3 /home, it
works. Tried a 2 disks configuration: first disk with some ntfs garbage,
Tim Sawchuck wrote:
[..]
I have something going on with sound from xmms playing oggs, but I am not
sure it is the 2.6 kernel. I have it with the 2.4 kernel, but rarely, and
seems more frequent with 2.6. I seem to notice a chopping or clipping or
skips, but there is no pattern I can find.
Have
Jure Repinc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
k Quel Qun wrote:
reiserfs seems to be borked.
I also get kernel panic with harddrive which has 3 partitions on it:
swap, ext3 and ntfs. So it is not just reiserfs. Worked just fine with
-19mdk kernel.
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 00:07:19 -0500
Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 00:02, Olivier Blin wrote:
Your problem has been reported here :
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09733.html
Enh... probably best to let them fix it. There
On 11/05/2003 09:08:19 AM, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
Have you considered this?
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg129204.html
GNOME users need not worry about this oddity.
Or about arts (huge sigh of relief).
Austin
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:08:19 -0800
Rolf Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
Tim Sawchuck wrote:
[..]
I have something going on with sound from xmms playing oggs, but I am
not sure it is the 2.6 kernel. I have it with the 2.4 kernel, but
rarely, and seems more
I have tried kernel-2.4.22.24mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
on a PC with IDE ext3 root partition.
I get this error from mount:
hda5: bad access: block=2, count=2
then I get bad superblock and more errors.
I use a ram disk, as I have a SCSI CD writer.
On another PC with a SCSI HD I also get
a mount error of a
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 05:14, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Any news about the 23mdk panic?
Sorry, we tried many configurations to no avail. :-( i.e. it still works.
Among others things, tried with an xfs /boot, reiserfs /, ext3 /home, it
works.
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 08:49, Tim Sawchuck wrote:
There is more power in your music than you know - is this the music hath
charms to sooth a savage beast thing going here?!?!?
Since I'm on a correcting-colloquialisms kick on this list...:)
That's a misquote. The original is: Music hath charms
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 23:38:30 +
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 08:49, Tim Sawchuck wrote:
There is more power in your music than you know - is this the music
hath charms to sooth a savage beast thing going here?!?!?
Since I'm
This is not necessary, methinks. Is this an issue in urpmi or
kernel-source?
--
Brad Felmey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uncompensated Mandrake Beta Testers, Inc.
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 20:33, Brad Felmey wrote:
This is not necessary, methinks. Is this an issue in urpmi or
kernel-source?
kernel-source need libncurses-devel
libncurses requires libgpm1-devel .
--
Michaël Scherer
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 13:33, Brad Felmey wrote:
This is not necessary, methinks. Is this an issue in urpmi or
kernel-source?
And requires libncurses5-devel?
--
Brad Felmey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uncompensated Mandrake Beta Testers, Inc.
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 20:38, Brad Felmey wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 13:33, Brad Felmey wrote:
This is not necessary, methinks. Is this an issue in urpmi or
kernel-source?
And requires libncurses5-devel?
yes, for make menuconfig.
In a perfect world, it should be possible to have one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Scherer wrote:
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 20:38, Brad Felmey wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 13:33, Brad Felmey wrote:
This is not necessary, methinks. Is this an issue in urpmi or
kernel-source?
And requires libncurses5-devel?
yes, for
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 13:58, Buchan Milne wrote:
I see why libncurses5-devel is necessary to build a kernel
I don't. Why not require X so xconfig works? 'make config' will work
with nothing but a shell and source. Everything else is optional.
--
Brad Felmey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uncompensated
Any news about the 23mdk panic?
I tried again with the same result.
I noted
Loading jdb.o
Loading ext3.o
before the mount error 6.
-- Bjarne
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 08:54, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
I forgot to mention that I tried the
kernel-enterprise-2.4.22.23mdk
kernel. All enterprise kernels
I have the same problem with 23mdk, and the last tmb kernel.
Doesn't work with reiserfs... kernel panic, can't find init.
Works fine with XFS or ext3.
Austin
I have the same problem with 23mdk, and the last tmb kernel.
Doesn't work with reiserfs... kernel panic, can't find init.
Works fine with XFS or ext3.
Austin
Hum, try 2.6 :)
It must have all the features you need, except bootsplash ;)
--
Olivier Blin
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 18:32, Olivier Blin wrote:
Hum, try 2.6 :)
It must have all the features you need, except bootsplash ;)
Yeah, I've been playing with the cooker version a lot, but alsa seems
sketchy. It doesn't inert properly by default, and the mixer settings
seem to be screwed up. Some
Yeah, I've been playing with the cooker version a lot, but alsa seems
sketchy. It doesn't inert properly by default, and the mixer settings
seem to be screwed up. Some other modules don't insert by default any
more.
I've fixed many things since -test5, alsa should load fine now.
Please can
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 20:20, Olivier Blin wrote:
I've fixed many things since -test5, alsa should load fine now.
Please can you tell me the name of the modules that don't insert ?
And please report others bugs I should be aware of :)
Wow. I eat my words.
Test9.4mdk kicks ass. All modules
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 17:20, Olivier Blin wrote:
Yeah, I've been playing with the cooker version a lot, but alsa seems
sketchy. It doesn't inert properly by default, and the mixer settings
seem to be screwed up. Some other modules don't insert by default any
more.
I've fixed many
First of all, unlimited thanks for this package.
no problem, the real work is done by kernel developpers :)
Test9 has been running (with nvidia patched) since this morning
without any trouble, but the load has been reasonably light.
One thing I noticed that has nothing to do with the kernel
OH! I take it all back...
I just spent a whopping 20 minutes writing a song about how cool 2.6 is,
and then I went to record it, and my bloody audio interface won't work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] austin]# tail /var/log/messages
Nov 4 21:11:15 gamma373-179 kernel: hub 1-0:1.0: new USB device on port
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 18:09, Olivier Blin wrote:
First of all, unlimited thanks for this package.
no problem, the real work is done by kernel developpers :)
Test9 has been running (with nvidia patched) since this morning
without any trouble, but the load has been reasonably light.
One
It's an M-Audio Quattro USB interface. It works fine with the latest
2.4 kernel, especially the tmb version.
Does it require some patch to work with 2.4 or is the driver in alsa ?
Damn, the 2.6 song will have to wait until this is fixed... ;-)
I'm impatient to listen it :)
--
Olivier Blin
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:31, Olivier Blin wrote:
It's an M-Audio Quattro USB interface. It works fine with the latest
2.4 kernel, especially the tmb version.
Does it require some patch to work with 2.4 or is the driver in alsa ?
No, it should not.
When compiled from source, it works fine.
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:31, Olivier Blin wrote:
Does it require some patch to work with 2.4 or is the driver in alsa ?
Sorry, let me rephrase that...
It uses the standard snd-usb-audio module.
Damn, the 2.6 song will have to wait until this is fixed... ;-)
I'm impatient to listen it :)
I
Wow. I eat my words.
Test9.4mdk kicks ass. All modules load (alsa, firewire, USB, video,
even joystick!!!) This is very cool.
thanks to svetljo, he told me how to fix it
Responsiveness is insane. Like even my mouse cursor moves faster. Is
that normal?
yes :)
it was quit normal in
This thing is insane.
With the 2.6 kernel, I can record many many tracks of two-channel 44.1k
audio, in full duplex, without a click or a pop or a glitch of latency
or noise. No mm kernel. No capabilities. No frigging with IRQ or alsa
or tmp settings. Just install the kernel and record.
I
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:16:23 -0500
Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OH! I take it all back...
really ? :)
I just spent a whopping 20 minutes writing a song about how cool 2.6
is, and then I went to record it, and my bloody audio interface won't
work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] austin]# tail
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 00:02, Olivier Blin wrote:
Your problem has been reported here :
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09733.html
Enh... probably best to let them fix it. There are several Quattro
users on that list, including Takashi, who wrote the alsa usb driver in
the
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 06:02:27 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:16:23 -0500
Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OH! I take it all back...
really ? :)
I just spent a whopping 20 minutes writing a song about how cool 2.6
is, and
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i would rather wait for a later bk snapshot
if the question is what to release I'd rather used test9 given two
mentioned problems.
Should I consider applying 2.6.0-test9-mm1 patchset ?
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1070
since andrew will be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Blin wrote:
So the problem may/must be in mkinitrd.
I'm working on it.
My mistake, it's a bug in kernel packaging.
No depmod is done in %install, so mkinitrd find the first time an empty
modules.desc file and can't guess ext3 depends on
Le Dimanche 2 Novembre 2003 09:29, Tim Sawchuck a écrit :
On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 11:44:20 +
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 02:23, Olivier Blin wrote:
I really need to browse all kernel config options, the initial
config was
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:24:52PM +0100, Gilles Mocellin wrote:
I had the same exact thing last night on my first attempt to try the 2.6
test9-2mdk kernel.
Does this kernel support LVM (version 1, compatibile with 2.4) ?
nope.
If you want to use lvm with 2.6 you need to test the packages at
It seems you're a bit ahead of the rest of us ... by about a day ...
oops, sorry, it should be fixed now :)
I should sleep a bit now ...
--
Olivier Blin
I forgot to mention that I tried the
kernel-enterprise-2.4.22.23mdk
kernel. All enterprise kernels have worked up to and
including 21mdk. Is there possibly another new
package required by 23mdk that I have overlooked?
I am running the 9.2 bittorrent version.
I am using grub as bootloader.
I have
zephod ha scritto:
On Saturday 01 November 2003 12:54, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
I got the same error in 9.1 (I was using reiserfs there too). Only kernel
working was initial 2.4.21-0.13mdk. Every other kernel, e.g. the
2.4.21-0.25mdk was
causing an error like that...
just for information:
wtih -18mdk no pb.
here are my partitions and fs :
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8 on / type ext3 (rw)
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part9 on /home type ext3 (rw)
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part10 on /usr type ext3
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 02:23, Olivier Blin wrote:
I really need to browse all kernel config options, the initial
config was done by Nanar months ago :)
Everybody is free to update it, I made a basic config to make the
package, but I am not good with kernel stuff, and my config are
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 11:23, arakeis wrote:
wtih -18mdk no pb.
here are my partitions and fs :
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8 on / type ext3 (rw)
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part9 on /home type ext3 (rw)
, 2 2003, 13:49,Adam Williamson:
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 11:23, arakeis wrote:
wtih -18mdk no pb.
here are my partitions and fs :
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8 on / type ext3 (rw)
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
Le Dimanche 2 Novembre 2003 12:49, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 11:23, arakeis wrote:
wtih -18mdk no pb.
here are my partitions and fs :
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8 on / type ext3 (rw)
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
Same here :( I get kernel panic when booting with -23.
--
Live long and prosper!
Quel Qun wrote:
reiserfs seems to be borked.
I also get kernel panic with harddrive which has 3 partitions on it:
swap, ext3 and ntfs. So it is not just reiserfs. Worked just fine with
-19mdk kernel.
--
Live long and prosper!
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
Same here :( I get kernel panic when booting with -23.
Strange stuff:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stew]$ mount | head -1
/dev/hda5 on / type ext3 (rw)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stew]$ uname -r
2.4.22-23mdk
Seems to be OK here.
--
Stew Benedict
--
MandrakeSoft
On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 11:44:20 +
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 02:23, Olivier Blin wrote:
I really need to browse all kernel config options, the initial
config was done by Nanar months ago :)
Everybody is free to update
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 07:45, Stew Benedict wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
Same here :( I get kernel panic when booting with -23.
Strange stuff:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stew]$ mount | head -1
/dev/hda5 on / type ext3 (rw)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stew]$ uname -r
2.4.22-23mdk
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 08:45, Stew Benedict wrote:
$ mount | head -1
/dev/hda5 on / type ext3 (rw)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stew]$ uname -r
2.4.22-23mdk
Seems to be OK here.
same here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# mount
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5 on / type ext3 (rw)
none on /proc type proc
Could it be a clue that I have a /boot partition?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] also had:
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8 on / type ext3 (rw)
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
-- Bjarne
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 16:45, Stew Benedict wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc
BTW, test9-2mdk seems to be broken here - it has trouble loading the
ext3.o module early in the boot process and since all my partitions
are ext3 it can't mount anything and stops booting. Anyone else seeing
this, or did I break something?
Right, the ext3 module can't be loaded from the
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 04:08:30 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, test9-2mdk seems to be broken here - it has trouble loading the
ext3.o module early in the boot process and since all my partitions
are ext3 it can't mount anything and stops booting. Anyone else
seeing this, or
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 06:17:04 +0100
Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
indeed, test9-2 gives me almost the same kind of pb. (no boot an
ext3.ko pb)
Hmm, how come? My patch shouldn't be in 2.6-test9-2mdk so, there
shouldn't be any pb with it.
That's pure coincidence :)
I've compiled
Hi,
I also get kernel panic with harddrive which has 3 partitions on it:
swap, ext3 and ntfs. So it is not just reiserfs. Worked just fine with
-19mdk kernel.
Please try .test3 kernel on a UP system. I think you really should get
a message about partition table consistency checks failure and
But even with jdb in initrd, ext3 can't be loaded at boot.
Errm, there's a mistake in my /linuxrc, I'll retry right now :)
Found it.
If I add the following lines at the beginning of my /linuxrc in
initrd image, it boots fine with ext3 as a module :
echo Loading jbd.ko module
insmod
So the problem may/must be in mkinitrd.
