Hi,
Think it should be a good idea too... many apps still rely on Qt2 and it would be time
saving
to have built in support for this (ATI's Radeon control panel does). At least for the
next year,
depending on apps' migration rate, it would be a good choice for backward
compatibility.
Best rega
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:19:31 -0400
Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> various commercial apps (notably Opera) do use Qt3.
Use the static version and you do not need a separate qt2.
Charles
--
Whatever it is, I fear Greeks even when they bring gifts.
-- Pub
On Tue Sep 03 21:58 +0200, laurent Montel wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 September 2002 21:38, Levi Ramsey wrote:
> > Would it be possible to include qt2 in contribs for 9.0?
>
> No
> Now all kde app use qt3/kde3.0, so it's not necessary to maintain a qt2
> package.
However, various commercial apps (no
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>
> > >This shouldn't be difficult, using %{expand...} and %(...) .
> > >But even when kdelibs-devel is installed, one may still want to
> > >compile a bootstrapped qt2 again; perhaps it'd be better to le
Vadim Plessky écrivit :
> Sunday 10 December 2000 23:27, Geoffrey Lee ???:
> | > By the way, does it make sense to have documentation & header files
> | > specified as "i586"?
> | > IMHO, it should .noarch.
> |
> | Yes you are rgiht but IMHO you can't do that since if you do noarch th
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Vadim Plessky wrote:
> There is no big problem at a moment, but I hope we will have Alpha and
> PowerPC ports some time later.
> It will be really stupid to have QT2-doc-xxx.i586.rpm, QT2-doc-xxx.alpha.rpm
> and QT2-doc-xxx.powerpc.rpm, as they are exactly the same docs.
>
Sunday 10 December 2000 23:27, Geoffrey Lee ???:
| > By the way, does it make sense to have documentation & header files
| > specified as "i586"?
| > IMHO, it should .noarch.
|
| Yes you are rgiht but IMHO you can't do that since if you do noarch the
| whole package will be noarch, whi
Yo.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:23:02PM +, Vadim Plessky wrote:
>
> I uploaded QT-2.2-2 compiled for i686 architecture to my site:
> http://htmltests.newmail.ru/qt2-2.2.2-1mdk.i686.rpm
>
> Uploading speed was very low, so I was not able to upload qt2-doc and -devel
> But I guess they should
> I have it compiled back in, but now I just need to get it to upload. It was
> real easy to add back to the rpm, the troll's makefile just didn't include
> it.
Thanks. Now I'll be able to compile QtEZ again this weekend.
--
Thomas M. Beaudry - k8la/ys1ztm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's dead Jim. G
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000, Thomas M. Beaudry wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2000, Christopher Molnar wrote:
>
> > Anyway's, don't know why it didn't compile be default. I am recompling a
> > fix right now and we will see if it works. Give me a few hours to get
> > some testing with it done and I will upload to
On Thu, 02 Nov 2000, Christopher Molnar wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
Hello
> I am not ignoring you, it just takes me a while to get through close to
> 200+ emails (not to mention mailing list messages) in my inbox daily :-(
Only 200No such implication. Easy to miss one message in
Cooker's
Hello Thomas,
I am not ignoring you, it just takes me a while to get through close to 200+
emails (not to mention mailing list messages) in my inbox daily :-(
Anyway's, don't know why it didn't compile be default. I am recompling a fix
right now and we will see if it works. Give me a few hours
Trying this question again. This is an essential peice of QT used for
internationalization.
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000, Thomas M. Beaudry wrote:
> What happened to msg2qm? I was trying to compile the latest version of
> QtEZ and discovered this file is missing. I have qt2-devel-2.2.1-3mdk.
--
Tho
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Bryan Paxton wrote:
> qt2 >= 2.2 is needed by kdelibs-1.92-12mdk
> eh ? : )
it is, and it is on the mirrors. qt2-2.2-0.2mdk
It's now .2mdk
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, [iso-8859-1] Jürgen Zimmermann wrote:
> the sources for qt2-2.2-0.1mdk have shown at the mirrors, but the
> compiled
> binaries have not.
>
> from ftp.sunet.se mirror:
>
> ftp> cd SRPMS
> 250 CWD command successful.
> ftp> dir qt2*
> 200 PORT command succe
Christian Zoffoli wrote:
>
> Jürgen Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> > the sources for qt2-2.2-0.1mdk have shown at the mirrors, but the
> > compiled
> > binaries have not.
> >
>
> try:
>
> http://ftp.littlepenguin.org/RPMS/
ftp://ftp.littlepenguin.org/RPMS :)
--
Yours Sincerly,
Jürgen Zimmermann wrote:
>
> the sources for qt2-2.2-0.1mdk have shown at the mirrors, but the
> compiled
> binaries have not.
>
try:
http://ftp.littlepenguin.org/RPMS/
--
Yours Sincerly,
Christian Zoffoli ''~``
/qt2 :) it is
a symlink to the one in QTDIR.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] qt2 headers
>
>
> Which RPM are you talking
Which RPM are you talking about? -devel or regular?
- Original Message -
From: "Anton Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mandrake Cooker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:05 AM
Subject: [Cooker] qt2 headers
> Is it just me or is the qglobal.h file missing from our RPM?
On 20 Dec 1999, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Takacs Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I created $SUBJECT :)
> > Where can I upload it? :)
> > I will create kde2 snapshot packages too :)
>
> see with lenny for contrib rpm.
I found 19991128 snapshot in contrib, but KARCH 1.89 needs 19991215 :)
I
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> Chmouel,
>
> > > I'm wondering why there is a "BuildArchitectures" line in the qt2 spec
> > > file.
> > >
> > > BuildArchitectures: i586
> > >
> > > Is this package only meant for the i586 architecture, or can it also be
> > > compiled
> > > on o
Chmouel,
> > I'm wondering why there is a "BuildArchitectures" line in the qt2 spec
> > file.
> >
> > BuildArchitectures: i586
> >
> > Is this package only meant for the i586 architecture, or can it also be
> > compiled
> > on other architectures (alpha or i686)? If so, can we do without the
> >
Sergio Korlowsky wrote:
> Eddy Cooper wrote:
>
> > Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> >
> > > Michael Irving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > > I use this :
> > > > >
> > > > > MOC=/usr/bin/moc2 QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt2/ ./configure --*
> > > > >
> > > > I see that you don't run Mandrake yourself as th
Eddy Cooper wrote:
> Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> > Michael Irving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > > I use this :
> > > >
> > > > MOC=/usr/bin/moc2 QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt2/ ./configure --*
> > > >
> > > I see that you don't run Mandrake yourself as there is no /usr/lib/qt2 when I
> >
> > (root@ke
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Michael Irving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > I use this :
> > >
> > > MOC=/usr/bin/moc2 QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt2/ ./configure --*
> > >
> > I see that you don't run Mandrake yourself as there is no /usr/lib/qt2 when I
>
> (root@kenobi)[/RPMS]-# rpm -qpl --changelog qt2-d
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> Eddy Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Has anyone managed to make the QT2 in Cooker compile anything? I've had
> > absolutely no luck so far.
>
> what program do you use ?
>
> I use this :
>
> MOC=/usr/bin/moc2 QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt2/ ./configure --*
>
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> Has anyone managed to make the QT2 in Cooker compile anything? I've had
> absolutely no luck so far.
>
I have gotten some luck.. and that is only when I manually hack the makefiles
to set that moc is really moc2.
FSSTD suck bigtime. IMHO it would work sooo
27 matches
Mail list logo
