On Friday 06 July 2001 07:10, you wrote:
> Who speaks about "stable use" of cooker?
>
I think I have to make my intensions somewhat more clear:
I started this thread because I suspected that the Cooker-team had made a
decision - only to introduce the last kernel once a week.
Here is my argume
On Friday 06 July 2001 00:23, you wrote:
> It is the kind of explanation that you wanted?
Thanks, I read kernel-traffic every weak and must have missed the full
implications of Alan's remark.
regards
guran
> "guran" == guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
guran> On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:21, you wrote:
>> Frankly, I by far prefer this kind of questions rather than plain old
>> insults that you wrote beginning this thread.
>>
>> "Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the p
On Friday 06 July 2001 07:10, you wrote:
> Who speaks about "stable use" of cooker?
>
I think I have to make my intensions somewhat more clear:
I started this thread because I suspected that the Cooker-team had made a
decision - only to introduce the last kernel once a week.
Here is my argume
>
> Anyways, cooker is cooker, and it could perfectly include the -ac
> kernel a few
> hours after release, but then do not send any mail claiming 'my disk was
> toasted by latest mdk kernel'
Eh? "Do not send bug reports"? What are you talking about? Cooker is there
so that people can test new ve
On 20010705 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>>
>> But the policy of waiting to introduce new kernels into Cooker must mean
>> that someone have concluded that all future problems with Cooker is not
>> related to problems already existent in the kernel.
>>
>> What is the good thing, please related t
Guillaume,
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Sorry, I owe nothing to you, please go emit a judgment on someone else.
You are absolutely right. Sorry!
Randy Kramer
guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:21, you wrote:
>
> > Frankly, I by far prefer this kind of questions rather than plain old
> > insults that you wrote beginning this thread.
> >
> > "Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?"
> >
>
>
On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:21, you wrote:
> Frankly, I by far prefer this kind of questions rather than plain old
> insults that you wrote beginning this thread.
>
> "Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?"
>
It was not my intention, to kick on a person, I wante
Randy Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guillaume,
>
> I know you have a sense of humor, based on this quote:
>
> "If you've ever had a chance to visit Mercury or asteroid Geographos,
> here you'll find them looking exactly the same way, following exactly
> the same path as when you've left
Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> /me also notes the strange reluctance of mdk employees (synonymous with
> 'people that are paid') to publicly upload the significant changes in
> drakx that will (hopefully) be polished up nice and shiny for a super
> duper 8.1 stability and 9.0 a
just had to put my nonsensical 2 cents in.
/me waits for chmouel to chime in since he's been with this project as
kernel maintainer for much longer than even Juan.
/me also notes some significant changes in the 246pre's.
/me wonders why we seem to anticipate freeze all of the sudden. /me
rememb
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:22:36PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> "Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> > Nobody says cooker is bad. But it is very strange to see that one one hand
> > you (meaning "who ever adds stuff to cooker") blindly remove library that
> >
Guillaume,
I know you have a sense of humor, based on this quote:
"If you've ever had a chance to visit Mercury or asteroid Geographos,
here you'll find them looking exactly the same way, following exactly
the same path as when you've left them."
I know it's tough to keep. Is there a web page
Pixel wrote:
> in fact, i'd say it depends mainly on maintainer... and on the size of the
> package ;pp
OK - I will have to buy into reality.
regards
guran
"Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single
> > > reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro.
> > >
> >
> > If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me!
> >
>
> Nobody says cooker is bad. But it
Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
>Either it is cooker or not.
That is a policy, even I can understand - more of that!
regards
guran
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> In case you didn't notice, I'm not a kernel packager.
Well I'll gladly admit that I am ignorant.
But the policy of waiting to introduce new kernels into Cooker must mean
that someone have concluded that all future problems with Cooker is not
related to problems alr
>
> > If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single
> > reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro.
> >
>
> If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me!
>
Nobody says cooker is bad. But it is very strange to see that one one hand
you (meaning "who ever ad
guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single
> > reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro.
> >
>
> If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me!
In case you didn't notice, I'm not
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single
> reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro.
>
If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me!
regards
guran
guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 05 July 2001 10:37, you wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > According to alan Cox there are fs pb's in kernels lower than ac24 and
> > Cooker is at ac18. Has anyone tested for urpmi problems on a new kernel?
>
> Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan an
guran wrote:
>
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >
> > So sprach guran am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:53:14AM +0200:
> > > Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
> >
> > What do you mean?
>
> Someone at Mandrake has earlier argued that he did not want to furnish
> the new k
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> So sprach guran am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:53:14AM +0200:
> > Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
>
> What do you mean?
Someone at Mandrake has earlier argued that he did not want to furnish
the new kernel because some experimental
So sprach guran am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:53:14AM +0200:
> Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
What do you mean?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com |
On Thursday 05 July 2001 10:37, you wrote:
> Hi
>
> According to alan Cox there are fs pb's in kernels lower than ac24 and
> Cooker is at ac18. Has anyone tested for urpmi problems on a new kernel?
Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?
regards
guran
26 matches
Mail list logo