I'm working on it.
My mistake, it's a bug in kernel packaging.
No depmod is done in %install, so mkinitrd find the first time an empty
modules.desc file and can't guess ext3 depends on jbd ...
A test9.4mdk will come later this evening, or are we already
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 22:25, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
In case -22mdk worked. Could you boot into -22mdk and fdisk -l /dev/hda
or whatever holds your reiserfs partitions? And, a dd if=/dev/hda
of=my_disk count=2 could help too.
A little more
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 04:03:03AM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
By the way, should we switch to ROM FS or Minix FS for initrd in order
to gain some space ?
first we've to hack mkinitrd,
and i'm not sure how much will we gain,
besides the initrd needs to be writable for lvm setup, so if we use
Hi,
Let me know if you need anything else.
Provided you use normal UP kernels, could you try the following kernels:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
And with .test1 please check for any partition table check failure
message. This shouldn't fix anything but trying to isolate
It is very easy to reproduce, but it has nothing to do
with reiserfs. I have the following scsi partitions:
/dev/sda5 / ext3 defaults 1 1
/dev/sda1 /boot ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/sda9 /usr ext3 defaults 1 2
/dev/sda7 /var xfs defaults 1 2
/dev/sda11 /home xfs defaults 1 2
I got the following lines
Quel Qun ha scritto:
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 22:25, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
In case -22mdk worked. Could you boot into -22mdk and fdisk -l /dev/hda
or whatever holds your reiserfs partitions? And, a dd if=/dev/hda
of=my_disk count=2 could help too.
A little
On Saturday 01 November 2003 12:54, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
I got the same error in 9.1 (I was using reiserfs there too). Only kernel
working was initial 2.4.21-0.13mdk. Every other kernel, e.g. the
2.4.21-0.25mdk was
causing an error like that...
just for information: 2.4.21-0.18mdk works ok
On Saturday 01 November 2003 03:34, Olivier Blin wrote:
I really need to browse all kernel config options, the initial config
was done by Nanar months ago :)
my config for test9 attached. It was initially based on standard mdk config.
With this I can boot mdk 2.4 and vanilla 2.4 and vanilla
On Saturday 01 November 2003 06:03, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
all FS's built in ? why that ?
Oops, there is no reason to do that, I've now compiled ext3, jbd,
ReiserFS, jfs and xfs as modules in -2mdk.
ext2 is still built-in because our initrd image is ext2.
By the way, should we
On Friday 31 October 2003 13:46, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
actually on second look it's a bit later,
the last line is :
Freeing unused kernel memory:272k freed
[...]
Do you mean that using the same setup test9 stops logging to console and
previous kernels not?
i haven't
On Saturday 01 November 2003 06:03, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
all FS's built in ? why that ?
Oops, there is no reason to do that, I've now compiled ext3, jbd,
ReiserFS, jfs and xfs as modules in -2mdk.
ext2 is still built-in because our initrd image is ext2.
By the way, should
On Friday 31 October 2003 13:46, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
actually on second look it's a bit later,
the last line is :
Freeing unused kernel memory:272k freed
[...]
Do you mean that using the same setup test9 stops logging to console
and
previous kernels not?
On Saturday 01 November 2003 21:01, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
OK
so what options do we have to reduce the kernel/ initrd size ?
optimize compilation?
My initrd consists only of reiserfs. Compare:
{pts/2}% l -s /boot/initrd-2.6.0-test9.img
992 /boot/initrd-2.6.0-test9.img
{pts/2}% l
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 01:07, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
Let me know if you need anything else.
Provided you use normal UP kernels, could you try the following kernels:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
And with .test1 please check for any partition table check
Le Samedi 01 Novembre 2003 01:34, Olivier Blin a écrit :
cause the problems with /etc/init.d/alsa
if set to =m everything is ok
thanks, fixed in -2mdk
I really need to browse all kernel config options, the initial config
was done by Nanar months ago :)
Everybody is free to update it, I
I really need to browse all kernel config options, the initial
config was done by Nanar months ago :)
Everybody is free to update it, I made a basic config to make the
package, but I am not good with kernel stuff, and my config are
surelly not perfect.
