Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment-1.7 packaging

2003-01-14 Thread Warly
roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Willing to volunteer to start packing this desktop into SRPM. The only problem is trying to get a cvs snapshot to build without errors. ~2 mos ago, evas was being a real pain in the arse when trying to get apps that depend on it to build properly. Traced

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment in current cooker

2002-04-02 Thread Curtis H
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 11:21, Charles A Edwards wrote: Running current cooker and enlightenment when changing the theme or choosing restart enlightenment you get the spinning hand clock face as is normal but it thinks it is the 'energizer bunny' and keeps going and going and going.

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment in current cooker

2002-04-02 Thread Charles A Edwards
On 02 Apr 2002 19:59:39 -0800 Curtis H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've run into the same problem. Here's what I noticed: Dropping to a console and doing a ps shows that there are two instances of enlightenment running. Killing the one that lists the old theme unfreezes E. Didn't

Re: [Cooker] enlightenment-theme-error

2002-01-07 Thread Stefan Hußfeldt
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:37:20PM -0900, William Bouterse wrote: cooker 20011224 enlightenment-0.16.5-6mdk bluesSteel theme gives error on startup; CONFIG:missing required data in 100 PROGRESS_TEXT_NUMBER CONFIG:missing required data in 5vixar/12 CONFIG:missing required data in

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-15 Thread Vadim Plessky
On Wednesday 14 March 2001 1:18, Vox wrote: |On Tuesday 13 March 2001 2:56, you wrote: | Will specfile from E 0.16 work for it? (I'd like to build Binary RPM) | | I don't think the specfile for 16 will work on 1717 is made of a | whole lot of stuff that 16 doesn't

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Frederic Crozat
Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Vadim Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit : Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and new features, comparing to E 0.16. I have checked Cooker - it still holds

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Vadim Plessky
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 2:56, you wrote: | Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Vadim | | Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit : |Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen |on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and |new

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Frederic Crozat wrote: Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Vadim Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit : Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and new features, comparing

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Joakim Bodin
Vadim Plessky wrote: Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and new features, comparing to E 0.16. I have checked Cooker - it still holds E 0.16. Do you plan to update it? (imlib2 is

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Stefan Hußfeldt
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:14:35PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Would be nice to have Eterm-0.9 to. *That* would be fine ;) -- Und Tschss. Stefan ### Kilroy was here ### 6037 12:40pm up 4 days

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Vadim Plessky
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 11:17, you wrote: | It also would be nice to hear from Mandrake what is Etox, on which | Mandrake | people working? :-) | [...] | with the new version. And "Mandrake" in this case would be Geoff | "Mandrake" Harrison, | which is used the name mandrake

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread Vox
During the bombing raid on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:45:50 +, Vadim Plessky was heard mumbling in fear:: On Tuesday 13 March 2001 2:56, you wrote: | Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Vadim | | Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit : |Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago.

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17

2001-03-13 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
edb and imlib2 are both tagged as 1.0.x, you can go to rasterman.com and have a look. btw Geoffrey was to hasty to put it in contrib I've already done that, just not ready to upload it :D Abel Cheung On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Vadim Plessky wrote: Ok, may be I will try tar.gz from them.

Re: [Cooker] enlightenment

2001-02-08 Thread andre
The /etc/X11/wmsession.d/04enlightenment file is wrong. -EXEC=/usr/bin/enlightenment +EXEC=/usr/X11R6/bin/enlightenment seb Also enlightenment.install is broken. It produces a .xession pointing to /usr/bin/enlightenment and not /usr/X11R6/bin/enlightenment

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment

2000-10-29 Thread Geoffrey Lee
Yo, On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:10:00PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: sebastid@s186b:~$ /usr/sbin/chksession -x=Enlightenment #!/bin/sh [ -f $HOME ] || { /usr/bin/enlightenment.install } exec /usr/bin/enlightenment Umm, probably should be -d $HOME ... -- Can anyone tell me

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment

2000-10-29 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Geoffrey Lee wrote: Yo, On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:10:00PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: sebastid@s186b:~$ /usr/sbin/chksession -x=Enlightenment #!/bin/sh [ -f $HOME ] || { /usr/bin/enlightenment.install } exec /usr/bin/enlightenment Umm,

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.16.4

2000-05-11 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Soulier, Frederic P" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Any plan to have v0.16.4 in Mdk 7.1? eh we're frozen for ages now!!! (I am still seing changelog for ver: 0.16.3 rel: mdk11) -- Guillaume Cottenceau

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment

1999-11-08 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Paul Duran wrote: I believe that 0.16.2 came out like under a day ago... Maybe a little patience is in order? :) Was it that soon? I thought it was longer than that... hmmm... sorry then... just a little eager I suppose... =) Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ:

Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment

1999-11-07 Thread Paul Duran
I believe that 0.16.2 came out like under a day ago... Maybe a little patience is in order? :) On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 11:47:19PM -0700, Vincent Danen wrote: When are we going to see the new E? It's up to 0.16.2 now, but cooker just has 0.16.1. Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ: