Le Samedi 13 Septembre 2003 04:05, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> Ainsi parlait Pierre Jarillon :
> If you're interested in xml, see what was done in JPackage project to
> produce redhat and mandrake spec from the same base XML file.
>
> http://www.zarb.org/horde/chora/cvs.php/xml-spec?rt=jpackage&H
Ainsi parlait Pierre Jarillon :
> Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 17:07, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > > It would be nice to make a package for Mandrake and
> > > Debian with the same tool.
> >
> > what would be the benefit ?
>
> To reduce the amount of time needed and spent to make packages.
You're
Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 17:07, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > It would be nice to make a package for Mandrake and
> > Debian with the same tool.
> what would be the benefit ?
To reduce the amount of time needed and spent to make packages.
> being able to install the same package on the 2 dis
On Friday 12 September 2003 22:09, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > or you can use synaptics.
> > it reminds me that it is not packaged for contribs :/
>
> I packaged it months ago, after I fixed apt to work with cooker
> mirrors directly. But it looks li
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Michael Scherer wrote:
> On Friday 12 September 2003 13:02, vbnh fdgfd wrote:
> > Apt4rpm (http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/) have the same fonctionality
> > as URPMI.
Note that apt4rpm and apt-rpm are different tools, apt-rpm is a fork of
debian apt, apt4rpm is some kind of ge
Marcel Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I quote a reply from Pixel here, from February 24 2002 (Yes, it was discussed
> before :-) )
>
>
> there was a moment where we had 2 solutions, both time costly:
> - dump urpmi, and switch to apt-get
> - enhance urpmi
>
> cons for switching to apt-get:
>
On Friday 12 September 2003 16:19, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
> Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 15:11, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit :
> > Le ven 12/09/2003 à 14:49, Pierre Jarillon a écrit :
> > > Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 13:27, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit :
> > > > urpmi is THE killer feature of Mandr
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:28:50 +
"_ cosmicflo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I could agree if apt and urpmi were only for the same purpose, but did
> >urpmi-parallel (possibility to install on many differents machines of a
> >cluster -may be a subnetwork-) exists for apt for example ?
>
> If
I could agree if apt and urpmi were only for the same purpose, but did
urpmi-parallel (possibility to install on many differents machines of a
cluster -may be a subnetwork-) exists for apt for example ?
If this feature is so great, why don't include it in apt4rpm ?
Both are opensource, no ?
If you
Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 15:11, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit :
> Le ven 12/09/2003 à 14:49, Pierre Jarillon a écrit :
> > Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 13:27, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit :
> > > urpmi is THE killer feature of Mandrake above all others distributions.
> > > Apt was a must, but for
Le ven 12/09/2003 à 14:49, Pierre Jarillon a écrit :
> Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 13:27, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit :
>
> > urpmi is THE killer feature of Mandrake above all others distributions.
> > Apt was a must, but for now, it seems urpmi is better (from my point of
> > view ...)
>
> Free
Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 13:27, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit :
> urpmi is THE killer feature of Mandrake above all others distributions.
> Apt was a must, but for now, it seems urpmi is better (from my point of
> view ...)
Free software always need a friendly competition with at least two grea
On Friday 12 September 2003 13:02, vbnh fdgfd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apt4rpm (http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/) have the same fonctionality
> as URPMI.
> URPMI is a greet tool but why reinvent the wheel ?
yes.
so, can you tell to people who ported apt that urpmi was here before
apt-rpm, and then, they s
Le ven 12/09/2003 à 13:02, vbnh fdgfd a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Apt4rpm (http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/) have the same fonctionality as
> URPMI.
> URPMI is a greet tool but why reinvent the wheel ?
>
> Mdk team is not big at this time, why "loose" time with a redundant software
> devel ?
>
> And Rp
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:02, vbnh fdgfd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apt4rpm (http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/) have the same fonctionality as
> URPMI.
> URPMI is a greet tool but why reinvent the wheel ?
>
> Mdk team is not big at this time, why "loose" time with a redundant software
> devel ?
>
> And Rpm
Hi,
Apt4rpm (http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/) have the same fonctionality as
URPMI.
URPMI is a greet tool but why reinvent the wheel ?
Mdk team is not big at this time, why "loose" time with a redundant software
devel ?
And Rpmdrake could be changed to use apt-get, no ?
thanks
__
16 matches
Mail list logo
