So sprach »Robert L Martin« am 2001-09-11 um 19:14:04 -0400 :
> would bombing the capitol of afaghanistan be considered a clean
> strike???
If it hits just official targets - maybe.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: ht
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 12 September 2001 3:49 pm, you wrote:
> > Robert L Martin wrote:
> > > And frankly, I don't think it would
> > > be a "clean strike" (as if there's something like this...) just against
> > > Bin Laden or the leaders of Afghanistan
> > >
On Wednesday 12 September 2001 12:09 pm, you wrote:
> I hope your country will never experience this
> Tom
Terrorism is, sadly, a matter of daily life in many not-so-fortunate
countries. Where I come from, Indonesia, there are two active rebellions
going on, political figures in one of the provin
I hope your country will never experience this
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Skwar
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[Cooker] US under attack!!
Sorry for OT, but the
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Christian Belisle wrote:
> Blue Lizard wrote:
> >
> *snip*
>
> I don't know... but I think this is a development mailing list. Life is
> bad sometimes, but we don't have to bring the war here.
>
> So please, could we consider it classified and continue to keep this
> mailing
Blue Lizard wrote:
>
*snip*
I don't know... but I think this is a development mailing list. Life is
bad sometimes, but we don't have to bring the war here.
So please, could we consider it classified and continue to keep this
mailing list for development only?
If you still wish to fight with ea
And frankly, I don't think it would
be a "clean strike" (as if there's something like this...) just against
Bin Laden or the leaders of Afghanistan
-
would bombing the capitol of afaghanistan be considered a clean
strike???
--
Robert LaurenceMartin
>at the same time, those that foster or support, even take some
> satisfaction in today's events, should start hiding.. as the cowardly
> punk asshole bastards they are.
k...whatever...
>
> I hear Kabul has some cruise missiles over it right now
Allow me to clarify. The US is *_NOT_* re
Below are clips of both your emails on this subject ~ as an American,
I'm offended at your callous remarks. I would not wish this on you, but
try to imagine that you have friends and family in these areas and then
respect the fact the we (Americans) have a president whom is going to do
his best t
Blue Lizard wrote:
> the beginning of much more to come.
> and be careful who you throw accusations at. some day you will find
> yourself unhappily surprised.
I'm afraid you're right. May this day not be remembered as the first day
of the 21th century... I want to live in a world of peace and
the beginning of much more to come.
and be careful who you throw accusations at. some day you will find
yourself unhappily surprised.
So sprach »Vincent Meyer« am 2001-09-11 um 12:05:12 -0500 :
> So far most of the organizations that we'd think would do this have
> denied they had anything to do with it. The US is NOT going to randomly
Uhm, in some respect I agree. But: Suppose Bin Laden would be guilty;
this would mean that
So far most of the organizations that we'd think would do this have
denied they had anything to do with it. The US is NOT going to randomly
commit itself to war when it doesn't know who it is fighting. Most of
the Arab world gets along OK with the US.. why would we want to fight
them?
Regards,
Alexander Skwar wrote:
> God save us before Bush's reaction :(
>
Alex,
Bush isn't going to lash out at random over this - it will be
investigated and a reasonably appropriate action will be taken. Bombing
a major US city - with bombs or with hijacked planes - is an act of war,
and not e
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: mardi 11
septembre 2001 16:39:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] US
under attack!!
Sorry for OT, but the US has been attacked!World T
15 matches
Mail list logo