I made the package because nobody
well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh
Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as well?
well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh
Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as
well?
well,
it was reported by 3-4 people on lkml :-)
besides Linus is currently accepting only _real_bug_fixes_
and i have the impression that somehow -bk's are more stable
well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh
Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as
well?
well,
it was reported by 3-4 people on lkml :-)
Ah, if you mean that, it was not rsh. The OOB data delivery was broken
and this is used by rsh to transmit
well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh
Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as
well?
well,
it was reported by 3-4 people on lkml :-)
Ah, if you mean that, it was not rsh. The OOB data delivery was broken
and this is used by
PS.
is serial console working for everyone ?
i just tried it and when fbcon took over vgacon,
it stopped logging to ttyS0
is this normal behaviour ?
apparently not. I guess James Simmons may be interested :) BTW have you
tried
actually on second look it's a bit
PS.
is serial console working for everyone ?
i just tried it and when fbcon took over vgacon,
it stopped logging to ttyS0
is this normal behaviour ?
apparently not. I guess James Simmons may be interested :) BTW have
you
tried
actually on second look
well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh
and here is the fix by Linus
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=106722085714275w=2
oups, I'll fix that in another release
CONFIG_SOUND=yes
CONFIG_SND=yes
cause the problems with /etc/init.d/alsa
if set to =m everything is ok
i would rather wait for a later bk snapshot
if the question is what to release I'd rather used test9 given two
mentioned problems.
Should I consider applying 2.6.0-test9-mm1 patchset ?
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1070
The -love patchset from Gentoo guys has a lot of new features :)
all FS's built in ? why that ?
Oops, there is no reason to do that, I've now compiled ext3, jbd,
ReiserFS, jfs and xfs as modules in -2mdk.
ext2 is still built-in because our initrd image is ext2.
By the way, should we switch to ROM FS or Minix FS for initrd in order
to gain some space
i would rather wait for a later bk snapshot
if the question is what to release I'd rather used test9 given two
mentioned problems.
Should I consider applying 2.6.0-test9-mm1 patchset ?
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1070
The -love patchset from Gentoo guys has a lot of new
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
Did it work with -22mdk?
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
In case -22mdk worked. Could you boot into -22mdk and fdisk -l /dev/hda
or whatever holds your reiserfs partitions? And, a dd if=/dev/hda
of=my_disk count=2 could help too.
A little more information about the kernel panic would be helpful too
as we can't
reiserfs seems to be borked.
--
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You may just as well jump to test9. I built against test8 only because
test9 did not propagated to locale kernel.org mirror last weekend.
patch applies to it even without any offset.
Nice :)
I have packaged -test9 with supermount -test8 patch, you can find it
here :
You may just as well jump to test9. I built against test8 only because
test9 did not propagated to locale kernel.org mirror last weekend.
patch applies to it even without any offset.
Nice :)
I have packaged -test9 with supermount -test8 patch, you can find it
here :
I've built rpms of kernel-2.6-test8 (thanks to Andrey who released
supermount for -test8).
You may just as well jump to test9. I built against test8 only because test9 did not
propagated to locale kernel.org mirror last weekend. patch applies to it even without
any offset. Also I had very nasty
I've built rpms of kernel-2.6-test8 (thanks to Andrey who released
supermount for -test8).
You may just as well jump to test9. I built against test8 only because
test9 did not
propagated to locale kernel.org mirror last weekend. patch applies to it
even without
any offset. Also I had
any offset. Also I had very nasty problem with test8 - no traffic ever
flowed over dialup
PPP connection. test9 fixed it whatever it was.
i think it was fixed in test8-bk1 or bk2
(i had the same problem on a lan conection, but only with http, ssh ftp
worked)
good, I was curious it
Hi,
I've built rpms of kernel-2.6-test8 (thanks to Andrey who released
supermount for -test8).
They're available here :
http://www.enseirb.fr/~blino/kernel-2.6/
Can someone please confirm it boots and works before I upload the rpms
to contrib ?
Thanks
--
Olivier Blin
Hi,
I've built rpms of kernel-2.6-test8 (thanks to Andrey who released
supermount for -test8).
They're available here :
http://www.enseirb.fr/~blino/kernel-2.6/
Can someone please confirm it boots and works before I upload the rpms
to contrib ?
you might want to take a look at my
Hi,
My Samba box stalls after some usage, mapped drives disappear and users
can't write or read from drives. The stalls happen randomly. I'm running
2.4.19-16mdksmp and Samba 2.2.7a-9.2mdk. May I ask is this a kernel bug or
Samba bug? Does anyone know a fix for it? I checked the memory from BIOS,
Hi,
My Samba box stalls after some usage, mapped drives disappear and users
can't write or read from drives. The stalls happen randomly. I'm running
2.4.19-16mdksmp and Samba 2.2.7a-9.2mdk. May I ask is this a kernel bug
or Samba bug? Does anyone know a fix for it? I checked the memory from
101 - 200 of 2234 matches
Mail list logo
